Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Shaking Vic 5 (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Shaking Vic 5
Marco Giustini
Film God

Posts: 2713
From: Reading, UK
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 10-15-2009 02:39 AM      Profile for Marco Giustini   Email Marco Giustini   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I usually draw a white line between the shutter and the locking plaque after the first rough adjustment. This helps understanding how much I'm moving the shutter when I loose the screws. If you don't have a reference, when you loose the screws you do not realize that the shutter has moved a bit. And do not tight the belts AFTER setting the shutter, do it before!

 |  IP: Logged

Dominic Espinosa
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1172
From: California, U.S.A.
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted 10-15-2009 07:10 PM      Profile for Dominic Espinosa   Email Dominic Espinosa   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, after much fanfare our machine is in much better shape.
There still seems to be a small bit of latterral instability in the image that I haven't tracked the source of yet but it's SIGNIFICANTLY better than it was.

I am concerned because it's unstable still that the intermittent may have been only a symptom and not the true cause. And I am concerned the new one will become bad sooner rather than later in the same way.

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-15-2009 08:10 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Which version of gate and trap do you have

 |  IP: Logged

Marco Giustini
Film God

Posts: 2713
From: Reading, UK
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 10-16-2009 02:48 AM      Profile for Marco Giustini   Email Marco Giustini   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I don't think that there was the possibility to damage the intermittent of a V5 by external factors...

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-16-2009 09:58 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
An intermitent can be damaged by external factors by objects hitting the sprocket film pile ups

 |  IP: Logged

Damien Taylor
Master Film Handler

Posts: 493
From: Perth, Western Australia
Registered: Apr 2007


 - posted 10-16-2009 10:24 PM      Profile for Damien Taylor   Email Damien Taylor   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
A toothbrush has found its way somewhere it should not be while the projector is running.

 |  IP: Logged

Marco Giustini
Film God

Posts: 2713
From: Reading, UK
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 10-17-2009 04:55 AM      Profile for Marco Giustini   Email Marco Giustini   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Sure, I mean that Dominc is concerned about a hidden cause (belt, runners...) that could damage this new intermittent unit as well.

Check that the roller under the intermittent sprocket is not pressing hard against the intermittent sprocket itself. It has a stop on the back and it should be set so as the roller does not touch the print.

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-17-2009 12:23 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If there is a eccentric idler it can put a pulsing stress on the movenents bearing on the drive side

 |  IP: Logged

Dominic Espinosa
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1172
From: California, U.S.A.
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted 01-12-2010 11:16 PM      Profile for Dominic Espinosa   Email Dominic Espinosa   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Gordon,

Haven't been on this machine for a while. Was running digital in this house.

All I can tell so far is that it's a straight gate.

I'll check later tonight for a part #.

 |  IP: Logged

Phil Blake
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 558
From: esperance western australia
Registered: Nov 2003


 - posted 01-16-2010 01:19 AM      Profile for Phil Blake   Author's Homepage   Email Phil Blake   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
and i have discovered that not all intermittents are made equal...
our of my 3 vic 5's one was very noisy ,hammering and unstable image.

i removed the assembley and took it apart on the bench ( i can hear the techs groaning) after carefull inspection found the maltese cross to be binding on its shaft , i gently cleaned the shaft with very fine wet and dry paper , reassembled everything , now that machine runs the best out of my 3 it is so quiet now.

phil

 |  IP: Logged

Demetris Thoupis
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1240
From: Aradippou, Larnaca, Cyprus
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 01-16-2010 02:01 AM      Profile for Demetris Thoupis   Email Demetris Thoupis   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Oil in the intermittent should be periodicaly changed at 500 hours to reduce the possibility of the oil thickenning and becoming a residue on the maltese cross pin. Unfortunately most ppl thing the projectors are meant to run forever without any maintenance or very little. The way I do it and never had a V5 fail is to do this
Change intermittent oil every 500 Hours

1st year in operation rotate Belts and intermittent sprocket so they both rotate the oposite way. Thorough clean of projector. Re-Grease the shutter assembly

2nd year in operation change belts and intermittent sprocket completely. If it is a curved gate change the springs. Re-Grease the shutter assembly.

And 3rd year in operation I ususally make a very thorough clean of all parts by completely removing them and putting them back together. It is a time consuming process but its worth it and also redo the procedures for year 1 in operation and make the cycle over again.

Demetris

 |  IP: Logged

Dominic Espinosa
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1172
From: California, U.S.A.
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted 02-05-2010 11:46 PM      Profile for Dominic Espinosa   Email Dominic Espinosa   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, after much ado we did the simple thing: swapped out the gate/trap assembly.

It's strange because most of the components in the old assembly had been replaced by another tech in attempt to steady the image.

No more shake and much quieter now.

 |  IP: Logged

Demetris Thoupis
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1240
From: Aradippou, Larnaca, Cyprus
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 02-06-2010 12:00 AM      Profile for Demetris Thoupis   Email Demetris Thoupis   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I serviced an extremely shaky V4 the past few weeks. Even though the Intermittent did improve it, it was the gate trap that solved the shaking to 0. Keep that in mind.
Demetris

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 02-06-2010 10:19 AM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
V5 shaking? Don't they all shake? I am only kidding a little bit.

I saw V5 intermittents being built at the factory in Milan. The ones that were adjusted were fine. The other 96% caused belt oscillations enough to require constant shutter drive gear replacement. Rebuild or at least adjust all of them. Louis

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.