Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Light on Screens (DRIVE-In) (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Light on Screens (DRIVE-In)
Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 05-28-2008 12:19 PM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
I like the footstool to be able to get up high enough to do the tread work!
I just use the stool to hit the upper roller, then I can thread up the machine standing on the floor.

With threading where the machine is rather higher than me since I thread standing on the floor, I put black spots on the frameboss of the machine with a marker so I can match up framelines that way without having to use the framebox.

I have a spot down on the INT assembly underneath the trap to line up a frameline and a matching arrow on the dowser cover with it's corresonding spot on the assembly for assembly frame center.

Doing this, I can thread in frame every time.

No, the lady that owns this drive-in isn't too afraid to spend money, just that the expenditures to get more light out - to get this Century to handle a larger bulb with a watercel and a larger lamphouse/rectifier assembly, just isn't in her budget right now.

Place only operates a few months of the year and only on wknds. And last year wasn't a good year with a lot of the junk that came out. This year, as soon as the hot movies drop to discount levels (she runs discount films out there), then she'll get some serious business.

 |  IP: Logged

Ron Funderburg
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 814
From: Chickasha, Oklahoma, USA
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 05-28-2008 01:21 PM      Profile for Ron Funderburg   Author's Homepage   Email Ron Funderburg   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
We have little light coming from other areas in fact there are no lights to the non screen side at all and what is to the screen side is a long way off with a lot of trees between us and them. The drive in outside of city limits and well off the highway so we are covered there. The width of the screen is 75 feet. I can't remember the height but I think it is 32 feet. I also can't remember the throw and my note book is not with me but I think that is 300 feet.

Monte keep up the good work even with the reduced care of the owner man. There are far to few drive-ins around!

The scope picture looks best I think we have enough light for what we are doing but certainly no extra we still discussing moving up in bulb size we can go up to 5,000 with the power supply easily.

The Lamp house is a Kin-Tron Xenex one of the larger ones I can't remember the amp and volt capacity but we aren't at the top so we can go larger. Glass reflector so that helps. Not having my note book here keeps me from giving exact numbers sorry. I left it at the drive-in have to go back in a day or so and retrieve it!

This place is very much a work in progress! The previous owner was one of those owners that doesn't put back in that Mark is so fond of! A big windstorm with 75 mile an hour gust took out there marquee the other night so they are trying to get it looked at now.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-28-2008 03:37 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Jack Ondracek
I have 7kW Big Sky lamps here. So far, I haven't seen anything that beats them... at least not in this application.
Jack,
The Technilite will give you the same light as your 7kw Big Sky whilst only running a 4200 watt lamp. So thats about 30% more light equivelent than the Big Sky. There is also ALOT less heat on the aperature because of the glass mirror. Nothing I've seen out there will beat a Technilite conversion including Kinoton's stuff. I didn't believe the stuff about thei eitherr gear until I saw a conversion and had the chance to measure the light. We have six of them here in Utah.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 05-28-2008 03:54 PM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Ron Funderburg
There are far too few drive-ins around
THX for the comment! [thumbsup] Sadly, there were scads of DrIns in this area, but all were knocked down for businesses.

(in 1969, I started at this Drive-In and began my crazy association with this industry here.Interestingly enough, this Drive-In is still in operation.)

From the good dozen in this area at one time, now there are only two standing - the one I work at, and the one close to the Ida/Ore border, which the latter is in prime/mint condition and really draws the crowds in the three days it's opened. That small 250 car yard is always full during the summer.

I also do service work for both Drive-Ins. The other one has a water cooled XL/4star setup mounted in front of a CFS4500 console, 4200w bulb inside, with an AW3 for their film transport.

Luckilly, her scope pictures looks pretty good - thank goodness for full open apertures...lol

 |  IP: Logged

Ron Funderburg
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 814
From: Chickasha, Oklahoma, USA
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 05-28-2008 08:05 PM      Profile for Ron Funderburg   Author's Homepage   Email Ron Funderburg   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Keep them drive-ins going! I have two drive-ins right now that I'm consulting on and doing the service for with another one that I may pick up later on; however, the third one is a long way off (5 hours) and may be to far for me to do the service work on very easy since I'm rather tied to the indoor I run. Just have to see.

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 05-29-2008 05:16 AM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mark Gulbrandsen
With a technilite conversion and 5kw lamp its very possible to hit the 20 footlambert level on many a drive inn screen.
Tim? [Wink]

What size screens are they lighting to get these results Mark?

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-29-2008 07:40 AM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: John Wilson
What size screens are they lighting to get these results Mark?

Off the top of my head I don't remember but I will find out for you today. The projectionist there is one of our techs so thats an easy one. I do know that one screen there has an 800 foot throw and requires a 21" focal length flat lens . Also no lenses were replaced out there, all that was done was the lamphouse upgrades. Their outdoor images look better than most indoor images!!

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Robert Throop
Master Film Handler

Posts: 412
From: Vernon, NY USA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-29-2008 08:43 AM      Profile for Robert Throop   Email Robert Throop   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mark Gulbrandsen
800 foot throw and requires a 21" focal length flat lens .
Man, that would give about a 17 ft. high picture. No wonder they're getting 20 fl.
Bob

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 05-29-2008 10:12 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yeah, I want to see that 21" lens. Presumming no lens barrel and just magically suspended glass, a 4" OD lens would effectively be stopped down to f/5.5. For a standard 70.6 OD barrel, you are pretty close to f/8.

I presume this thing flares out oat the end to get "some" light out of it.

As to light...I've done a fair amount of experimenting with it, myself.

The lamp, reflector, shutter, and Lens ALL play into the light the system puts out.

The shutter is easiest to conceptualize. The more opening it has, the more light, as a percentage it will let through. Most mechanial shutters have an effective 50% efficientcy. Simplex is closer to 53% if you tweek it just right but is safer at 50%. Kinoton also is better than 50%. The current Kinoton FP30E Premiere, at 57% efficient will increase your light about 14% over a typical projector, all else being equal

As for the light itself, different lamps work better/worse with different reflectors. It isn't just about creating the lumens at the arc but how the reflector collects that light and focuses it to the lens. It is also about how the reflector mates with the lens to efficiently get as much light as possible though the lens.

I have tested 5K lamps that, in the same lamphouse, same lens put out 8% LESS light than the 4K lamp, both running at their respective powers!

I have also tested 4200-watt lamps that will put out 20% more light than their 4KW counter parts. Or the absolute kicker...a 4500 watt lamp that put out nearly 40% more light than the 4KW counterpart!! All without changing anything but the lamp.

I'm also finding that the evenness of the illumination, not just the center, varies based on reflector/lens characteristics.

I have no doubt that Technolite has specific lamps they have you use with their optics and they would also be wise to specify lenses too as they do play into it.

The bulk of my testing has been with Kinoton projectors/lamps with ISCO and Schneider lenses. These results may not apply to other combinations.

The 4200-watt lamp in question was ASL's XM4202. The 4500-watt lamp is still under test.

The 4KW lamp (reference used for all of the above) was Christie's CXL-40SC.

The 5KWs were Christie's CXL-50SC AND the ASL XM5000HS...both dogged. I suspect the arc was too big and or the anode was too large for efficient light transmission though a 1.85 aperture.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Ron Funderburg
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 814
From: Chickasha, Oklahoma, USA
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 05-29-2008 10:21 AM      Profile for Ron Funderburg   Author's Homepage   Email Ron Funderburg   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Steve,

Technolite does have a specific bulb that you have to use for it to work right. It isn't not any more expensive than any others and I don't remember the exact one that they tell you!

Again we haven't switched to Technolite for this drive in yet. Not sure they will even do it but I think they would be happy with the results.

I'm working on getting them to upgrade the lenses at this point.

Ron

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-29-2008 11:14 AM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Ron Funderburg
Technolite does have a specific bulb that you have to use for it to work right.
Yes, the 4.2 kw Osram is what they reccomend. The 21" focal length lens is a 4" Kollmorgen Gold Series that was gotten from Glenn Bergren himself. It is a lens of which just a few were hand made and Glenn had one left. I believe it's an f2.8 on the speed and no it doesn't flare out at the end. I have a picture of it somewhere .

quote: Ron Funderburg
I'm working on getting them to upgrade the lenses at this point.

Actually you'd see more impressive results by doing the lamp coversion first and it will cost you less. The 6 screen D.I. here didn't and isn't going to bother with new lenses. If you want some input from the projectionist at the Drive in here that has six of them just give us a call. Just wait till about 11:00 to call since he doesn't come in till then... he's up usually till 4am.

Mark

CLACO Equipment
801-355-1250

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 05-29-2008 11:42 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
A 21" EF with a nominal 4" OD? It is an f/5.25 at best...that is the physical facts.

The BX265 series (4" diameter) topped out at 7" from all of the literature I could find.

I'm most curious.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Ron Funderburg
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 814
From: Chickasha, Oklahoma, USA
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 05-29-2008 11:51 AM      Profile for Ron Funderburg   Author's Homepage   Email Ron Funderburg   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Mark they are using lenses manufactured in late 50's or early 60's it is time for new lenses.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-29-2008 12:27 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Ron,

I wish I could agree. The images are sharp as a tack there. About all they might gain is a bit better contrast ratio. Indeed, the lenses they have are more then satisfactory and as I said the image quality is better than many indoor theaters in this area. Earl just came in and I checked with him on the lens and throw just to be sure... I was wrong on the lens focal length... its a 22" NOT A 21" and the throw is not 800 feet, its 690 feet.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 05-29-2008 12:34 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I too have seen Super-Cinefore (B&L) as well as Kollmorgan 4" lenses look VERY impressive for their age.

Most, if not all of the development in lenses in the last 3 decades have been on focal lengths 100mm (4") and below. The 100-150mm Cinelux designs go back to the '70s and the 160-180mm go back to the '80s from Schneider. Anything in a Kiptar design is going back into the '60s...which were the only "modern" lenses that went above 180mm.

A big advantage to using the 4" diameter lenses is you can get more light through them. But at 22", you are still maxed out at an f/5.5. Which is tons better than a max of f/8 on a 2-25/32 lens barrel.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.