|
|
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1 2 3 4 5
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Arclight LA Star Wars Disaster
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 12-19-2015 10:53 PM
quote: Randy Stankey In a traditional movie theater, you can swap out a platter motor, replace parts or run a show manually, even if that means spinning a reel by hand. In a digital cinema, if a hard drive fails or if a computer crashes, it is likely that there will be no way to save a show.
That's why servers use a RAID (usually RAID5) for storage, have two power supply units, more fans than the unit needs to maintain its required operating temperature, etc. Someone who has only been trained in the basic operation of the software front end would not be able to repair the sort of faults that a DCP server occasionally throws at you, but there again, a film projectionist who was only able to thread and play wouldn't have been able to fix minor faults on one of those installations, either.
The DCI requirements for digital cinema systems specified that they had to match their 35mm predecessors for overall reliability. I'm guessing that the big theater chains don't publish statistics as to how many booth equipment failures causing the loss of a show they've had (with all other relevant factors, e.g. the maintenance regime in use, being equal), but I suspect that if DCI/DCP projection systems weren't achieving that reliability level, lawsuits would be flying and 35mm would be making a mainstream comeback.
We've already seen a demonstration of market forces at work over reliability with the Attack on Titan subtitle disaster. Many distributors abandoned VFs as a result, and are only producing DCPs with burnt-in subtitles. Even though it means more data to wrangle and consequently higher distribution costs, the VF aspect of the DCP is now considered an unreliable software infrastructure, and given the availability of a less sophisticated workaround that improves reliability for only slightly greater cost, the industry is voting with its feet.
IMHO the real vulnerability of digital cinema is encryption and KDMs. That has nothing to do with the technology per se, and everything to do with the humans using it. I've never lost a show completely due to server or projector failure, but I have because a distributor failed to supply a correct KDM.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Jack Ondracek
Film God

Posts: 2348
From: Port Orchard, WA, USA
Registered: Oct 2002
|
posted 12-19-2015 11:53 PM
I find it sad that when this kind of thing happens, the pro-film side jumps down the throat of all-things-digital... gleefully reporting on a singular failure. OK. A show had a problem. Surely, back when everything was all film, somewhere a gear failed, a diode popped, a switching power supply decided to die, a starter switch in a projector motor started its last. Those failure points would all be unusual, and not something most experienced projectionists could, or maybe even would attempt to fix quickly enough to save a show. Yet life would go on, most of us would never know of the failure in a film-based playout system and the legend of the medium's invincibility would remain intact. It's just not reasonable to believe that an installed base of 30,000+ mechanical systems could get through the day without a hiccup.
I'd bet it would be generous to suggest only a small handful of projectionists never had a serious problem in their day... and I'd also bet even Brad himself had an oh-shit or two in his time.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tyler Purcell
Expert Film Handler
Posts: 180
From: Van Nuys, CA
Registered: Dec 2015
|
posted 12-20-2015 12:47 PM
I'll just mention something that may or may not stir the pot. I've been forced to watch digital projection here in Los Angeles, the hub of the film industry for what, the last 5 years? Anyway, I use to go to the theaters all the time when it was film, but with digital I don't because the consistency of the projectors is all over the place. I've seen 3 movies in the last 2 weeks, all of them had projector issues. One had a lamp going out, so the image wavered the whole time. One had white diagonal lines on the left part of the image. The other was the red channel bleeding onto the blue and green. So three movies and three bad projectors.
This isn't an "extreme" case either. I'd say 90% of the time I view a movie in digital, there is a problem of some sort unrelated to the image coming off the server. Heck, last time I went to the AMC in Burbank, the upper right portion of the screen was out of focus and had lost all contrast. Must have been a bad lens or something. Still, nobody bothered to change the projector, nobody complained or cared. I sure as heck complained because if I'm going to waste $16 bux at seeing television at a movie theater, it should look A LOT BETTER then my personal home theater. I refuse to go to AMC anymore, I just won't waste my money.
It's funny that every time I see film (35/70) projected here in LA, it's stellar. Mind you, I don't go to shit theaters, I really only go to Arclight because their film projectors are in good shape and their projectionists care. I use to go 30 times a year prior to the shift to digital and never once... not a single bloody time, did I have a problem with the film projection. Now, I really can't stand going to the cinema, I just wait for video. Which is really sad because I'm a true cinephile, but I can't stand incompetent projection.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Manny Montes
Master Film Handler

Posts: 270
From: United States
Registered: Feb 2010
|
posted 12-20-2015 01:07 PM
I've had the exact opposite experience and I'm pretty sure for the industry as a whole, it has seen the same as I have.
With 35mm I had plenty of screenings ruined, brainwraps, gate weave, scratches, starting out of frame (yes that is a real complaint), etc.
with digital I have found that the playing field has "leveled" so to speak, now the real differentiation is sound. It has turned the discount house into a decent place to watch movies since I won't have all the dirt and scratches that it used to have with an old 35mm print, it will play perfectly each time. For that I appreciate it, and to be honest as a projectionist seeing cue marks really took me out of the film and put me into "work mode" it was cool when I first started but got old quickly.
I don't think digital is even close to perfect yet, but it is definitely a step up in reliability day to day.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Paul H. Rayton
Expert Film Handler
Posts: 210
From: Los Angeles, CA , USA
Registered: Aug 2003
|
posted 12-20-2015 02:41 PM
I heard that there are, nationwide, a total of 4134 "screens" showing SW:TFA. I presume that is a count of all types of screens, including the Imaxes. Just for fun, let's do a bit of speculation -- let's conjecture that each of those locations are running the show 4X per day (and I'm sure some are higher). But at 4X per day, that is 16,536 presentations of the movie every day. And we've only heard about one or two "problems" so far (strangely, both reported at local Arclights!)? That gives us -- if those are the only two -- a resultant "bad" rate of 0.0001209. I'm sure the actuaries and accountants can live with that.
I'm supposing that there may have been glitches elsewhere, but here in L.A. people are hypercritical (and hyper ready-to-post-images!). But a few glitches here and there are not going to stop this Juggernaut!
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1 2 3 4 5
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|