Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Lamphouse wire size and type (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Lamphouse wire size and type
Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 01-02-2010 10:51 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The Coleman brand cable we use is indeed 600V rated and is "welding" cable.

 |  IP: Logged

Ian Parfrey
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1049
From: Imbil Australia 26 deg 27' 42.66" S 152 deg 42' 23.40" E
Registered: Feb 2009


 - posted 01-03-2010 01:10 AM      Profile for Ian Parfrey   Email Ian Parfrey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
John.

quote: John Hawkinson
Why do you ask? I guess we can measure it easily enough.

I'm just interested in how far a high amperage DC run can be without too much drop.

One cinema I worked at had Irem's on the back of Bauer U3's and 4's. The run there was around 55-60' but I can't recall the drop over that distance.

 |  IP: Logged

John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 01-03-2010 02:27 AM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, I'm not totally sure what you mean. You can go as far as you want to go and take as much drop as you want to drop. Problems you run into:

#1 (obvious) if you get too much drop, then the voltage required on your rectifier to make the voltage you need at the lamphouse may be too much, and your rectifier can't support you.

#2 (subtle) if you have a lot of drop, that means you have ohmic heating (I^2*R) in your conductors, and as their temperature rises, then their resistance rises, leading to greater voltage drop. And for a typical rectifier, that is essentially maintaining a fixed output voltage, that means as the resistance changes, the effective voltage seen by the lamp drops over time, and that means the current draw from the lamp drops over time. So you could see, e.g., a lamp that spikes to 90A for the first two minutes and then falls back to 70A once the wires start cooking. (Obviously this is not a great place to be.)

Louis: I'm a little puzzled by your inrush concerns. What's the problem with overcurrenting the conductors for a few milliseconds? They won't heat up enough to be a problem, nor will they appreciably limit the current. At least, that's not been my experience and I don't see why it should happen fro ma theoretical standpoint. I assume you've seen a practical example of this behavior?

--jhawk

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 01-03-2010 09:30 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have no idea what the cable electricians used in our park installation other than it looks to be about #04, very flexible so I am assuming fairly high count strands with the run being about 50 ft from the IREMs to the lamphouses. They use twistlocks on at the rectifiers. We are burning 4500w.

Thing is, this wire does get warm to the touch and it stays that way as a kind of steady-state, never getting hot. This always worried me figuring there's more resistance than there should be, but it has never caused any problems -- voltage reads fine pulling correct amperage and it's been running that way since the installation so my assumption is that it ain't broke.....

No indication anywhere along the away that there is heat deterioration at the contact points, either in the lamphouse or at the large twist pigtails (it's all portable so the lamphouse has to be able to disconnect easily for break-down).

 -

The pigtail connections get warm as well. Do you think I should be concerned? Should this cable be replaced with a larger guage?

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 01-03-2010 10:23 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The cables will get warm...I would definitely get it to #2 or larger though for 4500 watts. Ask your electrician what he should use on 155A DC....likely he won't think #4.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 01-03-2010 11:38 AM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Frank: you should measure the voltage drop under load and see...measure the DC voltage at the rectifier, measure again at the lamphouse. How much do they differ?

Also, measure across connection points...remember that if you have 0.1 ohms of resistance, well at 155A amps that'd be 15 volts! So a little adds up. And it's easy to get a hundredth of an ohm here or there with a loose connection...

Cables should have their designation printed on the exterior. It can be tough to tell wire gauge by diameter, though. For instance, #4 THHN is .318" outside diameter. But #4 welding cable might be .380" from one manufacturer or 0.420" from another. And while you got there #2 THHN was was 0.378"...

When you say pigtails, you mean the Cam-Loks in your picture? It sounds worrysome to me if those are warm, yeah...

--jhawk

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-03-2010 03:16 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Gordon McLeod
actually welding cable must be in free air as its insulation is not rated for in flex
we buy what is CSA rated entertainment cable now days for our dc leads

In nearly 35 years I've only encountered a handful of locations in the USA where open DC cables were allowed. Even the Imax and Iwerks 400 amp cables(welding type)were installed in flex or conduit.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Phil Hill
I love my cootie bug

Posts: 7595
From: Hollywood, CA USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 01-03-2010 03:23 PM      Profile for Phil Hill   Email Phil Hill       Edit/Delete Post 
Mark is correct. All 1570 15kW installs that I did with a "remote" Rectifier, code required the cables to be in metal conduit.

I used 4/0 600V Carol SUPER VU-TRON WELDING CABLE cable.

Ummmm, jhawk... NO THHN! HA! [Razz]

 |  IP: Logged

Richard May
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1057
From: Floral Park, NY USA
Registered: Aug 2004


 - posted 01-03-2010 07:14 PM      Profile for Richard May   Email Richard May   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In almost every theater here on Long Island, they are NOT installed in any kind of covering.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 01-04-2010 11:49 PM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yah, John, the cam-locs in the pic -- they do get warm, but as I said, nothing seems unusual, such as any discoloration you might find if there were excessive heat at the contact points either in the lamphouse or at the cable connection clamps in the rectifiers. Although, you might recall we did have that relay in one of the IREMs blow up on us a few summers ago.

After that little fun evening, now when we pull everything out of storage in June, I routinely check the all the contacts there and in the lamphouse for any oxidation and corrosion -- everything lives in storage all year round except for the summer festival.

No idea about the voltage drop -- it will have to wait until next summer for me to test it.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-05-2010 08:22 AM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Richard May
In almost every theater here on Long Island, they are NOT installed in any kind of covering.
I think codes were more a little more liberal with allowing that not even too long ago. It was also common in the Chicago area on locally installed rectifiers. Codes regarding arc and xenon have tightened up a bit in the last 5 to ten years or so. It is also highly likely the inspector had no clue as to what he was looking at...

Frank,
They will get warm... that is ok... hot is not ok!

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 01-05-2010 12:10 PM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Never had an inspection at that site, Mark, it's all "portable" and that seems to allow for great leeway. Plus, it's city owned & operated. The city, unfortunately, doesn't inspect itself, or when it does, it might write up a violation, but it go nowhere; it simply vanishes.

In our theatre we had a major fire that gutted our entire office complex of 10 offices and a work islands and conference rooms. This suite has exits directly into one of the theatre's lobby and directly on top of another theatre. In a building housing four theatres which had a major fire, you would think there would be even a modicum of attention paid to the building's fire alarm system.

Not so -- The announciator system has every trouble light lit and the alarm siren and strobe were going off routinely two and three times a week giving false alarms. The solution that they came up with? They disabled the system....in a building that had already had a fire. The system has been disabled for at least two years now.

And the Fire Department KNOWS about it because I personally went out to a fire truck that was parked outside our theatre one day and ask one of the firemen who was standing outside the truck, who do I speak to about a serious violation, pointing to the building that still had smoke marred bricks above each of the windows. The captain stuck his head out of the truck and said, "You talk to me. Dave and Tommy, you go with this guy." I took them to the fire control panels, showed then all those pretty red LEDs lit up and the key switch set on DISABLE. They wrote it up and seemed very concerned, but that was the last I heard of it.

My solution? -- I just keep a fire extinguisher next to my desk at all times & know exactly what exit door closest to me I'll be running out of the minute I smell the slightest wiff of smoke. clear the place in 5 minutes.

 |  IP: Logged

Richard Hamilton
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1341
From: Evansville, Indiana
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 01-05-2010 01:47 PM      Profile for Richard Hamilton   Email Richard Hamilton   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Frank Angel
I'll be running out of the minute I smell the slightest wiff of smoke
[uhoh] pussy!

 |  IP: Logged

Phil Hill
I love my cootie bug

Posts: 7595
From: Hollywood, CA USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 01-05-2010 03:58 PM      Profile for Phil Hill   Email Phil Hill       Edit/Delete Post 
Rick, you're terrible! HA! [Wink] [Razz]

 |  IP: Logged

Ian Parfrey
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1049
From: Imbil Australia 26 deg 27' 42.66" S 152 deg 42' 23.40" E
Registered: Feb 2009


 - posted 01-05-2010 04:54 PM      Profile for Ian Parfrey   Email Ian Parfrey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Now, a REAL TECH would smell the smoke, empty the corporate drinks cabinet, consume contents of said cabinet, personally extinguish the conflagration using expended contents of cabinet contents, ensure the safe evacuation of all the cute co-workers and bask in the glory and physical adoration from the womenfolk in the building.

But hey, we can't all be Angels. [Big Grin] [beer]

Seriously, Frank has done all that is possible and within his power to bring his concerns to the appropriate authorities, and it is no reflection on Frank that his concern for safety is overwritten by the dumb-ass inanity of governmental institutions...these same institutions, co-incidently, that would come down like a ton-of-bricks should any of us even think of doing the same thing that they allow themselves to do (and get away with). If I was Frank, his own actions would be safely diarised and stored offsite for possible future use when the going gets nasty.

So, on to my movie review for this all-action crash bang wallop 3D spectacular....

CINEMA: Frank's Theatre
AUDITORIUM: 1, if still standing.
PRESENTATION: 35mm (Yay- real sprockety-type perforated plastic type stuff) Dobly Digital audio - "Does that sound like flames!?"
PRESENTATION PROBLEMS: None, except some smoke haze in the projection beam.
MANAGERIAL PROBLEMS: Now, where do we start!
RATING: Technician's concern for safety aspect - 8 stars out of 4
RATING: Management's concern for safety aspect - 0.1 stars out of 8

Comments: What can one say about the progress 3D has made to the Disaster genre of movie making? The visual effects of the flames licking the ceiling, the density of the smoke in the office alcoves, the charred remnants of co-workers all meld to produce an extremely powerful experience that makes one want to leap into the screen and grab those moronic, brain-dead beaurocratic dum-asses and throttle them.

One can only hope that this plot will remain the imagination of a creative filmmaker and never cross that third wall into the realm of reality.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.