Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Osram Xtreme Xplosion lamps (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Osram Xtreme Xplosion lamps
Jeremy Weigel
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1062
From: Edmond, OK, USA
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 01-22-2009 11:15 PM      Profile for Jeremy Weigel   Email Jeremy Weigel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
LTI is/was (I think I read somewhere they are/were being bought by Phillips) a subsidiary of Strong.

 |  IP: Logged

Ken McFall
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 615
From: Haringey, London.
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 01-23-2009 09:56 AM      Profile for Ken McFall   Email Ken McFall   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Every site I deal with has always gone Osram lamps on my recommendation with NO problems at all.

I changed a 2k lamp this morning that had 3600 hrs, some 27 months which was clear and the anode looked as new. There was nothing wrong with the light and the lamp striked first time every time. It was changed as the owner felt he'd had more than his money's worth from it.

Of all the lamps I've ever used Osram is the only one I can honestly recommend based on my experience and that of others I respect.

While there has been a few who clearly don't like Osram I'm sure it must represent a very small percentage of the total out there.

It's common knowledge that you always hear complaints but seldom here of the shows that have no problems.

AS for lamps exploding, I was carrying a short 2k lamp in it's plastic tube in my hand. For no reason as I was walking to wards the projector to fit it, it exploded. It wasn't as big a bang as some might expect as the lamp was cold. It had possibly been given a bad knock and damaged a seal who knows.

And YES it was an Osram.

 |  IP: Logged

Tim Reed
Better Projection Pays

Posts: 5246
From: Northampton, PA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 01-23-2009 10:27 AM      Profile for Tim Reed   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Ken, I felt the same way about Osrams... up until a couple years ago. There have been an inordinately high number of premature failures with them in many installations I know of, as well as in my own theatres.

 |  IP: Logged

Pete Naples
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1565
From: Dunfermline, Scotland
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 01-23-2009 10:48 AM      Profile for Pete Naples   Email Pete Naples   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I concur with Mr McFall.

Perhaps like Guinness, they don't like to travel too far [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged

Jon P. Inghram
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 124
From: Wichita, KS USA
Registered: Jan 2007


 - posted 01-23-2009 12:00 PM      Profile for Jon P. Inghram   Email Jon P. Inghram   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The Osram 4k bulbs used to average over 4000 hours, with one almost hitting 7000, it's just this last set of bulbs has been very unreliable. We're apparently switching over (or at least experimenting with) ASL bulbs for the time being, with the subtle hint that we'll be using Christies "before too long".

I used my Fuji S100FS with a macro lens and a slave flash to get those close-ups.

 |  IP: Logged

Bastiaan Fleerkate
Film Handler

Posts: 85
From: Linschoten, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Registered: Jun 2006


 - posted 01-23-2009 12:38 PM      Profile for Bastiaan Fleerkate   Author's Homepage   Email Bastiaan Fleerkate   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
What about Ushio lamps?
How is the reputation of these lamps?

I've never had a lamp explode in the projector (we let some drop... and the lamp in our Panasonic beamer has blown up (tiny bits of glass inside projector that made purple blurry spots in the image)) and I hope it will never happen.
What a mess...!

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 01-23-2009 12:53 PM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Bastiaan Fleerkate
What about Ushio lamps?

I've ran 2500w Ushios (being the parent company of Christie...) and had some hit and misses with these bulbs - they either had the duration, or died prematurely due to seal leaks...

Thus, we went back to Christies. We used to burn Osrams, but had warranty issues with Osrams that swung us over to Christie and been using them since..

quote: Bastiaan Fleerkate
I've never had a lamp explode in the projector
It'll happen, I promise you. And when it does, it's an experience you'll never forget, especially if you're close by.

I had to "peel" an employee of mine off the ceiling when a 6k bulb let go and he was standing right next to the console. The entire complex (21 screens) heard that explosion. Interestingly enough, the shards barely scratched the mirror like the picts at the beginning of this topic when that 4k bulb let go.

-Monte

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-23-2009 01:53 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Ken McFall
I changed a 2k lamp this morning that had 3600 hrs, some 27 months which was clear and the anode looked as new.


They why on earth did you change it if it was still in such good shape? I've seen Christie/Ushio lamps go in excess of 20,000 hours and 7 years and they are still clear and stable. A customer has one at 26,000 hours as I type this... they also never explode even at these extreme hours. They eventually just become unstable.

I think what Tim said in another thread "False economy at work; "dropping dimes to pick up pennies." clearly applies to Osram products.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Moreno
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 200
From: culiacan sinaloa mexico
Registered: Jul 2008


 - posted 01-23-2009 02:47 PM      Profile for Mike Moreno   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Moreno   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I HAVE C4000 CONSOLES AND I CAN SAY THEY WORK FINE, AND I ALSO HAVE THE PROBLEM WITH OSRAM XBO 4000 IT HAPEN 2 TIMES. I THINK IS A DEFECTIVE LAMP

 |  IP: Logged

Ken McFall
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 615
From: Haringey, London.
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 01-23-2009 07:16 PM      Profile for Ken McFall   Email Ken McFall   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Mark it was changed simply because the owner felt he'd had his money from the lamp and that it was not worth the risk of running it way over it's life.

This is of course the opposite of what you often find today where lamps are run to the limit.

WHY?

A 2k lamp costs about £350 a cheap e53 mirror about £150. A half full house about £750. Do the maths a failure will cost you dearly. When you consider a lamp costs about £0.15 per hour it's lunacy to run them into the ground.

So what that you get another 200 hrs out of a lamp that's about £28.... peanuts.

That's why the lamp was changed... common sense.... not much of that about now-a-days.

 |  IP: Logged

Chase Taylor
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 175
From: Troy, Alabama, USA
Registered: Mar 2001


 - posted 01-23-2009 07:52 PM      Profile for Chase Taylor   Author's Homepage   Email Chase Taylor   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I just had a Osram XBO 3000W/DHP OFR blow up at 359 hours. It took out the reflector and UV Shield. Osram is not going to like that bill. [Eek!]

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-23-2009 10:00 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The bottom line if you can't afford to change the lamp when its warranty is up then you shouldn't be in business
With most lamps averaging only several dollars a show and in many cases less it should not be the make or break point nor is using the right microswitch in the platter

 |  IP: Logged

Tim Reed
Better Projection Pays

Posts: 5246
From: Northampton, PA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 01-23-2009 10:31 PM      Profile for Tim Reed   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hear! Hear!
quote: Bastiaan Fleerkate
What about Ushio lamps?
I service about 40 Digital Cinema screens. Probably half of those are using Ushio bulbs, and I have not had a single failure from them. At changing time, they come out mostly clear, sometimes with only the slightest hint of darkness in the envelope. (FWIW, the reason they are changed is because the DC integrator WANTS them changed.)

With the Osrams, however, I've had three catastrophic failures in the past 10 months and I know of at least 3 others in the same time period, in territories adjacent to mine. I wish it wasn't so. Osram must have changed something in their manufacturing materials or procedures, or gotten lax in their QC... but SOMETHING has definitely happened with those guys over the past couple of years. [Frown]

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-23-2009 10:59 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Gordon McLeod
The bottom line if you can't afford to change the lamp when its warranty is up then you shouldn't be in business


Gord,

That is just plain being belligerent! Even Christie allows an extra 10% over the rated warranted hours on their lamps... and even on the CDXL line of lamps.

Now lets see, at say 525.00 average price for a 2kw lamp and if it goes 20K hours that lamp costs .02625 per hour to operate or less than 1/4 the cost of operating Kens Osram lamp. I'd bet that lamp costs even went up substantially over that 7 years... So the theater owner than ran his Christie/Ushio for 20,000 hours and 7 years would have spent about $1575.00 US more on purchasing three extra new lamps in that 7 year time period if he pulled his lamps at the same time Ken does. Now thats REAL SAVINGS! Now believe me I don't agree on running lamps this long nor do I teach it but we do have customers that do and that is their choice. Their theory is that if the light on screen is still good, the lamp is stable, and the lamps don't have a history of explosions... then why pull it? The majority of our customers however do pull them at times like Ken specified. I just wanted to show all of you how much less it costs to run a Christie lamp then any of the others one can buy and how much more reliable they are.

P.S. Those of you that can remember the Marble lamps back in the 80's will also probably remember the incredibly high hours they achieved.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 01-24-2009 12:59 AM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
With the topic of the super high hours: What about quartz derivication (sp) - the risk of quartz failure which would cause gas loss or explosions?

Also when I was with EDW's with the usage of CHR 4k and 6K HTP bulbs: we had to change them out at 150% over warranty, mainly for the light output quality (which I agreed with) since, even the bulb looks physically good, the light color would get to be somewhat dull and slightly muddy looking in making the picture on the screen look like it lost a lot of contrast - giving it a more flat/blah look on the screen..

-Monte

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.