Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » White vs. green Media Cleaner Pads (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: White vs. green Media Cleaner Pads
Oliver Harper
Film Handler

Posts: 29
From: Cambridge, United kingdom
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 09-29-2008 05:34 AM      Profile for Oliver Harper   Email Oliver Harper   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I work for Cineworld and we use Strong. The lens we use are schnieder lens. The white cleaning media we did use in the past and it was softer and actually cheaper but we found it hardly removed much dirt. So we changed to the green media which is very helpful when you have a old film come in for a one day special and its incredibly dusty, we haven't noticed any problems with our prints, we only clean them once a week so we haven't noticed any changes in quality of our prints.

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 09-29-2008 06:20 AM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Oliver, are you using Film Guard?

 |  IP: Logged

Oliver Harper
Film Handler

Posts: 29
From: Cambridge, United kingdom
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 09-30-2008 05:13 AM      Profile for Oliver Harper   Email Oliver Harper   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
No we don't use film guard, we have discussed using it but we know if someone puts too much on the print it can ruin them so i've heard.

Our prints are usually brand new and we take good care of them but we do get second hand prints from time to time usually from Sony but they often have film guard applied to them by the lab.

[ 09-30-2008, 11:59 AM: Message edited by: Oliver Harper ]

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 09-30-2008 08:01 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
There are so many things wrong with that post, I don't know where to start. Somebody help! Love the "usually always".

 |  IP: Logged

Oliver Harper
Film Handler

Posts: 29
From: Cambridge, United kingdom
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 09-30-2008 12:01 PM      Profile for Oliver Harper   Email Oliver Harper   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Nice attitude there Joe.

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Slycord
Film God

Posts: 2986
From: 청주시, 경북도, South Korea
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 09-30-2008 12:13 PM      Profile for Chris Slycord   Email Chris Slycord   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Oliver Harper
we know if someone puts too much on the print it can ruin them so i've heard.
If you know it to be true, you wouldn't be adding the "so I've heard" bit.

In short: What you've heard is wrong. Sure, using too much is bad/stupid but it wouldn't ruin your print.

Regardless, if you follow the directions you won't be "using too much of it" and if you don't trust the people you work with to be able to read simple directions and follow them then those people shouldn't be in the booth.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 09-30-2008 12:16 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
The first problem is Strong. So you find the abrasive green media cleans better than the softer white media...no doubt due to the pathetic backtension from a Strong platter, but regardless you are most probably putting very fine lines into the film that you can't see with the light levels you have on your screens, but that doesn't mean you aren't causing film damage that will affect someone else's presentation.

Also the only thing the labs apply to the prints is something called Scotchguard or Photoguard or Imageguard (all basically the same thing). It is clear you don't know what FilmGuard is or how it works. Try a bottle and following the instructions (don't make up your own procedure) use it on a couple of prints and you will be very surprised at how good 35mm film can look. It is impossible to achieve that "FilmGuard look" with any other product.

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 09-30-2008 05:57 PM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Oliver Harper
but they often have film guard applied to them by the lab
No they don't. Film Guard is only applied by the theatres...those that give a rats ass about quality.

quote: Brad Miller
Also the only thing the labs apply to the prints is something called Scotchguard or Photoguard or Imageguard (all basically the same thing)
It amazes me that these processes are even still perceived to be of any effect, let alone still being used by the majors. Every one of the Australian prints of Wall-E have been treated with this useless application. It's not only managed to trap all the dirt under its coating, the 'scratch removal' effect doesn't work either...I had to reject a print with 5 lovely base scratches down the RHS of picture.

These prints are all on 2393 stock [thumbsup] yet they started out on day one looking the worst image on my screens (remembering Mamma Mia! had travelled 340 passes at this point and still looked brand new) and will leave the same way. [thumbsdown]

My untreated second-hand prints of Step Brothers, Angus Thongs and Perfect Snogging and The Bank Job started out with the aforementioned dirt and muck, but looked new 4 days into the seasons...all thanks to Film Guard.

So, those cinemas that care enough to spend money to clean properly are punished by having Photoguarded prints in circulation to somehow 'benefit' cinemas that couldn't care less.

As Mr. Spock would say...this is not logical.

 |  IP: Logged

John Koutsoumis
Master Film Handler

Posts: 261
From: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 09-30-2008 09:47 PM      Profile for John Koutsoumis   Email John Koutsoumis   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
John did you apply Filmguard to your print of Wall-E? I gave up after 2 days as the streaking would not go away where as the last few films I have run through the cleaner had no problems with streaking since I mastered the applying procedure.
There were no scratches on our Wall-E print but there was a lot of dirt in some parts. The film cleaner had no effect on the dirt. I should have known it had been treated as the each reel came sealed in plastic wrapping but all leaders had been cut. Kind of forgot that obvious sign [uhoh]
Our prints of the Bank Job and Welcome To The Sticks look amazing thanks to Filmguard.

[ 10-01-2008, 12:02 AM: Message edited by: John Koutsoumis ]

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 09-30-2008 10:29 PM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
No John, you cannot use Film Guard on a treated print. (By treated I mean Photo-guarded or the like). It cannot penetrate the useless coating they slap on these prints. Film Guard on these type of prints will look like water does on a polished car...streaky droplets. If you do miss one and inadvertently add FG to it, just leave it. Any trace of the FG should disappear within a day.

The plastic bag/spliced leaders thing happens with untreated second hand prints too. One dead giveaway that your print is treated is the toxic-smelling stench it gives off when you've opened the plastic or wind the film. It reeks of nastiness.

 |  IP: Logged

John Koutsoumis
Master Film Handler

Posts: 261
From: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 09-30-2008 11:59 PM      Profile for John Koutsoumis   Email John Koutsoumis   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks for that John. Yes any trace of Filmgurad on Wall-E has gone bar just a slight streak on opening Pixar logo. I wish I could tell distrbutors not to use such treatments on used prints as we have a far superior tool. Oh well.

 |  IP: Logged

System Notices
Forum Watchdog / Soup Nazi

Posts: 215

Registered: Apr 2004


 - posted 08-04-2010 10:21 PM      Profile for System Notices         Edit/Delete Post 

It has been 672 days since the last post.


 |  IP: Logged

David E. Nedrow
Master Film Handler

Posts: 368
From: Columbus, OH, USA
Registered: Oct 2008


 - posted 08-04-2010 10:21 PM      Profile for David E. Nedrow   Author's Homepage   Email David E. Nedrow   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Just to resurrect the green v. white media discussion.

Got a film cleaner about 4 weeks ago. It came packed with two rolls of white media "quilted for comfort". I had also ordered a box of green media. We had a super dirty print of City Island and I was afraid to re-use the initial pad after cleaning the print. The white pad was black and full of debris. So I ended up using the second white pad straight away, and used it through that final week.

When we brought INCEPTION in, I switched to a new pad, this time a green one. Saturated it, etc. After watching the film run, I noticed immediately that there were very fine scratches on the film. Nothing objectionable to the average theatre goer, but definitely noticeable to me. I had originally thought the scratches might just be uneven Film-Guard streaks, but wiping a section clean with de-natured alcohol definitely showed scratches.

When I ordered the green pads, I assumed they would be quilted like the white pads, but they aren't. As others have noted, the grit has no where to go. The scratches are clearly caused by surface grit on the pad, as the scratches will form and last for a few seconds until the grit has moved past. Then the scratch "fades out".

So, I'm with Brad on this one. I would recommend using only the white media.

-David

 |  IP: Logged

Manny Montes
Master Film Handler

Posts: 270
From: United States
Registered: Feb 2010


 - posted 08-07-2010 04:43 AM      Profile for Manny Montes   Email Manny Montes   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Used green pads once, caused light scratches. Threw the rest of the box away and ordered film-tech white media, I've never looked back. Reading the instructions i'm still fearful of continually re-using the same pads though, it says you should change the pads weekly, I like to change them every 3 days. We have 13 screens, I only have 1 cleaner, I run it on 5 screens each day with the newest prints getting the first coating for protection, then it works it's way around the booth. Once it hits all 13 screens I replace it because by then its usually incredibly dirty and i'm afraid of scratching a print.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 08-07-2010 12:39 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
You should change the pads, resoaking only once per week, assuming you are following the ideal guidelines...which stipulates only ONE print. If you are juggling the same media pads around to more than one print, you could scratch it.

Resaturating should always occur when you run a different print through the same pads, and only if the pads weren't very dirty to begin with from the last film you ran through it.

What people shouldn't be doing is running a set of freshly saturated pads on the same print more than once a week. Hope that helps.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.