my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » What is DataStat Digital Sound? (Page 2)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Author Topic: What is DataStat Digital Sound? Ken Lackner Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1907 From: Atlanta, GA, USA Registered: Sep 2001 posted 10-18-2011 09:21 AM                     Funny how the mind plays tricks on you. I've always known it was Datasat and my mind completely ignored the second T and read it as Datasat in the title and every post above Jock's.  |  IP: Logged Bobby Henderson "Ask me about Trajan." Posts: 10973 From: Lawton, OK, USA Registered: Apr 2001 posted 10-18-2011 12:16 PM                     Yeah, I think it's pretty crazy for "Datasat" not to have some arrangement in carrying on the DTS brand name. While the Datasat brand name has started to appear on movie posters, movie trailers and end credits I think the brand name will be visible there only temporarily. The lossy compressed theatrical digital audio formats are made specifically for 35mm prints. With film prints on their way out and seemingly generic uncompressed Linear PCM becoming emerging as the main audio standard via digital cinema it's only a matter of time before the Dolby Digital, DTS and SDDS logos are dropped from movie marketing materials. Movie distributors sure have not been advertising the digital cinema systems in movie marketing. Just digital 3D (and only RealD and IMAX 3D at that). Companies other than Dolby who make D-cinema servers have virtually no chance of becoming a household name since there is no consumer electronics tie-in to it. In the end the Datasat brand name may only be a curious footnote in terms of visibility to average movie-goers.  |  IP: Logged Mike Blakesley Film God Posts: 12767 From: Forsyth, Montana Registered: Jun 99 posted 10-18-2011 01:43 PM                        quote: Bobby Henderson Movie distributors sure have not been advertising the digital cinema systems in movie marketing. Well that would be almost impossible, given all the different brand names and equipment combinations available. Plus they use the same materials to advertise locations where film is being shown.  |  IP: Logged Louis Bornwasser Film God Posts: 4441 From: prospect ky usa Registered: Mar 2005 posted 10-18-2011 02:41 PM                        Bobby: I think the only reason they are there now is legal. Credit is a portion of the contract that involves payment. Louis  |  IP: Logged Scott Jentsch Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1061 From: New Berlin, WI, USA Registered: Apr 2003 posted 10-19-2011 09:07 AM                        quote: Joe Redifer Don't worry, Datastat chose the worst possible name for their company, one that is instantly forgettable. Serves 'em right for choosing such a dumb name. I wonder who was the guy who made the final decision on that name. I don't know who it is, but that guy must have gotten a job over at Netflix this summer... <cough>Qwikster</cough>  |  IP: Logged Frank Angel Film God Posts: 5305 From: Brooklyn NY USA Registered: Dec 1999 posted 10-19-2011 11:44 AM                        Scott, these things don't get done by one guy...stuff that you and I do in a matter of a few minutes, in the corporate world, it takes a gaggle of suits all shooting two dozen emails back and forth in "phase one" of getting something done. Then a slew of back and forth calendar meeting emails set a date for a conference for phase two -- the "proposal phase," then a few hours all sitting around in a conference room "batting ideas off each other," each trying to look smarter than the other for phase three, then, when they finally all agree and spend an hour pat each other on the back wondering if they scored the most points to position themselves for the next move up the ladder, they will then have to hire an independent "focus group" because not a single one of them has the cahones to risk doing anything that might fail (gasp!) and they will always need to blame it on someone other than themselves, so it will be that bunch of real people the focus group paid to sit in a room giving their opinion on the "brilliant idea" the suits came up with. If it fails, they can say it must not have been a good "demographic slice" they got in the focus group. Yah, that's it, it was those stupid people off the street...what do THEY know. Evidently in the case of Netflix, one of the suits in Budget and Finance thought it would be cost effective to skip the focus group and take a bold move and go with Creative Dept.'s "brilliant idea." And that, boys and girls, is the story behind Netflix landing a 23% price increase on loyal customers without so much as a howdydo and an ASSinine name launch like Qwix-effin-ster. You can bet that when this thing crashed and burned as nastily as it did, there was a lot of rats running from the sinking ship and you could hear lot of it-wasn't-my-idea"s in the hallways.  |  IP: Logged Bobby Henderson "Ask me about Trajan." Posts: 10973 From: Lawton, OK, USA Registered: Apr 2001 posted 10-19-2011 12:38 PM                     Frank, you forgot about all the people the execs use to create lots of PowerPoint presentations on each version of the "brilliant idea" along with enough printed material to eradicate a small rain forest. As for the Netflix price increase: I think that one goes to the movie studios and them wanting an ever increasing amount of money from the Netflix pie. It's about taking care of share holders. And the only thing share holders want is that stock price gaining lots of value quarter after quarter after quarter. And the only relatively simple way to manage that: price gouge that stupid fucking customer. And that's because the customers can go fuck themselves.  |  IP: Logged Joshua Waaland Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 800 From: Cleveland, Ohio Registered: Dec 1999 posted 10-19-2011 03:59 PM                     My old boss used to quote a commercial that he saw once that showed a stuffy boardroom and a bunch of old guys sitting around saying "we're going to give them, what we want to give them, when we want to give it to them".  |  IP: Logged Andy Frodsham Expert Film Handler Posts: 238 From: Stoke on Trent, Staffs, UK Registered: Nov 2006 posted 10-19-2011 04:23 PM                     I assume the new, truly awful, over-long, slow Datasat trailer is a product of corporate mentality - essentially inappropriate and compatible with nothing! Outer space, flying saucers and more than a passing reference to ET; I'd love to see how anyone could stick that onto the head of, say, 'Jane Eyre'!  |  IP: Logged Mike Blakesley Film God Posts: 12767 From: Forsyth, Montana Registered: Jun 99 posted 10-19-2011 06:41 PM                        quote: Bobby Henderson As for the Netflix price increase: I think that one goes to the movie studios and them wanting an ever increasing amount of money from the Netflix pie. Well you can hardly blame them for that. They get over half of the money from the theatres, then two months later they turn their product over to an outfit that'll let a dozen or more people watch their movie for a buck.  |  IP: Logged Bobby Henderson "Ask me about Trajan." Posts: 10973 From: Lawton, OK, USA Registered: Apr 2001 posted 10-19-2011 11:06 PM                     Yeah, and those movie distributors are the same idiots who agreed to the arrangement in the first place. I'm more appalled at their stupidity of letting RedBox decimate much of the brick and mortar video rental business. But then those same geniuses came up with rental specific Blu-ray and DVDs that are more aggravating to watch than old VHS tapes. Forced trailers and commercials, no extras, no chapter stops, etc. At least with a VHS tape you could cue the movie to the beginning. You can't even do that with one of those damned rental discs. They suck! Consequently my video rental habits have dropped off to next to nothing. Brilliant move Hollywood at pissing off a formerly loyal customer!  |  IP: Logged Scott Jentsch Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1061 From: New Berlin, WI, USA Registered: Apr 2003 posted 10-20-2011 09:05 AM                        When the split happened between the commercial group and the consumer technology group, I can imagine there being a tug of war negotiation in the conference room about who could keep the DTS branding. The brand recognition of DTS is much more important on the consumer sector than in the commercial sector, so either that group got a sweet deal or they paid dearly to keep the brand on their team. In a few short years, the DTS technology would seem to be irrelevant in the commercial sector, as the conversion to digital cinema brings with it the brandless PCM lossless multichannel sound. While Datasat may or may not make equipment for the behind the scenes work, its presence in front of consumers is fleeting at best. In contrast, DTS in the home has flourished in the past couple of years, and I would say that it has eclipsed Dolby TrueHD as the dominant sound format on Blu-ray discs. Not bad for a brand that was on the ropes in the consumer market not too long ago... But still, Datasat Digital was the best the commercial team could come up with? It sounds like a satellite communications company. There really needs to be a version of WikiLeaks for company employees to post how such decisions got made, that would make for some interesting reading.  |  IP: Logged Jock Blakley Expert Film Handler Posts: 218 From: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Registered: Oct 2011 posted 10-20-2011 09:52 AM                     Wasn't being a satellite communications company Datasat's main purpose before it got involved with digital sound?  |  IP: Logged Frank Angel Film God Posts: 5305 From: Brooklyn NY USA Registered: Dec 1999 posted 10-22-2011 12:31 PM                        quote: Scott Jentsch There really needs to be a version of WikiLeaks for company employees to post how such decisions got made, that would make for some interesting reading. And so the old adage rings true: Really bad decisions make really great stories!  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.