Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Thoughts on the JBL 3678. (Page 3)

 
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
Author Topic: Thoughts on the JBL 3678.
Marco Giustini
Film God

Posts: 2713
From: Reading, UK
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 07-19-2015 02:36 PM      Profile for Marco Giustini   Email Marco Giustini   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I firmly believe a speaker should be tested and that we should have the data.
Ok, the anechoic chamber may not be a real world test but I feel a professional manufacturer should test their speakers in the anechoic chamber and provide the data to their customers. After all, the anechoic chamber gives you some invaluable data and I don't see how a professionally designed speaker could be as such without that test.

Anyway, QSC said that the speaker is +/-2dB till 19K in an anechoic chamber. So, according to QSC, that speaker was tested in there. Then the datasheet says 19K -10dB. It seems that one of the statements is wrong here.

I am very sceptical of manufacturers that don't put attention on the datasheets. I choose my speakers based on them. A mistake on the datasheet is like a grammar mistake on a CV, it immediately spoils the general idea of the candidate.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 07-19-2015 05:47 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Marco,

You should call John Meyer and talk with him. He gave a talk at one of the Dolby Training classes I went to back in the early 1980's that lasted over three hours. He was talking so far over everyone's head (physics) that it was almost unbelievable. He did talk at length about testing speakers outdoors vs. in a chamber and I know at that time he completely abandoned chambers. I think his products also speak for themselves... at least for those that can afford them.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Marco Giustini
Film God

Posts: 2713
From: Reading, UK
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 07-20-2015 03:33 AM      Profile for Marco Giustini   Email Marco Giustini   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
What I am saying is that I am expecting some kind of test results from a manufacturer and not just a listening test or inconsistent data.

I am happy to discuss the anechoic chamber topic but I am not ready to accept a datasheet that says "it just sounds great".
That is ok in the Hi-Fi world.

 |  IP: Logged

Gerald Dente
Film Handler

Posts: 14
From: southborough MA usa
Registered: Jun 2015


 - posted 07-20-2015 11:32 AM      Profile for Gerald Dente   Email Gerald Dente   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
We can assume they measured the speaker when they built it and that data should exist some place right? Or do people just throw together parts in a box, package it up and sell it without any testing? No, I think not.

All I would like is some of the data they had when testing out the speaker. Help me determine GENERALLY how it will sound and how it will be off axis. That's not asking for to much and a company like QSC I would expect a bit more in that regard.

 |  IP: Logged

Marco Giustini
Film God

Posts: 2713
From: Reading, UK
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 07-20-2015 12:12 PM      Profile for Marco Giustini   Email Marco Giustini   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I second that.

 |  IP: Logged

Avi Bm
Film Handler

Posts: 5
From: WELLING, KENT, UK
Registered: Mar 2015


 - posted 07-20-2015 02:23 PM      Profile for Avi Bm   Author's Homepage   Email Avi Bm   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have the 3 qsc sc 1120 in a 2500 cubic ft room.
The are incredible. Vocals dynamic flat accurate. I also have 2 SB 1180 but it does seem an over kill. At least in my room. At the moment 1 sub sounds better than two. The qsc were good with or without a baffle wall.

2 jbl 8320 at the back adding more channels.
Wonder whether anyone can recommend qsc atmos ceiling spkrs(mounted) for a small room.

 |  IP: Logged

Gerald Dente
Film Handler

Posts: 14
From: southborough MA usa
Registered: Jun 2015


 - posted 07-20-2015 03:07 PM      Profile for Gerald Dente   Email Gerald Dente   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
You by chance havent taken any measurements of your speakers have you?

 |  IP: Logged

PoiNguan Goh
Film Handler

Posts: 1
From: Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia
Registered: Nov 2015


 - posted 11-27-2015 07:26 PM      Profile for PoiNguan Goh     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
@ Avi Bm
DO you have any measurement for the QSC SC 1120?

Anyone else in here have the 1150?

 |  IP: Logged

System Notices
Forum Watchdog / Soup Nazi

Posts: 215

Registered: Apr 2004


 - posted 08-02-2017 04:03 AM      Profile for System Notices         Edit/Delete Post 

It has been 613 days since the last post.


 |  IP: Logged

Hans Van Meenen
Film Handler

Posts: 7
From: Gent / Oost Vlaanderen, Belgium
Registered: Jul 2017


 - posted 08-02-2017 04:03 AM      Profile for Hans Van Meenen   Email Hans Van Meenen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I ordered the QSC sc-1150 today. Hope I won't regret replacing my old but relative high end speakers. I just needed more dynamics and integration.

Anybody else who has them?
I will keep this post updated with my experience

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-02-2017 02:25 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've installed lots of them in small cinemas. They are excellent sounding.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Jarod Reddig
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 513
From: Hays, Ks
Registered: Jun 2011


 - posted 08-03-2017 12:14 AM      Profile for Jarod Reddig   Email Jarod Reddig   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Congrats Hans! Looking forward to your opinion.

 |  IP: Logged

Hans Van Meenen
Film Handler

Posts: 7
From: Gent / Oost Vlaanderen, Belgium
Registered: Jul 2017


 - posted 08-03-2017 05:16 AM      Profile for Hans Van Meenen   Email Hans Van Meenen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
yeah, very excited [Smile]
It's thanks to this forum that I went to QSC, I was looking for the JBL 3677 first.
I hope this small horn will be up to its task.
I was a bit sceptical at first because compared to consumer hifi, these QSC's are really not expensive.

One thing I was wondering: did anybody try the better PA models like KW153, or would that be a stupid idea?

Thanks a lot

 |  IP: Logged

David Buckley
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 525
From: Oxford, N. Canterbury, New Zealand
Registered: Aug 2004


 - posted 08-03-2017 04:23 PM      Profile for David Buckley   Author's Homepage   Email David Buckley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Hans Van Meenen
did anybody try the better PA models like KW153
Although QSC right now are right in the sweet spot for cinema, with the right combination of quality and price, the KW153 is not a "better PA model", most folks in live audio would rate that speaker as average amongst its peers. I'd certainly not recommend it over a QSC cinema speaker for cinema use.

 |  IP: Logged

Jarod Reddig
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 513
From: Hays, Ks
Registered: Jun 2011


 - posted 08-03-2017 08:46 PM      Profile for Jarod Reddig   Email Jarod Reddig   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I got a great deal on a trio of 3677s so I went with them for my home theater behind a 10 ft screen. I love them and have no regrets.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.