Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Moving Prints Between Two Buildings (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Moving Prints Between Two Buildings
Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 08-11-2008 01:00 PM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It's a good idea, but some theatre owners refuse to spend money for such conveniences for their booth personnel.

Some places are just plain lucky to have clamps and other cheap forms of moving prints. Otherwise, it's the classic 6k reel usage for print transfers.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 08-11-2008 01:07 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
A platter reel costs about the same as two 6K reels, so there is really no excuse.

And yes Jim, they are still being made. Sounds like it is time to change dealers. With you being in CA, there shouldn't be any problem finding another dealer nearby.

 |  IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 08-11-2008 01:09 PM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
R.S. Engineering & Mfg sells them.

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 08-11-2008 01:14 PM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Two 6k reels costing $539.11,what RSEM is selling this thing for?

I'd be shot in the head if I presented this platter reel idea with my superiors...

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Slycord
Film God

Posts: 2986
From: 청주시, 경북도, South Korea
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 08-11-2008 01:58 PM      Profile for Chris Slycord   Email Chris Slycord   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Just because it's the size of 2 6K reels doesn't make it valid to call it "2 6K reels." You save time building up (no need for rewinding) and this thing could also be used in place of a donut/board for moving plattered prints.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-11-2008 02:04 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Except that you still need the 6k' reels even if you have the platter reels. The 6k' reels are needed for dealing with prints that come in tails-up and also for exchanging prints with changeover houses (assuming that the changeover houses can accommodate the large reels).

The platter reels are great, but really doesn't help with either of those issues.

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 08-11-2008 02:07 PM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Chris Slycord
You save time building up (no need for rewinding) and this thing could also be used in place of a donut/board for moving plattered prints
..and I won't argue on that one.

But sadly, the $$$ sign is more important to a lot of companies to be used somewhere else (mainly, for their own benefit than for the employee's benefit) and where money could be used in more useful places, it ususally gets spent where it really doesn't need to be at.

-Monte

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Slycord
Film God

Posts: 2986
From: 청주시, 경북도, South Korea
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 08-11-2008 02:21 PM      Profile for Chris Slycord   Email Chris Slycord   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If prints get built up quicker don't they save payroll?

 |  IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 08-11-2008 02:57 PM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I can see where if you just say "I need a $600 platter reel" the bean counters would reflexively reply "No".

OTOH, if you give them a cost-benefit justification that shows the reel paying for itself in a reasonable period of time by, for example, reducing their labor cost, thus making the theater more profitable, that's something they can understand. If it also helps the presentation, that's a bonus.

 |  IP: Logged

Jim Cassedy
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1661
From: San Francisco, CA
Registered: Dec 2006


 - posted 08-11-2008 03:44 PM      Profile for Jim Cassedy   Email Jim Cassedy   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Chris Slycord
If prints get built up quicker don't they save payroll?
Not necessarily.

I'm aware of at least two theaters here in San Francisco that pay a flat "bonus" rate to the platter-jockey who gets stuck making up or breaking prints.

So they get paid the same regardless of if it takes them 30min or 2hrs.

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Slycord
Film God

Posts: 2986
From: 청주시, 경북도, South Korea
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 08-11-2008 04:15 PM      Profile for Chris Slycord   Email Chris Slycord   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well of course if the person who's doing the build-ups was going to be there regardless for his normal shift and was building up in addition to his/her normal duties then yeah saving time wouldn't save $.

Then again, if you made it so that dealing with the build-up was no big deal (due to it taking far less time for the operator) you could remove that extra bonus fee I would think.

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Gabel
Film God

Posts: 3873
From: Technicolor / Postworks NY, USA
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 08-11-2008 04:19 PM      Profile for Bill Gabel   Email Bill Gabel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
We got paid for a build-up and a teardown when we moved a prints between buildings. And at select locations we got paid for the moves (buildups & teardowns) of prints within a theatre in one of those large palaces that was plexed with a booth in the former balconey. And the chains paid for build-ups and teardowns on regular engagements, plus your regular hourly rate at the theatre.

 |  IP: Logged

Justin Hamaker
Film God

Posts: 2253
From: Lakeport, CA USA
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted 08-11-2008 04:48 PM      Profile for Justin Hamaker   Author's Homepage   Email Justin Hamaker   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
From my perspective, the main advantage of a platter reel is when you get those sub-run prints on Friday morning that have to be on screen 90 minutes after you receive them . While the reels certainly save time over building up on 6K reels, I don't feel like it saves a ton of time - certainly not enough time to justify the cost when build up is usually just part of the daily routine of someone who is going to be on site anyways.

Don't misunderstand me, I'm certainly glad my boss was willing to buy one. I'm just saying that I don't think the labor savings is enough to justify spending $500.

For Jim: I believe we purchased ours the Harrah's Theatre Supply.

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 08-11-2008 09:38 PM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: David Stambaugh
reducing their labor cost, thus making the theater more profitable, that's something they can understand. If it also helps the presentation, that's a bonus.

Oh, do fully agree with you Dave on this, just that the actual payoff that some of the bean counters (and they count every bean-big and small) will ask is: "If getting this device increases the tix sales whereas the previous method of clamps and board have proven itself to be a dependable method of doing film moves, then it will be worth it. Otherwise, it 's just money tossed out the door." (and this attitude goes along on the same breath of doing booth modification that could increase tix sales, but they see that things are going okey, why change it out...)

And by that, sadly, they are just seeing projection staff as just people doing their job and nothing else.

Goes back to the old saying that a cynic is a person who knows the price of everything, but knows the value of nothing.

Personally, I would love to have one of these devices, but unfortunately, I don't have a main booth that I work in all the time - just watch over others plus the one I work at..and this would be the main reason of not getting one since to have others trained and learned out on how to handle a device would be complicated to these other booth locations. To them, doing clamps and boards is just easy enough for the booth jockeys to handle.
-Monte

 |  IP: Logged

James R. Hammonds, Jr
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 931
From: Houston, TX, USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 08-11-2008 10:01 PM      Profile for James R. Hammonds, Jr   Email James R. Hammonds, Jr   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have one question about taking up on the platter reel.
How do you secure it to the platter.
Since different types of platters use different types of rings, wouldn't the holes for the center ring be spaced differently for each one?

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.