Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Widescreen Weekend 2008 (UK) (Page 4)

 
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
Author Topic: Widescreen Weekend 2008 (UK)
Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 03-09-2008 09:51 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I hereby claim the prize for the first WW '08 pics to appear on Film-Tech...

 -

Yours Truly and Paul Rayton...

 -

Brian Guckian.

The Sand Pebbles looked great, though I do wish Candice Bergen would consider washing her hair every now and again. It seemed to get greasier and greasier with every passing shot, so much so that by the end of the film I was less interested in Steve McQueen's heroic sacrifice than wanting to force her into the nearest shower at gunpoint!

 |  IP: Logged

Stephen Furley
Film God

Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 03-10-2008 09:57 AM      Profile for Stephen Furley   Email Stephen Furley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Just come off the motorway in North London; should be home in about a hour and a half. An intresting time in Bradford this year, saw 'Windjammer' for the first time, also my first experience of Kinopanorama, and 70mm (2001) on the curved screen. Couldn't get a ticket to 'Hamlet', but I have seen it before. As I said before, I was unimpressed with the digital 'The Great Escape'; somebody told me that 'Blade Runner' was much better, but I didn't see that, I was just too tired last night.

I brief clip of something, I don't know what it was, was shown in digital on the curved screen yesterday morning; Darren, if you happen to be reading this, what was it? It looked a lot better than 'The Great Escape' did. Was it intended for curved screens? Can the Christie be set up to compensate for the curvature?

 |  IP: Logged

Ben Wales
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 602
From: Southampton. England
Registered: Jul 99


 - posted 03-12-2008 05:11 AM      Profile for Ben Wales   Email Ben Wales   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
[QUOTE] It looked a lot better than 'The Great Escape' did. E]

I belive it was scanned from the best available 35mm release Prints and not Restored as it made out to be - just some of the concerns you find with D-Cinema, not everthing is a good as it is made out to be with it!.

The screening of "Blade Runner" looked ok on the Flat screen and it was a near sell out for that one.

My favourite Higlights for this year was "The Sand Pebbles" and "Brainstorm" in 70mm on the curve.

The most odd film was "Honeymoon" that started out as a Travelogue and ended in a most strange Ballet film with a poor ending that made no sense [Confused] .

Good to meet up with some fellow Film-Tech members at Bradford and while I was at Bradford I covered 600 miles from Home and visited 3 Home Cinemas, with 2 with 70mm Projection while I was on my travels.

 |  IP: Logged

Thomas Hauerslev
Master Film Handler

Posts: 451
From: Copenhagen, Denmark
Registered: Aug 2000


 - posted 03-12-2008 06:30 AM      Profile for Thomas Hauerslev   Author's Homepage   Email Thomas Hauerslev   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Audience on Stage picture(s)

And Duncan's speach for Bill

More images in the days to come - took close to 500 images!

 |  IP: Logged

Brian Guckian
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 594
From: Dublin, Ireland
Registered: Apr 2003


 - posted 03-14-2008 06:13 PM      Profile for Brian Guckian   Email Brian Guckian   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Been busy since I got back - a BIG thank you Thomas for a marvellous event - it just gets better and better and was most educational. Always something new to learn, and great to see everyone there.

Incredible print of Star!, with a fine talk by Andrew Oran from Fotokem on the work involved. Also great to hear from him of 65mm shooting by Scorsese and Bond 22.

2001 with Q&A by Jan Harlan was a highlight for me as I'm a big Kubrick fan. But lots more to enjoy and much fruitful conversations and discussions. THE place to be last weekend!

Keep up the great work [thumbsup]

(Was I really that inebriated!)

 |  IP: Logged

Stephen Furley
Film God

Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 03-16-2008 06:06 AM      Profile for Stephen Furley   Email Stephen Furley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Ben Wales
I belive it was scanned from the best available 35mm release Prints and not Restored as it made out to be
So what was the point in that? Presumably better, and more suitable, elements exist, so the whole expensive transfer process will have to be done again. Why not show the best available release prints now, and do the digital transfer properly in the first place?

There is a finite amount of money available to make digital transfers, a finite amount of equipment exists, and there are a finite number of people with the necessary skills to do the work. This exercise was simply a waste of all three.

Did you notice the 'hair in the gate' at one point?

 |  IP: Logged

Thomas Hauerslev
Master Film Handler

Posts: 451
From: Copenhagen, Denmark
Registered: Aug 2000


 - posted 03-18-2008 03:58 AM      Profile for Thomas Hauerslev   Author's Homepage   Email Thomas Hauerslev   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Pictures

Captions to follow in a few days

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.