Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » 70MM STAR WARS ROGUE ONE (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: 70MM STAR WARS ROGUE ONE
Tyler Purcell
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 180
From: Van Nuys, CA
Registered: Dec 2015


 - posted 10-19-2016 05:07 PM      Profile for Tyler Purcell   Author's Homepage   Email Tyler Purcell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Soon it will be; "ohh the projector is out of calibration, whatever nobody will notice".

Wait... that happens already.

See, the nice thing about film is that, if you do a bad job people know and complain. With digital, you don't have to do anything, people just accept it because there is no alternative. That's been my biggest beef with this whole film v digital debate. I'm a filmmaker and I have no choice but to present my movies digitally.

 |  IP: Logged

Martin Brooks
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 900
From: Forest Hills, NY, USA
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 10-22-2016 12:43 AM      Profile for Martin Brooks   Author's Homepage   Email Martin Brooks   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Tyler Purcell
See, the nice thing about film is that, if you do a bad job people know and complain.
I have to disagree with that. In an age where people complain about every trivial thing, you'd think they'd complain about bad presentation, whether film or digital, but generally they just accept that that's the way it is and they don't complain. The only exceptions in my experience were when a lamp blew completely or the projector stopped due to a film break. I once saw a film where it was obvious that the reels were in the wrong order and I was the only one who complained.

I can't tell you the number of times I complained about presentations back in the film days and I was almost always told, "you're the only one who complained". While that might be a lie in some cases, it's not a lie in all cases because I would sit there and be enraged and storm out of the auditorium to find someone and everyone else was just sitting there.

As I've written a number of times before, I saw "The Master" in 70mm at the (late) Ziegfeld in NYC and the print had dirt end-to-end. I was the only one complaining. Decades ago, I saw the movie "Fillmore" at the Loews Kings in Brooklyn in 4-tk mag and one audio channel was completely missing. The manager of that theater did nothing and just said the usual, "that's the way it's supposed to be". I wrote to Loews and they admitted there was a problem and send me a check for one ticket. When I saw E.T. in 70mm at Movieland in NYC, there was a 60 Hz hum throughout the whole film. When I complained about that, one of the guys sitting around said, "he heard the hum" as if no one else ever did.

Bad presentation is bad presentation and it has nothing to do with whether it's film or digital. But at least with digital, idiots in the theater can't destroy the print and even in the smallest towns, people are seeing an image without dirt, scratches, weave, bad shutter sync, frames missing, wow and flutter in the audio, and they get to see the movies the same day that people get to see them in Los Angeles and New York. That wasn't the case in the film days when more often that not, except for first run theaters early in the run, you felt like you were watching films in a grind house.

On the other hand, I've also seen digital presented out-of-focus, with the center channel fed to the left speaker and especially with Sony 3D projectors, whether projecting 2D or 3D, absurdly dim images with bad color. I've also been in theaters where the sound was completely distorted and not just because the level was cranked up too high.

Etc.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 10-22-2016 07:39 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Martin Brooks
I have to disagree with that. In an age where people complain about every trivial thing, you'd think they'd complain about bad presentation, whether film or digital, but generally they just accept that that's the way it is and they don't complain.
Very few people bother to complain about presentation problems because it's far too much of a pain in the ass to do so, especially now. 20 or 30 years ago it was easier to complain. Multiplex sites weren't so big and stadium seating hadn't yet taken over theater designs.

Today if something goes wrong during a show the audience plays a waiting game, seeing who will get up first to go complain, trying to wait out each other. Sometimes no one leaves their seat. It means missing a good sized chunk of the movie.

I swear, it seems like whenever anything goes wrong I'm the one who gets to miss part of the movie to complain. I gotta leave the middle seat, stepping over other people to get to the aisle. Then I have to walk down all those stadium riser steps toward the screen and then once I hit ground level I have to walk another auditorium length to the room's entrance. Then comes the fun of walking down long hallways into the lobby and trying to find anyone there who might get in touch with a manager promptly. Like I said, it's a real pain in the ass.

 |  IP: Logged

Tyler Purcell
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 180
From: Van Nuys, CA
Registered: Dec 2015


 - posted 10-23-2016 03:41 PM      Profile for Tyler Purcell   Author's Homepage   Email Tyler Purcell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Honestly, I can't go to regular cinemas anymore, they all look like crap to me. If I go to the cinema, which is very rare these days thanks to the crap content, I go to the best theater in town and deal with the drive/ticket expense, because they deliver the highest quality show. If they don't play the movie I want to see, then I'll just wait for the digital release and watch it on my calibrated high definition DLP projected, home theater. Since movies today are mostly shot digital and the vast majority are finished in 2k, why bother seeing it on a big screen with all the aliasing and pixilation. At least when things go bad at MY home theater, I can solve them immediately and re-start the presentation. [Smile]

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 10-23-2016 04:48 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Aliasing and pixelation? These days most theaters I visit have such slightly out of focus imagery viewers can't tell if they're watching a movie in 2K or 4K. The picture may be rock steady and acceptably bright, but I often see more tack sharp detail from a Blu-ray at home on my 65" TV set.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark J. Marshall
Film God

Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 11-14-2016 10:26 AM      Profile for Mark J. Marshall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
So.... No, I guess?

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 11-14-2016 01:57 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Nope. No 70mm. Just digital only.

We'll be lucky if the movie has a 4K DCP, despite the original footage being 6.5K 2.76:1 material. The studios just gotta have their IMAX 3D and Real D stuff -which almost guarantees a 2K DCP.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Schulz
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 122
From: Los Angeles, CA
Registered: May 2007


 - posted 11-14-2016 03:34 PM      Profile for Mike Schulz   Email Mike Schulz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Bobby Henderson
We'll be lucky if the movie has a 4K DCP, despite the original footage being 6.5K 2.76:1 material. The studios just gotta have their IMAX 3D and Real D stuff -which almost guarantees a 2K DCP.
I have a feeling you are going to be right about this. Lucasfilm/Disney decided to release "The Force Awakens" only in 2K despite being shot entirely on film *and* being mastered in Dolby Vision. Through my asking around on why they didn't release any version in 4K, I was told it had to do mainly with the visual effects being created in 2K which would require upscaling, and also the 3D release had to be 2K so to save time/money and to keep it uniform, they decided to just release every version at 2K.

I'm still keeping my fingers crossed and hoping that "Rogue One" will be released in 4K but so far I haven't heard anything about that yet.

 |  IP: Logged

Connor Wilson
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 190
From: Sterling, VA, USA
Registered: Jan 2011


 - posted 11-14-2016 08:25 PM      Profile for Connor Wilson   Email Connor Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think I saw the 4K Rouge One trailer at the new Alamo Drafthouse in Downtown Brooklyn during their test run. The room a huge common height screen nearing the ceiling, floor, and walls, and a surprisingly bright Sony 4K projector.

I wasn't impressed. It was too soft, but that was the aesthetic Lucasfilm wanted as it takes place in between III and IV, but it's closer to IV.

I don't know if it's a compliment, or an insult, depending on how you are looking at it, but it looked a bit like the recent Silver Screen Edition of IV Team Negative 1 cooked up from original 35mm prints.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark J. Marshall
Film God

Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 11-14-2016 09:24 PM      Profile for Mark J. Marshall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mike Schulz
Through my asking around on why they didn't release any version in 4K, I was told it had to do mainly with the visual effects being created in 2K which would require upscaling, and also the 3D release had to be 2K so to save time/money and to keep it uniform, they decided to just release every version at 2K.
If that's true that just fucking pisses me off. It's fucking Star Wars for fuck's sake! The highest grossing movie and they couldn't be bothered with spending a little more to make it look as good as possible?

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 11-15-2016 12:23 AM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Global media bean counters are running the show now. Any freaking thing that eats into the bottom line and "value for shareholders" is expendable, even if it affects how good and long lasting the actual product looks. These bean counters couldn't give a damn about what they're selling if they tried. It's all about the money. They might as well be selling the "widgets" they talk about in business classes.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 11-15-2016 02:31 AM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Tyler Purcell
Theaters have to buy that equipment, so I understand their desire to charge more.
Believe me, there is absolutely no "desire" to charge more. It's called a "necessity" and is only done to keep the doors open. I lose sleep every time I need to raise prices.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 11-15-2016 01:48 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Buck Wilson
Or, in the case of our "Regal", the masking broke(needs recabled) and they won't pay to fix it... "Just leave it open"
Lots and lots of broken masking issues stem from using cheap parts like garage door pulleys and springs. Even garage door openers have been converted to masking duty and most of these openers have cheap plastic gears in the. It costs way more money to use rated stage components from companies like JR Clancy and Stagecraft... often a similar size pulley is 10X or more what a garage door pulley costs at home depot, but they are never going to break nor will they cause your cabling to wear and fray! You can either chose to do it right or pay the price and always have break downs. Sadly the chains always go the cheapest route.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Buck Wilson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 894
From: St. Joseph MO, USA
Registered: Sep 2010


 - posted 11-15-2016 04:31 PM      Profile for Buck Wilson   Email Buck Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
That's hilarious you'd say that. All our systems are, indeed, garage door opener based.

And the cable did fray to the point of near failure, because it kept slipping off the pulley.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 11-16-2016 03:34 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm not surprised. Its not always the opener thats to blame, its usually the cheapo pulleys used that causes the cable to fray. The cable should last almost for ever if its running on proper pulleys and is not over tensioned. If cabling has to be too tight for things to work then the design is completely wrong.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.