|
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
|
Author
|
Topic: where best to put filters to "stop down" the light
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bernie Anderson Jr
Master Film Handler
Posts: 435
From: Woodbridge, New Jersey
Registered: Apr 2000
|
posted 04-13-2008 06:22 PM
After reading this thread, I decided to take out my three bladed shutter and try it again. I remember now why I removed it. For some reason, I can't get shutter ghosts out of it, even with the fine adjustment (Super Simplex). If I clear up the top, the bottom starts to ghost and so on. Its as if the blades are just a hair to small to cover the movement of the film. I still get flicker and its only on the right side of the screen. Its not as bad as the 2 blade, but even with the 2 blade, I get more flicker on the right side of the screen than the left. Before anyone says anything, the power supply was rebuilt with new diodes and caps and they work and its focused and aligned properly. So its definitely something to do with the shutter.
Now my question is with the filters, what kind of filters are they? The Schneider Filters will not work, but the gel filters sound like they're a stage lamp filter used for stage work. If so, does anyone have the color number? And if this something that should be before the aperture? Or can it go between the aperture and the lens?
Bernie
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 04-14-2008 11:02 PM
Scott, luckily, when I first got to this theatre, I was a young snot nosed kid and I overdid everything. I told them to get literally a closet full of carbons and 5 sets of reflectors. Only recently I had to get more carbons, and only changed reflectors twice because of some kind of caustic goop that dripped down from the exhaust pipe when rain water blew into the intake vent.
quote: Tim Reed They're not rods, they're carbons.
Well, perhaps, but both work for me and both are technically correct. "Carbons" : the name assigned the specific functioning of a part in the arc lighting system; it derives from the main functioning component -- carbon, similar to the way "intermittent" is assigned to a specific functioning gear system to advance the film. If you said, the "film advancing gear system," you would still be correct.
Similarly, you can also refer to carbons in their more generic term which describes the part itself, i.e., carbon compressed and surrounded by a copper sheath (in some) in the form of a ROD -- hence, carbon rods. Perfectly understandable....it communicates what is intended and it's technically correct.
(How's that....did I wiggle my way out of that one?)
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|