Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Silver screens (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Silver screens
Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-29-2009 08:42 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
We had other new screens that were defective and they DID replace them but they refused to replace this one. The new silver screen's surface is somehow printed onto the vinyl and it looks like a checkerboard effect! Real crap!

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Ron Curran
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 504
From: Springwood NSW Australia
Registered: Feb 2006


 - posted 05-29-2009 08:51 PM      Profile for Ron Curran   Author's Homepage   Email Ron Curran   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks Frank, you actually answered the question. I remember images looking excellent on a miracle mirror, except for the joins showing up in extra bright scenes.

They could be, as you said, the solution (sorry Joe) for today.

Surely we could do it better than they did in the 50s.

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-29-2009 09:29 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
mdi is part of STRONG now

 |  IP: Logged

Julio Roberto
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 938
From: Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Registered: Oct 2008


 - posted 05-29-2009 10:23 PM      Profile for Julio Roberto     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
For what it's worth, this is what MDI claims for their "3D" screens:

quote:

Features
• Gain of 2.3 on axis.
• Signal to Noise Ratio (S/N) exceeding 180.
• Excellent performance for 3D projection.
• Can bu used for 2D projection.
• Ideal for digital or 35 mm projection .
Lenticular surface and reduced hot spotting.
• Seams invisible under normal projection condition.
• Best versatility on the market.
• Quick delivery time

But the should really correct the spelling of the part that goes: "Can bu used" (SIC) [Roll Eyes]

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-30-2009 08:37 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Signal to Noise Ratio (S/N) exceeding 180.

Ha! No way... I've heard many an MDI silver screen hiss at me... I'd say no better than 68!

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Julio Roberto
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 938
From: Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Registered: Oct 2008


 - posted 05-30-2009 09:02 PM      Profile for Julio Roberto     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think they were probably referring at the crosstalk performance for 3D rather than sound (i.e. 180:1 polarization maintenance, instead of 180db), but who knows the way the specs are written is not crystal clear, to be honest.

[Shrug]

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-30-2009 09:26 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Julio...

I'm just kiddin with ya! However I have had screens hiss at me when you take the foam out when the layers unwind... It's dry here with alot of static.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Julio Roberto
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 938
From: Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Registered: Oct 2008


 - posted 05-30-2009 09:30 PM      Profile for Julio Roberto     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
[Razz]

 |  IP: Logged

Jack Ondracek
Film God

Posts: 2348
From: Port Orchard, WA, USA
Registered: Oct 2002


 - posted 05-30-2009 10:09 PM      Profile for Jack Ondracek   Author's Homepage   Email Jack Ondracek   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If they were going to use that kind of comparison, maybe a more correct description would be "crosstalk". ??

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 04-29-2010 09:02 AM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Does anyone have experience with silver screens lately (2010)? One vendor versus another?

My experiences are a mixed bag.

This from a guy who spent the last 30 years removing silver screens. Louis

 |  IP: Logged

Sam D. Chavez
Film God

Posts: 2153
From: Martinez, CA USA
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 04-29-2010 08:37 PM      Profile for Sam D. Chavez   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I just bought a 21 x 42 Severtson screen and it was perfect. Not a blemish anywhere and the screen fall off seemed quite good.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.