|
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Finally, Datasat has a new snipe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 04-19-2011 10:17 AM
Yeah, I have a very difficult time seeing any point to going with the "Datasat" name for the DTS theatrical process. I only see it creating brand confusion for both viewers and even theater operators.
There are so many businesses making a go of it in the digital cinema market. The companies with the best brand equity (Dolby, Sony, etc.) certainly have some advantage over others with unfamiliar (and often unimaginative) names.
Over the past decade DTS has developed quite a lot of brand equity. Even if the average member of the general public doesn't understand what exactly DTS does they have definitely been exposed to the brand name countless numbers of times unless they've been living in a cave for the past decade.
The DTS logo is found in more places than ever before. In the 1990s it grew from just being seen in movie end credits (and sometimes the flying disc trailer before the show) to being printed on packaging for Laserdisc, DVDs, some music CDs and screened on the front panels of surround controllers and receivers. Today, the DTS logo can be found on just about any DVD or Blu-ray player, PS3 console, computer sound card packaging and other pieces of electronics hardware equipped with DTS decoding capability. Lately I've been seeing the DTS logo pop up on more and more HDTV sets. And that's with good reason since the vast majority of Hollywood releases on Blu-ray now have the audio encoded in DTS-HD.
The former DTS company, Datasat, may have been spun off from the company still calling itself DTS. Still, I think it's a bad marketing strategy to change the name of the theatrical unit. Ultimately it can hurt both companies. Datasat is an unfamiliar name that doesn't make me think of anything involving movie theaters at all. And the home unit of DTS ends up losing its link to the theatrical side of the movie industry, making the home brand less relevant in delivering movie audio.
We certainly don't see Dolby ditching the "Dolby" name on any of its home or theatrical processes. Instead Dolby is trying to apply brands like "Dolby Surround 7.1" to Linear PCM audio that was not invented by Dolby. And then it's funny when the Blu-ray is released the audio is DTS-HD Master Audio 7.1 instead of Dolby TrueHD 7.1. Oh well.
Many companies have been split apart yet maintained the same brand name to preserve brand equity. I think DTS and Datasat ought to be working together keep the DTS brand name alive in movie theaters as long as possible. Movie studios are itching to get rid of 35mm film prints. I think Datasat will have an easier time trying to market digital cinema oriented products under the DTS brand name, a brand with 18 years of history, instead of starting from scratch.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Schulz
Master Film Handler

Posts: 387
From: Los Angeles, CA USA
Registered: Sep 2003
|
posted 04-19-2011 02:32 PM
I can speak to a couple of the issues raised here, hopefully by way of clarification.
DTS, Inc. made the decision to exit the cinema business, in order to focus on the consumer electronics end of things. I can't really speak to their motivations for doing so, but that was the decision made by management at DTS, Inc. They sold the cinema business to a UK satellite telecommunications firm called Datasat Communications - which is where the Datasat Digital Entertainment moniker comes from. Interestingly, all of the old hands from DTS came over to Datasat - all of the staff who had been with the company from the early 90s are now with Datasat. We continue to support the inherited 35mm CD-based soundtrack business, as well as develop new audio products (seriously give the AP20 audio processor a listen - it is the best-sounding and most flexible cinema processor on the market). We are also manufacturing the DC20 D-Cinema server, and licensing use of our Digital Booking System, and have other products and services in the works.
Hopefully that explains a bit about where we're coming from.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|