Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Finally, Datasat has a new snipe (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Finally, Datasat has a new snipe
Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 04-17-2011 02:08 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Aaron, no they could not get into trouble.

quote: Brad Miller
SDDS had that REALLY long snipe that was something around 90 seconds.
The only SDDS snipe I've seen is the original WOOSH-WOOSH WOOSH-WOOSH - BAM - UPNOTE (I call it "The Triangle"). Really not impressive at all, but it was very short.

 |  IP: Logged

Marco Giustini
Film God

Posts: 2713
From: Reading, UK
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 04-18-2011 07:36 AM      Profile for Marco Giustini   Email Marco Giustini   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think the logo Brad is talking is the QUEST : a selection of the other three SDDS logos: way too long!

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 04-18-2011 10:41 AM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
With all the times I've seen movies shown with SDDS audio I saw SDDS trailers only a couple or so times. The AMC Grand 24 in Dallas used the SDDS snipes routinely when the theater first opened in 1995. But that was the only theater where I saw the trailer used. I saw the SDDS "quest" trailer only once: at the AMC Quail Springs Mall 24 in Oklahoma City. The snipe was attached to the front of The Matrix.

 |  IP: Logged

Kris Verhanneman
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 182
From: Belgium
Registered: Dec 2009


 - posted 04-18-2011 11:31 AM      Profile for Kris Verhanneman   Email Kris Verhanneman   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
We had also one for SDDS with a volcano.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 04-18-2011 06:07 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Any executive that OKs these things ought to be made to watch it about 100 times in a row and then see if he still likes it.

 |  IP: Logged

Jeremy Weigel
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1062
From: Edmond, OK, USA
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 04-18-2011 06:23 PM      Profile for Jeremy Weigel   Email Jeremy Weigel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The "Quest" trailer was also broken up into its 3 main sections: "Volcano", "Jungle" and "Underwater". We played the "Quest" for a long time and actually had a lot of positive feedback from customers.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Jentsch
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1061
From: New Berlin, WI, USA
Registered: Apr 2003


 - posted 04-19-2011 09:27 AM      Profile for Scott Jentsch   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Jentsch   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The new DTS trailer is unimpressive as presented, but maybe it's better in-theater.

I agree that Datasat is a goofy name, and the decision to turn away from years of branding was a bad one. Few enough people understood DTS, and now no one knows the Datasat name. Unless they're going to do a massive push to transition people from one brand to the other and to educate people as to why they should care, they shouldn't even advertise to the public and stick to just marketing to the industry instead.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 04-19-2011 10:17 AM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yeah, I have a very difficult time seeing any point to going with the "Datasat" name for the DTS theatrical process. I only see it creating brand confusion for both viewers and even theater operators.

There are so many businesses making a go of it in the digital cinema market. The companies with the best brand equity (Dolby, Sony, etc.) certainly have some advantage over others with unfamiliar (and often unimaginative) names.

Over the past decade DTS has developed quite a lot of brand equity. Even if the average member of the general public doesn't understand what exactly DTS does they have definitely been exposed to the brand name countless numbers of times unless they've been living in a cave for the past decade.

The DTS logo is found in more places than ever before. In the 1990s it grew from just being seen in movie end credits (and sometimes the flying disc trailer before the show) to being printed on packaging for Laserdisc, DVDs, some music CDs and screened on the front panels of surround controllers and receivers. Today, the DTS logo can be found on just about any DVD or Blu-ray player, PS3 console, computer sound card packaging and other pieces of electronics hardware equipped with DTS decoding capability. Lately I've been seeing the DTS logo pop up on more and more HDTV sets. And that's with good reason since the vast majority of Hollywood releases on Blu-ray now have the audio encoded in DTS-HD.

The former DTS company, Datasat, may have been spun off from the company still calling itself DTS. Still, I think it's a bad marketing strategy to change the name of the theatrical unit. Ultimately it can hurt both companies. Datasat is an unfamiliar name that doesn't make me think of anything involving movie theaters at all. And the home unit of DTS ends up losing its link to the theatrical side of the movie industry, making the home brand less relevant in delivering movie audio.

We certainly don't see Dolby ditching the "Dolby" name on any of its home or theatrical processes. Instead Dolby is trying to apply brands like "Dolby Surround 7.1" to Linear PCM audio that was not invented by Dolby. And then it's funny when the Blu-ray is released the audio is DTS-HD Master Audio 7.1 instead of Dolby TrueHD 7.1. Oh well.

Many companies have been split apart yet maintained the same brand name to preserve brand equity. I think DTS and Datasat ought to be working together keep the DTS brand name alive in movie theaters as long as possible. Movie studios are itching to get rid of 35mm film prints. I think Datasat will have an easier time trying to market digital cinema oriented products under the DTS brand name, a brand with 18 years of history, instead of starting from scratch.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 04-19-2011 01:06 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I agree. I've never liked the "Datasat" name, in fact I don't see why any company would want the word "data" as part of their name because it's pronounced two different ways by people -- some say "day-ta" and others say "dah-ta."

I guess it's a way to exploit the high-techness of the company, since the previous DTS name (even though it originally stood for Digital Theatre Systems) doesn't seem high-tech enough.

Maybe I should change the name of my theatre, so the public will know we are a high-tech outfit with digital projection. I was thinking of DigiRoxy, DataRoxy or maybe Digidataroxy. How about it Bobby, want to help me with a logo? [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged

Manny Knowles
"What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???"

Posts: 4247
From: Bloomington, IN, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 04-19-2011 02:06 PM      Profile for Manny Knowles   Email Manny Knowles   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
[Roll Eyes]

I shaved my legs for THAT !?

 |  IP: Logged

Daniel Schulz
Master Film Handler

Posts: 387
From: Los Angeles, CA USA
Registered: Sep 2003


 - posted 04-19-2011 02:32 PM      Profile for Daniel Schulz   Author's Homepage   Email Daniel Schulz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I can speak to a couple of the issues raised here, hopefully by way of clarification.

DTS, Inc. made the decision to exit the cinema business, in order to focus on the consumer electronics end of things. I can't really speak to their motivations for doing so, but that was the decision made by management at DTS, Inc. They sold the cinema business to a UK satellite telecommunications firm called Datasat Communications - which is where the Datasat Digital Entertainment moniker comes from. Interestingly, all of the old hands from DTS came over to Datasat - all of the staff who had been with the company from the early 90s are now with Datasat. We continue to support the inherited 35mm CD-based soundtrack business, as well as develop new audio products (seriously give the AP20 audio processor a listen - it is the best-sounding and most flexible cinema processor on the market). We are also manufacturing the DC20 D-Cinema server, and licensing use of our Digital Booking System, and have other products and services in the works.

Hopefully that explains a bit about where we're coming from.

 |  IP: Logged

Tony Bandiera Jr
Film God

Posts: 3067
From: Moreland Idaho
Registered: Apr 2004


 - posted 04-19-2011 03:10 PM      Profile for Tony Bandiera Jr   Email Tony Bandiera Jr   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Daniel, thank you for joining this discussion. Your post explains the internal reasons for the name change, but it still won't mean squat to the consumers and theatre owners (maybe some in the UK who are familiar with Datasat, but here in the US...plonko) and it generates the confusion Bobby and everyone else alluded to.

Why can't Datasat get smart and retain the DTS company name and logo, with the subscript "A Datasat Communications UK division" or something similar.

It would allow the brand identity of DTS to be recognized while acknowledging the new ownership. (Think of RCA and Thompson for example, they did it right.)

And since d-cinema is STILL not being handled by satellite transmission, even the new logo is grossly inaccurate and irrelevant.

Datasat's executives and marketing folks failed BIG TIME with this one, but they can still correct it if they do it soon.

And they can start by revising this new snipe with the DTS name..should be easy since it's all CGI.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 04-19-2011 04:20 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I knew Datasat was originally British (like BP) but I don't think they have much experience with marketing, especially in the cinema. Nobody is claiming that Datasat's products are inferior or the staff less capable compared to when it was called DTS, but Datasat really should have thought the naming of their new cinema line through and struck some sort of deal. Like Bobby mentioned, it would have been in DTS,inc's best interest as well.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 04-19-2011 06:07 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
So, Digital Theater Systems (DTS) does not actually make any products for theatres (or theaters)? It seems that they have name-related issues, too. [Razz]

 |  IP: Logged

Daniel Schulz
Master Film Handler

Posts: 387
From: Los Angeles, CA USA
Registered: Sep 2003


 - posted 04-19-2011 06:40 PM      Profile for Daniel Schulz   Author's Homepage   Email Daniel Schulz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Scott - that's right, DTS no longer manufactures any products for motion picture exhibition. The cinema hardware and technology business was sold in its entirety to Datasat. They did formally change their name from Digital Theatre Systems, Inc. to plain DTS, Inc. quite some time ago (even before they sold the cinema business). Sort of like DVD used to mean Digital Video Disc, then Digital Versatile Disc, then, well nothing at all, just DVD.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.