Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Prints of "Benjamin Button" to be locked...Here we go again... (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1  2  3  4  5 
 
Author Topic: Prints of "Benjamin Button" to be locked...Here we go again...
Ron Lacheur
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 650
From: British Columbia, Canada
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 12-15-2008 09:45 PM      Profile for Ron Lacheur   Email Ron Lacheur   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
British Columbia Film Classification is listing it as 166 mins.

 |  IP: Logged

Phil Ranucci
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 236
From: Carpinteria,CA, United States
Registered: May 2006


 - posted 12-15-2008 11:05 PM      Profile for Phil Ranucci   Email Phil Ranucci   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Maybe the Canadian version goes back to his conception!

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 12-16-2008 12:28 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Brad Miller
let the spinning of the payout pull the last reels on.
A few months back we had a jittery reel 6 of the latest Spike Lee Joint. It was an 8 reel movie. Our replacement reel 6 arrived about 8 minutes or so before the show start. I already had removed the bad reel 6 and had reels 7 and 8 on a 7000' reel. I loaded reel 6 on, threaded, spliced reel 7 to reel 6 and started. The payout dragged reels 7 and 8 on. All 12 people were able to gain full dissatisfaction of the overlong joint because of my heroic actions!

 |  IP: Logged

Bernie Anderson Jr
Master Film Handler

Posts: 435
From: Woodbridge, New Jersey
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 12-16-2008 08:13 AM      Profile for Bernie Anderson Jr   Author's Homepage   Email Bernie Anderson Jr   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Brad,

You're talking about splicing the remaining reels on while the movie is running. How do you splice the remaining reels on while its spinning with out the print brainwrapping. Interesting idea.

Bernie

 |  IP: Logged

Tyler Potts
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 159
From: Anderson, SC, USA
Registered: Sep 2008


 - posted 12-16-2008 09:10 AM      Profile for Tyler Potts   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I dunno... but I want to try it this weekend!

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 12-16-2008 09:45 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Okay...I ran this thing last night (all three cans of mine were locked, HA!). I think you'll find that the 166 running time is correct to the end of the credits. None of the reels are packed though most are reasonably full. Reel 5 is probably the shortest. FWIW...Scope, quad-track (in the USA, at least).

Watch your framing...it feels like somebody scribed the wrong lines on the camera when they composed this one...you feel like you are often framed too high. The overall look of this film is just weird (color, composition, you name it). There is also a mixture of anamorphic and spherical photography...sometimes inter-cut in a common scene...I don't know if I've seen that before (other than some 70mm/35mm stuff in Far and Away).

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Michael McGovern
Film Handler

Posts: 57
From: New Britain, CT, USA
Registered: May 2008


 - posted 12-16-2008 11:12 AM      Profile for Michael McGovern     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Great, as if I'm not already going to be at the theater all day long on Christmas Eve building multiple prints of Bedtime Stories, and The Spirit, and this movie, and Valkyire, and Marley, etc. etc. etc. God forbid I should want to spend soem time with the family. Oh well, I guess those are the breaks.

 |  IP: Logged

Anslem Rayburn
Master Film Handler

Posts: 476
From: Yuma, AZ, USA
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 12-16-2008 11:33 AM      Profile for Anslem Rayburn   Email Anslem Rayburn   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
As for Benjamin Button, well...huh.
Has anyone bugged Paramount about this? Or the Paramount people at DFS? I'm curious what they say. It really seems like a strategy that would make sense for a movie opening the Friday after Christmas (like, say, Revolutionary Road or Valkyrie)...

Valkyrie opens Christmas Day.

Link

 |  IP: Logged

Blaine Young
Master Film Handler

Posts: 477
From: Kirkland, WA, USA
Registered: Sep 2006


 - posted 12-16-2008 12:08 PM      Profile for Blaine Young   Email Blaine Young   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Valkyrie has had multiple release dates. Although the change to 12/25 from 12/26 seems to be noted only in the Television commercials. BoxOfficeMojo still shows the 26th, but the latest ScoreBoard (Dated 12/12) does show the 25th.

But I'm right there with Michael McG. We're scheduled to open "Benjamin Button", "Gran Torino", "The Reader", "Valkyrie", "Frost/Nixon", "Marley & Me", "Spirit" and "Bedtime Stories" all on Christmas Day...

 |  IP: Logged

Jonathan M. Crist
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 531
From: Hershey, PA, USA
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 12-16-2008 12:10 PM      Profile for Jonathan M. Crist   Email Jonathan M. Crist   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
What happens if the employees at the film depot mistakenly put the trailers and Reels 1, 2 and 3 in the locked can?

 |  IP: Logged

Tyler Potts
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 159
From: Anderson, SC, USA
Registered: Sep 2008


 - posted 12-16-2008 02:11 PM      Profile for Tyler Potts   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 


[ 03-10-2009, 10:55 AM: Message edited by: Tyler Potts ]

 |  IP: Logged

Blaine Young
Master Film Handler

Posts: 477
From: Kirkland, WA, USA
Registered: Sep 2006


 - posted 12-16-2008 02:15 PM      Profile for Blaine Young   Email Blaine Young   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
So now after a bit more research, I've found running times of 159, 166, 167 & 168 minutes. Has anyone run an advanced screening that they timed?

 |  IP: Logged

Adam Martin
I'm not even gonna point out the irony.

Posts: 3686
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 12-16-2008 05:56 PM      Profile for Adam Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Adam Martin       Edit/Delete Post 
Ummm ...

quote: Steve Guttag
I ran this thing last night (all three cans of mine were locked, HA!). I think you'll find that the 166 running time is correct to the end of the credits.

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 12-16-2008 06:47 PM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Distributors here say 165. [Roll Eyes]

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 12-16-2008 07:18 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'll be honest here...I don't think I have a down to the minute running time. Also, were as my print was a screening one...things could be different...though it was not an EK by any stretch. 166 feels about right though (to the end of the credits). The machines I was running are dead on at 24fps too (strobe verified).

Build up and break down time were nearly instantaneous [Wink] Ah 2-projectors...my friend!

Steve

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1  2  3  4  5 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.