Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Bottom up lacing (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Bottom up lacing
Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 02-17-2008 07:50 PM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I submitted this post back in 2005 on reverse lacing on STRONG equipment....but do the "triangle" load as Brad mentions, for his recommendation works better.

Just scroll down to the latter part of this one page and you'll see my post on this topic.

-Monte

 |  IP: Logged

Stu Jamieson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 524
From: Buccan, Qld, Australia
Registered: Jan 2008


 - posted 02-17-2008 10:11 PM      Profile for Stu Jamieson   Email Stu Jamieson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Chris Slycord
While that works, try pulling enough film that you don't have to hit the motor switch when you're done. Puts less wear on the motor having it turn on and off quickly plus having your print spin quickly then stop can make it shift a bit.
I prefer to motor it down, that way you can confirm that everything is running correctly before the show starts. My procedure is:
1. Lace projector.
2. Check loops, sprockets and framing.
3. Close turret and run down.
4. While running down, manually open dowser and check framing while it is running. Also, flick sound drum pinch roller (we use Kinotons) while it is running to make sure the film is seated properly around the drum.
5. After run down, check loops and sprockets again.
6. Make sure turret is closed and soundtrack is facing me.
7. Make sure the right print is laced.
8. Check all rollers to and from platter tree.
9. Check for film tension on take up platter.

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 02-17-2008 11:13 PM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've never like to motor ("bumping the motor") film down the machine due to the added wear and tear on the starting mechanisms inside the motor itself.

That's what the flywheel on the motor (or turndown knob if Christies, or motor knob) is for - is to hand turndown the machine to check for operation before hitting the "Run" button.

One can lace up in the framebox where you need to begin, then do a manual turndown to set your start position.

I even give the flywheel (or knob) a twist as I hit the "Run" button - to get the interna on the spin plus to reduce the start amps down a bit.

Also, if one is careful on lacing up both machine and transport device, there is actually no need to motor down to ensure everything is in proper sequence (esp. in checking if film will start in frame..and that's a very long thread in itself located in this forum..) before hitting the "Run" button. Kind of a useless pre-show check procedure.

-Monte

 |  IP: Logged

Stu Jamieson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 524
From: Buccan, Qld, Australia
Registered: Jan 2008


 - posted 02-18-2008 02:17 AM      Profile for Stu Jamieson   Email Stu Jamieson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I get what you're saying there, Monte, but I guess there's really no substitute to firing the machine up and giving it a demo prior to start to make sure everything is operating properly at full speed. On some of the older equipment particularly I've been able to identify loose spindles and gates and the like simply because the machine sounded different during rundown. It's always handy solve these problems before they become mid-show catastrophes. Even if it's just a squeaky roller there's time to identify it and rectify it before the show starts, before it's out-of-sight-out-of-mind. our leaders are 20-30secs long so there's time for the projector to get to cruise speed. I guess ultimately it's a site preference and my employer seems happy to wear the slightly increased cost of wear and tear (not that I'm in a position to change site policy - I'm neither tech nor management). Horses for courses, I guess. [Smile]

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 02-18-2008 06:37 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I always motor down, if possible. In fact, one reel-to-reel, I add leader to motor down. Keep your hands away from the count down...the added wear and tear on the extra start is more than outweighed on the dirt free beginning of the film and to ensure that all is perfect before you start the reel/movie.

There is a difference between a "bump" and a run down. A bump is normally a sequence of short bursts that basically have the motor always on its start winding... a run down gets everything up to full-speed for a period and it is a single use. Whereas I have not had a single motor failure on me in nearly 3 decades of this practice...I'll stick to my methods and I think you will find that Brad will claim something very similar too (motor down).

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 02-18-2008 08:07 AM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Our 'motor down' is about 45 seconds long. Too long to just sit there and do nothing so they 'may as well' check their thread.

It's almost as if I planned it that way... [Eek!] [Razz]

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-18-2008 09:38 AM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Stu Jamieson
7. Make sure the right print is laced.
This should be step 1, I would think.

 |  IP: Logged

Blaine Young
Master Film Handler

Posts: 477
From: Kirkland, WA, USA
Registered: Sep 2006


 - posted 02-18-2008 10:02 AM      Profile for Blaine Young   Email Blaine Young   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
For me, when I thread a Cinemeccanica or Century, I thread top down. When I first was exposed to the Strong Apogee, and the convoluted pad roller/idle sprocket at the lower loop, I simply couldn't get my hands to load the gate, wrap the intermittent, maintain the loop, wrap the idle sprocket and then close the pad.

So I came up with a different approach. I lace the idle sprocket, sound head and then set my framing on the exit drive sprocket. Take up the slack by pulling back at the gate and then pull 3 frames down at the gate and then set the intermittent, close the gate and then the pad. Then I set the top loop and back thread the DTS head and/or film cleaner.

And I don't want to hijack the thread, but what is the general consensus regarding advancing through the leader. Do you thread to the start point, or do you thread early in the leader and then motor advance to the start point?

[EDIT]
Sorry - didn't read through the entire thread where Motoring was discussed...

[ 02-18-2008, 01:24 PM: Message edited by: Blaine Young ]

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-18-2008 01:03 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think the majority of people here thread just far enough for the leader to be attached securely to the platter, and then motor to the start point. That's the way I do it, at least....it takes about 30 seconds to run the film to the start point.

Monte's method above is fine for verifying if the projector is threaded properly, but motoring down allows you to verify that the entire film path is running correctly.

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 02-18-2008 01:17 PM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
on my lacing, since I come from the days of changeovers and use countdown leads, I still lace between "9" and "8" in the framebox - to closely match up the distance between cuemarks on the film as if doing changeovers, plus with my automation dowser delay settings.

If I used regular clear frameline leader, I usually have the lead splice halfway up on the platter tower to be approximate if I was using countdown leads.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 02-18-2008 01:57 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
As Steve predicted, I've never had a motor fail, and no I do not advocate "bumping" the motor. However turning the motor and letting it get full up to speed (or at a POSitioning speed, ala Kinoton) is highly recommended.

Threading right at the starting point is just foolish. I don't care if I hurt anyone's feelings here, people who do that ARE adding unnecessary wear to the start of the reel/platter pack. The film should always be handled well ahead of where the starting frame is and then motored or POSitioned down. Likewise there is no excuse for not adding some extra tail leader to the ends of the reels of platter pack (this can even be strips of film from a junk trailer). I am so sick and tired of getting a used print in mint or near mint condition, yet the end of the credits or reels are beaten to hell and back because of stupid handling practices like this. [Mad]

 |  IP: Logged

Blaine Young
Master Film Handler

Posts: 477
From: Kirkland, WA, USA
Registered: Sep 2006


 - posted 02-18-2008 02:37 PM      Profile for Blaine Young   Email Blaine Young   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I always place 25-30 feet of junk film on the end of the last reel. In some cases, our platters are down a flight of stairs from the projector, and my objective is that when the print tails out, all of the feature proper is on the platter, with the junk film lying on the floor (or cascading down the stairs).

As for motor failures - these Strong Crapogee projectors are such garbage. We've been open just 2 years and have had to replace 3 motors, 2 dozen projector head fans, 4 motor couplers and 2 intermittents. And the Strong platters are not much better - 16 3-deck units and we've already had to replace 3 motors. I sure miss the Vic5's and Vic8 with AW3 platters I had at GCC...

 |  IP: Logged

Stu Jamieson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 524
From: Buccan, Qld, Australia
Registered: Jan 2008


 - posted 02-18-2008 02:55 PM      Profile for Stu Jamieson   Email Stu Jamieson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mike Blakesley
quote: Stu Jamieson
7. Make sure the right print is laced.
This should be step 1, I would think.
Haha, of course it is! [Wink] My procedure above is only from lacing onwards (just following on from the topic of the thread). My Step 7 is actually the double check at the end of my entire procedure to confirm that the correct print is laced before I walk away from it.

 |  IP: Logged

Thomas Pitt
Master Film Handler

Posts: 266
From: Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
Registered: May 2007


 - posted 02-18-2008 03:23 PM      Profile for Thomas Pitt   Email Thomas Pitt   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Blaine, that's a good idea with the scrap film. I've seen it done in an IMAX booth (using old scratched pieces of movie film for threading and tail-out), but not very often on normal 35mm setups. If anything, you should put scrap film on the beginning of the film as well, as that's the part that's most likely to touch the floor when threading.

I've never actually tried this, but it should work in theory. How about lacing up everything except the projector, platter to platter, and THEN lacing up the projector with the film that's nearest on the rollers? That would eliminate the possibility that the film would touch the floor during threading, and the projectionist could then thread top-down or bottom-up, whichever they prefer.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 02-18-2008 04:47 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Ummm, Thomas, you might want to check out Threading 101 which has been in the tips section here for many years.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.