Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » BLADE RUNNER 2049 70MM? (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: BLADE RUNNER 2049 70MM?
Lyle Romer
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1400
From: Davie, FL, USA
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 09-18-2017 09:39 AM      Profile for Lyle Romer   Email Lyle Romer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I can't imagine it would be all that difficult to write the software and throw together interface hardware to sync a D-cinema server playback with a DTS timecode track.

The ancient DTS software displayed the reel and frame number if you put a monitor on the DTS-6 processor. I'd be shocked if Dolby didn't have engineers that could do this in a week or 2. Hell, I bet Brad and the Film-Tech team could design something pretty quickly.

I think the bigger issue is Dolby working with the current owners of DTS's technology. Even thought the patents have to be expired, I don't see Dolby (or anybody else) investing to design timecode printers and readers.

I guess the question is how many auditoriums can play back 70mm AND are Atmos equipped? If it is only a handful worldwide then the investment of even a few weeks of man hours isn't worth it.

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 09-18-2017 10:22 AM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
LTC is provided for in a DCP so the better way is to equip the projector with a steeper motor and have it chase the DCP for sync

 |  IP: Logged

Lyle Romer
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1400
From: Davie, FL, USA
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 09-18-2017 12:33 PM      Profile for Lyle Romer   Email Lyle Romer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Gordon McLeod
LTC is provided for in a DCP so the better way is to equip the projector with a steeper motor and have it chase the DCP for sync
Except that won't account for any missing frames if the film gets damaged and spliced. It would also require that ID frames are not chopped off when assembling prints.

 |  IP: Logged

Daniel Schulz
Master Film Handler

Posts: 387
From: Los Angeles, CA USA
Registered: Sep 2003


 - posted 09-18-2017 09:50 PM      Profile for Daniel Schulz   Author's Homepage   Email Daniel Schulz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
A cheap and easy solution would be to do something like Auro-3D or the IMAX 12 channel system. The XD10/XD20 units support 8 channels; two together could play back up to 16 channels, more than enough to cover the 11.1 channel layout of Auro-3D or the 12 channel layout of IMAX.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 09-18-2017 11:19 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Lyle Romer
I guess the question is how many auditoriums can play back 70mm AND are Atmos equipped?
Obviously there's not very many, but some theaters do have both. I know of one such screen at LOOK Cinemas in Dallas.

 |  IP: Logged

Manny Knowles
"What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???"

Posts: 4247
From: Bloomington, IN, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 09-19-2017 12:23 AM      Profile for Manny Knowles   Email Manny Knowles   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Bobby Henderson
The 70mm film productions are something meant to please the minority of us who appreciate the difference in image quality.
I'd argue that 70mm releases are meant to satisfy the demands of a handful of directors who are insistent upon it. I doubt the studios are doing this for us.

Does anyone know if...
...the 70mm screens are outperforming the digital counterparts?
...the studios are making a profit off the 70mm locations?

Marrying 70mm with DCP soundtracks might make for a very popular format -- and I don't think the studios (or theaters) want a reason to go back to film. Do you?

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 09-19-2017 10:15 AM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
To my knowledge of the current servers they can not be made to chase time code
Where as a projector can be made to do so
with competent projectionist there should be no lost frames
If there were then a black filler just like Imax has to do

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 09-19-2017 12:24 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Manny Knowles
Marrying 70mm with DCP soundtracks might make for a very popular format -- and I don't think the studios (or theaters) want a reason to go back to film. Do you?
Not really. The movie studio bosses and especially their media company bosses and investors, want film gone as soon as possible as a means of saving money. They have tunnel vision in regard to this. I don't think they know or care how important it is to get customers to see their movies in movie theaters, especially with what is now going on in the home video market.

The big problem with lower cost, faster to crank out, all-digital movie product: it looks and feels no different than the product I can see at home on the HDTV set. I don't feel like I'm missing anything at all by watching that kind of product at home. And since the movies go from theatrical release to the home viewing platforms in only 2-3 months time it's very easy to wait, especially when a couple can blow upwards of $50 or more for a visit to the theater.

For the movie studios it may not make any difference to them whether the customer watches the movie at home or in the theater. Unfortunately for those studios by the time the new movie shows up on home viewing platforms it is VERY EASY for the new movie to get lost there.

Both movie theaters and brick and mortar video stores provided a good marketing space for movie companies to push their new products. Theaters show movie trailers, display huge posters, banners and standees. Video stores were able to do some of the same things on a more limited basis. Now the video stores are mostly gone. I don't think movie marketing on the Internet or in some app is very effective.

Movie streaming is popular, but services like Netflix, Amazon Prime and Hulu put extreme emphasis on TV content (particularly their own). Unless you have a specific movie title in mind it can be really difficult to "re-discover" some recent movie release you didn't see in the theater and forgot all about it. Those streaming services have really been pulling back on the amount of catalog movies they carry. Netflix used to carry a lot of classic movies; now they hardly carry shit for classics. For a lot of those kinds of titles you have to be willing to pay at least $3-$4 for a rental from Amazon or buy a copy on disc (if the disc is even available anymore).

There is a shit ton of recent movie releases I haven't seen and probably will never bother to see. That especially goes for a lot of remakes, reboots, etc. When they were "new" at the theater (and if the reviews were good) there might be some passing curiosity to see it. Months later when that movie becomes available to watch at home it can easily disappear in the mountain of other stuff I haven't watched. I have at least a couple dozen or more TV episodes on my DVR I haven't made time to watch yet. It's turning into work or a chore to fit watching a 2 hour movie into that. I have a bunch of Blu-ray discs gathering dust on a shelf and a bunch of DVDs in storage containers. I rarely buy Blu-ray discs anymore; and I don't buy download versions of movies either. I know I'm not alone with this kind of behavior and growing disregard for buying & renting movies to watch at home.

So, from that perspective, I think it's pretty damned important for movie studios to be doing everything they can to attract customers back to movie theaters. The boom times of selling movies on home video platforms is finished.

 |  IP: Logged

Sean McKinnon
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1712
From: Peabody Massachusetts
Registered: Sep 2000


 - posted 09-19-2017 12:27 PM      Profile for Sean McKinnon   Author's Homepage   Email Sean McKinnon   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
My idea would be to create DTS soundtrack files that output an analog timecode instead of audible audio that a digital cinema server could "chase" and feed the uncompressed audio and object files to the CP850/IMS3000. Will it ever get done on a 100 screen scale? I don't think so. Could it possibly be done as a one off for a premiere or other such special screening? Maybe, if the studio was willing to invest in it and the third parties were willing to work on it.

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 09-20-2017 10:20 PM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Manny Knowles
Does anyone know if...
...the 70mm screens are outperforming the digital counterparts?

As a rough guage our 7Omm shows outsell the equivalent DCP by roughly 5:1

 |  IP: Logged

Buck Wilson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 894
From: St. Joseph MO, USA
Registered: Sep 2010


 - posted 09-21-2017 06:45 PM      Profile for Buck Wilson   Email Buck Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Manny Knowles
Does anyone know if...
...the 70mm screens are outperforming the digital counterparts?

Oh absolutely. The one closest to me, For Dunkirk, the 70mm was sold out or close to it for at least a week, while the DCP was empty or near empty for that same week. The differential between the two was incredible.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 09-21-2017 07:04 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
We've been down this trail before....I'd bet the 70mm is in the biggest/best auditorium, while the DCP is in a plain auditorium, so it's no surprise which one is going to sell the most tickets. I'd bet at least half or more of the people have no clue how the picture is getting to the screen, and only a tiny percentage know what "70mm" means.

I think if you had two identical auditoriums with identical showtimes, and put "70mm film" on one and "Digital" on the other, with no other promotional material, the ticket sales would be almost equal.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 09-21-2017 07:14 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mike Blakesley
I think if you had two identical auditoriums with identical showtimes, and put "70mm film" on one and "Digital" on the other, with no other promotional material, the ticket sales would be almost equal.


Agreed. But the point of the 5/70 and 15/70 releases is that they can be sold as being something special and unique. The 70mm locations for Dunkirk and H8 had special posters advertising that fact. If something is promoted as being special and unique, as opposed to "normal" (i.e. what every other movie looks like), it will potentially attract patrons. It works just like a "Dolby Stereo" logo on a marquee in 1980--even if people didn't know what "Dolby Stereo" was, they knew that it was supposed to be good.

Whether this concept actually sells more tickets in total or just shifts the same number of ticket sales towards the "special" venues is a different question.

Still, if I were an exhibitor or film distributor, I would tend to be in favor of anything that increased my profit, regardless of the format involved.

 |  IP: Logged

Geoff Jones
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 579
From: Broomfield, CO, USA
Registered: Feb 2006


 - posted 09-21-2017 07:17 PM      Profile for Geoff Jones   Author's Homepage   Email Geoff Jones   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mike Blakesley
We've been down this trail before....I'd bet the 70mm is in the biggest/best auditorium, while the DCP is in a plain auditorium, so it's no surprise which one is going to sell the most tickets. I'd bet at least half or more of the people have no clue how the picture is getting to the screen, and only a tiny percentage know what "70mm" means.

I think if you had two identical auditoriums with identical showtimes, and put "70mm film" on one and "Digital" on the other, with no other promotional material, the ticket sales would be almost equal.

This has not been my experience. Both theaters that played The Hateful Eight and Dunkirk in 70MM in Colorado, put them in a smaller auditoriums, unfortunately.

However, because there were so few places projecting 70MM, they both drew large crowds. People were coming in from out of town and even out of state.

 |  IP: Logged

Buck Wilson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 894
From: St. Joseph MO, USA
Registered: Sep 2010


 - posted 09-21-2017 07:55 PM      Profile for Buck Wilson   Email Buck Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mike Blakesley
We've been down this trail before....I'd bet the 70mm is in the biggest/best auditorium, while the DCP is in a plain auditorium, so it's no surprise which one is going to sell the most tickets. I'd bet at least half or more of the people have no clue how the picture is getting to the screen, and only a tiny percentage know what "70mm" means.

I think if you had two identical auditoriums with identical showtimes, and put "70mm film" on one and "Digital" on the other, with no other promotional material, the ticket sales would be almost equal.

I'm going to respectfully disagree with you on this. For this example I was talking about, It was an AMC, so there was pretty much zero advertising. In fact, on the amc website, the 70mm show still had the large "DIGITAL" tagline on it, with a much smaller "70mm film" tag below it. Beyond that, the digital got the Dolby Cinema screen, and the 70mm obviously did not. AND, they had competing show times. Despite all that, When I was looking for tickets days in advance, every single opening weekend showtime for the 70mm was sold out Thursday through Sunday, and there was less than a dozen tickets sold for the digital showings for the ENTIRE weekend. This trend continued for at least two weeks. HEAVY HEAVY sales for the 70mm, while the digital auditorium sat empty or close to it.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.