Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Bolt Released Digital Only (Page 3)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Bolt Released Digital Only
Galen Murphy-Fahlgren
Master Film Handler

Posts: 405
From: Canton, MI, USA
Registered: Oct 2007


 - posted 10-01-2008 10:12 AM      Profile for Galen Murphy-Fahlgren   Email Galen Murphy-Fahlgren   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mark J. Marshall
Galen,

Out of curiosity, what 35mm 3D setups and movies have you seen?

Spy Kids 3D is the only thing that comes to mind. I can't recall where I saw it, and since I didn't work in theaters at the time, I have no idea what their setup might have been. It was probably a Showcase, and the Showcases in my area are not highly reputable.

quote: Frank Angel
"Well documented" by whom?
Frank, I was referring to my general contempt for the DLP that was in use at my previous theater. If you do a little digging, you'll probably find a half dozen threads where I discuss that and the 2.5-3.5 effective FL it supposedly presented.

I'm not saying that there isn't a magnificent 35mm 3D system out there, I'm just saying that for almost all theaters, digital is the way to go. Most people don't have the expertise to run a two projector setup, and the investment is only useful for running 3D. I happen to think there is not much other reason to go 2k DLP, but chain owners seem to think there is. Clearly I prefer 35mm to 2k DLP, and I truly believe that it will continue to have a place in exhibition for the foreseeable future, but for all but the most exceptional theaters DLP 3D is probably better.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark J. Marshall
Film God

Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 10-01-2008 10:26 AM      Profile for Mark J. Marshall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
With all due respect, you're comparing apples and oranges, Galen. Spy Kids 3D was anaglyphic in 35mm. You could easily show that anaglyphic movie on a DLP projector in anaglyphic 3D, and the 3D would still suck. That's not the 35mm projector's fault.

I agree with Frank. Get yourself to see a dual strip 35mm 3D show or two when you can. They come up from time to time. I think you'll be surprised at how good it can look.

I for one would like to see a live action movie that was shot in 3D projected on two DLP projectors. I bet that looks pretty cool when done right.

 |  IP: Logged

Galen Murphy-Fahlgren
Master Film Handler

Posts: 405
From: Canton, MI, USA
Registered: Oct 2007


 - posted 10-01-2008 01:13 PM      Profile for Galen Murphy-Fahlgren   Email Galen Murphy-Fahlgren   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I suppose it isn't an even comparison, but I think it holds some credence since anaglyph seems to be the most widely used form of 35mm 3D, and Real D and Dolby are the common DLP formats. I don't even know of any theaters in my area equipped to show dual strip, although the museum may be. I can't see into their booth at all and I don't think I give them enough money for a tour, although I guess I could try asking.

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Slycord
Film God

Posts: 2986
From: 청주시, 경북도, South Korea
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 10-01-2008 04:09 PM      Profile for Chris Slycord   Email Chris Slycord   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
To be fair, though, your first comment in this discussion was directly responding to someone mentioning dual-strip 3D. That's why they jumped on your case about it even if you are completely right about the anaglyph method sucking.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 10-01-2008 11:09 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Also, the analglyphic style of 3D for 35mm is not the most common nor most popular. Yes it was used recently but that was to avoid having to equip the theatre with a silver screen and printing over/under prints. But it certainly would be doable in this day and age...for a lot less cost than digital.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Vaughn Hamrick
Film Handler

Posts: 21
From: Jacksonville , Florida USA
Registered: Dec 2006


 - posted 10-02-2008 01:16 PM      Profile for Vaughn Hamrick   Email Vaughn Hamrick   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks for all the informative replies, folks. We ran Shark Boy and Spy Kids when they came out, but not in 3 D.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark J. Marshall
Film God

Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 10-02-2008 01:18 PM      Profile for Mark J. Marshall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I didn't realize that they were available as 2D.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.