Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Moving a Projector (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Moving a Projector
Sally Ann Burgess
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 120
From: Queenstown, New Zealand
Registered: Apr 2008


 - posted 08-22-2009 03:12 AM      Profile for Sally Ann Burgess   Email Sally Ann Burgess   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks, guys. I have got my Tech hopefully coming in a few weeks so I'll wait and see what he says.

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 08-22-2009 03:45 AM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
On aperture filing: the trick to help knock off some of that shadow is to have the edges of the opening tapered - with the back side of the aperture plate having the taper to the opening.

Instead of filing straight across, you'd file in an upward direction to put a knife edge on all four edges with the taper on the back side of the aperture.

But, it still doesn't help since on some projectors that the aperture plate is way behind the film plane .. like on some Simplex XL units with the curved gates and those removable aperture plates. This is when masking is deeply needed.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 08-22-2009 04:04 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I don't think her problem is the aperture and I don't think she should touch it, BUT...

...I have also noticed that proper bulb focus can play an important role in aperture shadows. It can make HUGE shadows that definitely shouldn't be there and are usually corrected by proper adjustment and focus of the lamp, at least on Simplex XLs.

 |  IP: Logged

Sally Ann Burgess
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 120
From: Queenstown, New Zealand
Registered: Apr 2008


 - posted 08-22-2009 05:00 AM      Profile for Sally Ann Burgess   Email Sally Ann Burgess   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Interesting point about the bulb Joe. Monte I'm not going anywhere near the aperture but thanks!!!
Will look at bulb focus tomorrow and report back.

 |  IP: Logged

John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 08-22-2009 05:37 AM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Just to beat the dead horse, never file an aperture plate unless you have a brand new one to screw up (preferably a few).

Monte...your directions are not very helpful:
quote: Monte L Fullmer

Instead of filing straight across, you'd file in an upward direction to put a knife edge on all four edges with the taper on the back side of the aperture.

How is anyone supposed to know which direction is "upward"? And a taper necessarily goes in two directions. If you have a taper on the back, you will have a taper on the front (unless you taper only half the distance and then change the angle). One side will taper inwards and one side will taper outwards.

(But why are you encouraging Sally to try changing her aperture? No offense to Sally, but we shouldn't be recommending filing apertures to inexperienced people...especially not without a lot of warning and careful direction...there are plenty of older threads. It's too easy to screw up. Not to mention the fact that it sounds like her aperture here is just fine!)

I'm pretty sure you mean tapering such that the back of the plate is larger than the front, i.e. the side of the plate nearest the film tapers outwards.

--jhawk

 |  IP: Logged

Andy Bajew
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 136
From: Bellaire, Texas
Registered: Jun 2009


 - posted 08-22-2009 09:49 AM      Profile for Andy Bajew   Email Andy Bajew   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
With the greatest of respect John, but I completely disagree and feel like I should defend myself and others with your statement about not letting inexperienced people file the aperture plate. Obviously, you won't let a trainee do it, but if they understand how the image is projected and and ratio of aperture size to screen size, then the average projectionist could file an aperture plate. It is just that you need an average projectionist who has a lot of patience, time and a little obsessive compulsion. The head projectionist of three years I replaced couldn't file an aperture plate--long before I replaced him I made two from scratch. Actually, when we first got our projectors we had someone who didn't know a single thing about projection file us all seven aperture plates.

 |  IP: Logged

Darryl Spicer
Film God

Posts: 3250
From: Lexington, KY, USA
Registered: Dec 2000


 - posted 08-22-2009 11:00 AM      Profile for Darryl Spicer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I agree with John, we shouldn't suggest filing a plate to someone who may have never done it. The big reason is because we are not their to see what he or she is seeing. You could have other issues that may need to be corrected that would not require the filing of the plates. The projector had an original position when it was installed and plates were filed for it. Over time, depending on the type of floor and other things, the picture image can shift. This does not mean you go and file a plate. You have to make corrections in other places like lens turrets or console height adjustments and shifts side to side. If the projector was not set up correctly in the beginning and then you re-set it up correctly later then aperture plates will need to be replaced. Putting a file in the wrong hands can piss off a tech in the future.

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 08-22-2009 12:42 PM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm not really trying to suggest anything and sorry if it came out that way. Just showing how other techs have trimmed plates.

 |  IP: Logged

Eric Robinson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 538
From: Santa Rosa, CA
Registered: Jan 2005


 - posted 08-25-2009 02:03 AM      Profile for Eric Robinson   Email Eric Robinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Sometimes learning the hard way is the best way. Otherwise you just follow someones rules which might be right or wrong. Who knows.

I made many a mistake when I first took on aperture plates...stupid ones like filing a flat aperture plate when the masking was set to scope. Filing a plate when the lens was out of focus. etc...

Certainly it is not a trivial task and it should not be regarded as such. Indeed techs don't like showing up and finding all of the aperture plates ruined.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.