Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Can anyone identify the object between the lamp and projector here? (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Can anyone identify the object between the lamp and projector here?
Stephen Furley
Film God

Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 12-30-2009 06:31 AM      Profile for Stephen Furley   Email Stephen Furley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've just typed a reply, hit the wrong button, and lost it. [Frown]

quote: Mitchell Dvoskin
Whatever that gizmo is between the lamphouse and projector, it has an Alan Gordon Enterprises logo on it. They are still in business in LA, I suppose somebody could call or email them to find out what it is.

Alan Gordon Enterprises

My GUESS is that it is some sort of heavy duty heat shield to allow for freeze framing the image.

I tried saving the pictures and zooming in on the nameplates, but couldn't make out what it said. It probably helps if it's a name and logo that you know.

So far we have:

Two suggestions that it's a lamphouse. It certainly looks like one, but I don't think my idea that it's for a halogen lamp really makes sense with 35mm. Bernard's suggestion that it's for a small xenon is interesting, but if it's for a smaller lamp wouldn't the Orcon rectifier over-run it? If the lamp in the Orcon is the same size then why use the other lamphouse? It's possible that the Orcon has failed, but it looks in good condition, almost new, as does the rest of the equipment.

One suggestion that it's to correct for non-standard mirror. Wouldn't it be easier to replace the mirror? It's a standard lamphouse, and standard-size film. I think this would be more likely if it was illuminating something non-standard like 28mm film, or the works from a video projector, which somebody was trying to get more light into. Also, the cables look rather too thin for a lamp.

Two suggestions that it's for adjustable colour filters. Sounds plausible, but I can't see any way to adjust the filters, either three knobs to do it locally, or some means for remote control, a thickish cable with multi-pole connectors maybe, or even mechanical cables as used on bicycle brakes; can't think of the name for them now.

One suggetion that it's for neutral density filters. Again, sounds plausible, and the same arguments apply as for colour filters.

One suggestion that it's a spacer to facilitate access to the lamp. I think this is unlikely; what are the wires for? Changing the lamp the conventional way isn't difficult, and doesn't have to be done very often, unless this is used for some portable application, in which case the extra box itself is a nuisance anyway. The lamp would be in the wrong position, which would require a lens to correct it; this might explain the wires if they were for a fan to cool it, but this itself might then require re-alignment after changing a lamp. It really doesn't seem to make life any easier.

Five suggestions that it's some sort of cooling device. Three of the people who suggested this mentioned still-framing, which would make sense, since this seems to be some sort of studio machine; motor on top spool and cloverleaf bottom spoolbox. It wouldn't be needed for running film normally with such a small lamp, or all projectors would need one, which they clearly don't.

I'm still surprised that nobody here has been able to positively identify it. Of course it's possible that it's some one-off set-up that somebody has put together, e.g. a small lamphouse that somebody has stripped out and used to hold filters of some sort, in which case asking the maker may not help. Zooming in on this thing the black side plates do not look original. I can't be sure, but they also look like plastic, which would suggest that there's probably not a lamp in there, since they'd get rather hot.

I think at the moment I'm leaning towards the cooling device, with the colour filters as the next most likely, but I still can't see any way to operate them.

If it does turn out to be a cooling device then Ian was the first to suggest it, and indeed, it was the first suggestion made.

 |  IP: Logged

Ian Parfrey
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1049
From: Imbil Australia 26 deg 27' 42.66" S 152 deg 42' 23.40" E
Registered: Feb 2009


 - posted 12-30-2009 07:56 AM      Profile for Ian Parfrey   Email Ian Parfrey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Stephen.

I've had another look at this thing and from what I can tell, the top piece of the "box-thing" is off another Orcon lamphouse like the one behind it. Inside these are a large computer fan used to cool the power supply and for xenon heat extraction in the Orcons, so at a guess the wires - instead of dropping down from underneath the fan housing and into the original supply- are in this instance brought out the side and to the outboard power supply.

I'm leaning towards a 45 degree, angled dichroic filter in that box which would reflect the IR out the top and through the fan to be exhausted, similar to the Xebex HiBeam IV lamphouse setup.

With that said, then what stock would be so sensitive to heat that it would require a 1000w max lamp with dichroic filtering apart from nitrate? As there aren't any magazines on the Century, then it would be madness to even try and run nitrate on that setup.

And anyway, the Century has water cooling so why the dichroic filtering if any? Surely it would be far easier to cool the gate with the water jacket in the projector head than go to the expense of fabricating a seperate unit?

The manual for the 1600B model lamphouse states that the aperture to bulkhead distance should be approximately 8" ( 20.3 cm), and it appears that the present position of the Orcon far exceeds that recommended distance. This particular model lamphouse doesn't appear to be the 1600B model but the 1000 model. In which case, the aperture to bulkhead distance is likely to be shorter, not longer which is where it resides now.

Additionally, I doubt that the "box-thing" would be a beam expander as the Century doesn't appear to be a 35/70mm model.

This is turning out to be quite the puzzler!

The game's afoot, Watson.

 |  IP: Logged

Stephen Furley
Film God

Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 12-30-2009 08:26 AM      Profile for Stephen Furley   Email Stephen Furley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Now somebody has made another post I can correct the error in my previous one. The sentence 'Also, the cables look rather too thin for a lamp' should of course be at the end of the previous paragraph, not where I actually inserted it.

quote: Ian Parfrey
With that said, then what stock would be so sensitive to heat that it would require a 1000w max lamp with dichroic filtering apart from nitrate? As there aren't any magazines on the Century, then it would be madness to even try and run nitrate on that setup.

And anyway, the Century has water cooling so why the dichroic filtering if any? Surely it would be far easier to cool the gate with the water jacket in the projector head than go to the expense of fabricating a seperate unit?

Ian, to answer the second point first, water-cooling would reduce the temperature of the gate, but would not reduce the direct radiant heat on the film itself. As to what sort of stock would be so sensitive as to need this, three people have suggested stock which is not moving. Given that this seems to be some sort of studio machine, with rock and roll facilities, I'm leaning towards this being the most likely explanation, and it's to enable a still frame to be held in the gate, but we still don't know for sure. You're right, that does look like the top of an Orcon, mounted in reverse. I hadn't noticed that.

By the way Ian, are you posting this in the middle of the night? It was 14:26 in London when it arrived.

 |  IP: Logged

Ian Parfrey
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1049
From: Imbil Australia 26 deg 27' 42.66" S 152 deg 42' 23.40" E
Registered: Feb 2009


 - posted 12-30-2009 08:55 AM      Profile for Ian Parfrey   Email Ian Parfrey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Stephen.

Good call on the "rock and roll" capability. I had read those suggestions but it didn't click till I read your post.

Now that you mention it, the motor on the Century appears to have two supplies running to it which could point to the studio/lab projector theory.

Yes, it's 12:53AM Thursday morning here and I'm wondering about "box-things" and Orcons.

I have no life. [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged

Sean Weitzel
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 619
From: Vacaville, CA (1790 miles west of Rockwall)
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 12-30-2009 11:38 AM      Profile for Sean Weitzel   Email Sean Weitzel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I emailed the seller and asked about it but have not heard back. The actual auction has higher resolution photos, but not quite high enough to read the nameplate. For those interested it is ebay item: 200407710569

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=200407710569

 |  IP: Logged

Stephen Furley
Film God

Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 12-30-2009 11:45 AM      Profile for Stephen Furley   Email Stephen Furley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
No optical sound, doesn't look like it's got any mag sound either, and it's in a screening room in Los Angeles. Sounds even more like a studio machine. It's in nice clean condition.

 |  IP: Logged

Robert Throop
Master Film Handler

Posts: 412
From: Vernon, NY USA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 12-30-2009 12:44 PM      Profile for Robert Throop   Email Robert Throop   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The cutout in the projector door seems to indicate that it was an early Cine-Focus conversion.
Bob

 |  IP: Logged

Stephen Furley
Film God

Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 12-30-2009 01:04 PM      Profile for Stephen Furley   Email Stephen Furley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Robert Throop
The cutout in the projector door seems to indicate that it was an early Cine-Focus conversion.
[Confused]

What's that Bob?

 |  IP: Logged

Tony Bandiera Jr
Film God

Posts: 3067
From: Moreland Idaho
Registered: Apr 2004


 - posted 12-30-2009 01:24 PM      Profile for Tony Bandiera Jr   Email Tony Bandiera Jr   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Ok gang, since I'm local I have put in a call to the seller to get the answer to this mystery. I may also arrange to go see it in person if possible and will let you all know what I find out.

 |  IP: Logged

Richard Hamilton
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1341
From: Evansville, Indiana
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 12-30-2009 02:02 PM      Profile for Richard Hamilton   Email Richard Hamilton   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It's got a switch labeled "home". I assume that you click your heels together and push that button and wind up at home? [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged

Sam D. Chavez
Film God

Posts: 2153
From: Martinez, CA USA
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 12-30-2009 08:42 PM      Profile for Sam D. Chavez   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It appears that the black metal duct? coming into the bottom of the picture head is an air inlet/outlet. Why I have not a clue, but perhaps this was part of the "Cine Focus" style cooling or maybe to cool the film frame when it is in still frame or slow frame rate mode.

There is no stock water cooling shown.

 |  IP: Logged

Ken McFall
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 615
From: Haringey, London.
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 12-31-2009 11:33 AM      Profile for Ken McFall   Email Ken McFall   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Given that the lamphouse is going to be miles out of focus in relation to the gate could it be some sort of defuser to improve the uniformity of the light.

That would take care of the focus of the lasmphouse. It would also account for the exhaust fan on the top of the box as the static optics inside would have to deal with all of the heat.

As the projector is used to run rushes and un married prints the best possible image would be required.

Regards.

 |  IP: Logged

Robert Throop
Master Film Handler

Posts: 412
From: Vernon, NY USA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 12-31-2009 11:44 AM      Profile for Robert Throop   Email Robert Throop   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Stephen Furley

What's that Bob?

Cine Focus was a device developed by Century for controlling the position of the film in the gate. It used air pressure supplied by a blower to prevent film flutter. The later versions after about 1966 had knockouts in the projector casting for the hose fittings. The early version had a modified lens holder and a cutout in the projector door for the fitting.
Bob

 |  IP: Logged

Stephen Furley
Film God

Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 12-31-2009 12:45 PM      Profile for Stephen Furley   Email Stephen Furley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Did it work?

 |  IP: Logged

Jack Theakston
Master Film Handler

Posts: 411
From: New York, USA
Registered: Sep 2007


 - posted 12-31-2009 01:11 PM      Profile for Jack Theakston   Email Jack Theakston   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It occurred to me that there is something hanging off the front of the lens or on the port. Could that have something to do with it?

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.