Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » The Afterlife   » Sony Betamax RIP (Page 3)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Sony Betamax RIP
Paul Mayer
Oh get out of it Melvin, before it pulls you under!

Posts: 3836
From: Albuquerque, NM
Registered: Feb 2000


 - posted 08-31-2002 01:20 PM      Profile for Paul Mayer   Author's Homepage   Email Paul Mayer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In the '80's there was a digital audio tape format that could record 2-track PCM on VHS, Beta, or 3/4" tape. There were standalone PCM recorders (Sony F-1) and PCM encoder/decoders that could use a VCR as a transport. Yes, this format used the helical tracks to get sufficient head writing speed to record 44.1kHz PCM on tape. Didn't know that MFSL actually released titles in this format. This format was used mostly by small studios and independent producers wanting an inexpensive way to get into digital recording or mastering, much like ADAT and S-VHS is used now. The major drawbacks to PCM recording at the time were the 2-track limitation and that editing was very glitchy without some fairly sophisticated (i.e. expensive) signal processing to ensure that the PCM frame pulses were always placed at the beginning of a video frame.

The alternative to PCM was Delta Modulation which could also be recorded on VHS, Beta, or U-Matic tape and was much more forgiving to edit since DM didn't use framing pulses. Editing was as accurate as whatever edit controller one was using. Tascam, Fostex, and Otari made DM machines.

Paul
Back in Orange and Long Beach for the weekend, making sushi...


 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-31-2002 01:45 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Why would anyone replace Betacam SP with DVCAM, which is a substantially inferior format (at least with respect to picture quality)? Heck, Betacam SP was a step down from 1" C-type!

Interestingly, the HDCAM format of which Mr. Lucas is so fond uses the same tape shells as Betacam SP and Digibeta, of which the smaller one is the same as for the consumer Betamax. The running time for an HDCAM tape is different depending on the frame rate (it can be shot at 24p or 60i).

So what format is used to distribute movies to TV stations these days? Is it one of the standard tape formats or something different? Do TV stations even get physical tapes of the movies that they broadcast or is it all on a satellite feed now? Obviously all of this would originate on film, but I can't believe that most TV stations in the US have broadcast anything off a film chain since the early '80s.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 09-01-2002 11:21 AM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Not that long ago I purchased two used machines off eBay to keep access to my old Beta format tapes. I can only imagine what a new one would cost when they were only making so few.


 |  IP: Logged

Thomas Procyk
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1842
From: Royal Palm Beach, FL, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 09-01-2002 11:29 AM      Profile for Thomas Procyk   Email Thomas Procyk   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Paul --

Here's a link to MFSL VHS & Beta Audio Tapes

"...They cost twice as much to make than their retail, so we made them for the hell of it, for the quality connection..." Find a company nowadays that can make that statement.

=TMP=


 |  IP: Logged

Bruce McGee
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1776
From: Asheville, NC USA... Nowhere in Particular.
Registered: Aug 1999


 - posted 09-01-2002 09:04 PM      Profile for Bruce McGee   Email Bruce McGee   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Why did I dislike (hate) the 3M tape?

I bought a case of new T-120 HG tape and did not immediately use it. Actually it sat on the shelf for a year. When I finally opened each tape and made a recording, I found, after playback, that all I had for an image was snow. The oxide was allover the video, and ctl heads. The recording was irreplaceable. My cousins wedding. Too bad. Yes, I bought the tape because all the vid magazines were raving over the stuff.

My dealer didn't want to help me, since it had been a bit over a year since my purchase. 3M offered to replace or refund my money. I took the refund. This was the one time that I was really counting on the product, and it failed miserably. This all happened in 1987.

Perhaps "Hate" is a bit strong. Dislike is more like it.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 09-02-2002 02:02 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
You can come across bad examples or batches of generally good products. If I have a bad experience with something once or twice I tend to forgive it - any more and I'll avoid that product in future. For example, I have now experienced three Seagate hard discs that have suffered outright failure with complete loss of data: once to me in 1997, once on my girlfriend's PC a year later and once at work in 2000. That is three more than I have had fail of any other brand which is enough to be more than a coincidence - it says to me that their quality control is no good. As a result I now actively avoid buying Seagate drives.

It can happen the other way, too - when I got my current car everyone warned me that Fiats are rust-prone and unreliable, yet my 9 year-old Tempra which has done 173,000 miles, has no rust and does 400 miles a week commuting without any complaints.


 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 09-02-2002 02:22 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
VHS-HQ rocks! I would nuke six entire cities if it meant I could have one VCR with VHS-HQ. That HQ really makes all the difference in the world! Thanks Brad for introducing me to the wonderful world of VHS-HQ!

In my opinion VHS as a format has suffered some quality issues over the past 5 or so years it seems. JVC VCRs, which used to be nothing short of outstanding, are now a pile of steaming at their very best. Fortunately Mitsubishi still makes quality VCRs, and they are the only makers of SVHS I will buy.


 |  IP: Logged

Paul G. Thompson
The Weenie Man

Posts: 4718
From: Mount Vernon WA USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 09-02-2002 03:10 AM      Profile for Paul G. Thompson   Email Paul G. Thompson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have had very good luck with this tape.

I have two JVC Hi-Fi HR-S4700U VCR's. They are equipped with flying erase heads and do a beautiful job of editing, right down to the gnat's butt. These machines are close to 11 years old now, and I certainly don't want to stuff any peanut butter-jelly sandwiches in them.

3M Tapes are good, but just like any other brand, you have to get the top-of-the line tape. The rest are .

There was how many different ones...I can't remember. Let's see...EX, HGX Gold, XL-HiFi, RX-Pro, XR-S, SX, XR, EHG, PRO-HiFi, S-XG, S-XZ,
SG, SHG, Poop, More Poop, - where does it stop? Of course, you have the Radio Shack stuff that flys apart and plugs up the heads, and some stuff that just won't run.

My favorites:

JVC S-XZ
JVC S-XG
Fugi Super VHS Pro
Maxell XRS
Maxell RX-Pro120
3M 120SHG (This is not a SVHS Tape, but I like it for general recording.)


 |  IP: Logged

System Notices
Forum Watchdog / Soup Nazi

Posts: 215

Registered: Apr 2004


 - posted 11-11-2015 10:58 AM      Profile for System Notices         Edit/Delete Post 

It has been 4818 days since the last post.


 |  IP: Logged

Paul Mayer
Oh get out of it Melvin, before it pulls you under!

Posts: 3836
From: Albuquerque, NM
Registered: Feb 2000


 - posted 11-11-2015 10:58 AM      Profile for Paul Mayer   Author's Homepage   Email Paul Mayer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The machines went out of production in 2002. I had no idea the tape continued to be manufactured. Now in 2015 the tape stock finally joins the machines... (From RocketNews24)

RIP Sony Betamax!

quote:

Sony to stop selling Betamax video cassette tapes in March

Sony announced on Tuesday that after four decades, it will stop shipping Betamax (or Beta) and MicroMV video cassette tapes next March. The company explained that it is ending sales in these formats in light of the changing marketplace, due to the end of analog television broadcasts in Japan in 2012, the decreased demand, and other factors.

The Betamax video cassette is a format of recordable magnetic tape media that Sony developed for home video use. The company started manufacturing the players and tapes in 1975. Sony had already stopped producing Betamax video cassette tape recorders in 2002. The format eventually sold 18 million recorders, and cassette sales peaked in 1984 with an annual total of about 50 million.

The MicroMV video cassette is a separate format of recordable magnetic tape media for digital video cameras. Sony also stopped producing MicroMV video cameras in 2005.

Cowboy Bebop, a Sunrise science-fiction television anime set in the year 2071, made an obsolete Betamax cassette a pivotal element in its 18th episode, “Speak Like a Child."


 |  IP: Logged

Steve Matz
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 672
From: Billings, Montana, USA
Registered: Sep 2003


 - posted 11-11-2015 11:46 AM      Profile for Steve Matz   Email Steve Matz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Wow; this is an ancient post. I remember buying a Sony Betamax back in the late 70's. Cost almost a 1000 bucks then. Betamax always had a slightly better picture quality simply because the record/playback head was larger than VHS. This made it necessary for the cassettes to be smaller. What's ironic is SONY invented VHS,Their BETA advertising would state "We invented the competition, so they really cut their own throat BETA Sales wise.

As far as tapes losing image after 20 yrs or so, I have the very first VHS Tape I bought right around 78/79 "Abbott and Costello meet Frankenstein" which I paid $50.00 back then. I played it last year just for curiosity and it still looked as good as when I bought it. Places like St. Vincent DePaul, Family Services,Rescue Mission sometimes sell VHS Movies as low as 10 for a Dollar. I have bought a few hundred in the last year and 99% of them still play excellent. You can even find small CRT TV's with integrated VHS Players for under 20 dollars. Disney masterpiece VHS's must still be popular, I've even seen them as high as 5 dollars a piece at the same donation places. I even picked up 2 Tapes of the controversial "Little Mermaid" (original artwork) which at one time I saw people paying as high as 700 bucks. Don't know what their worth now. Can't hardly beat playing a movie for a Dime, so I'll keep buying them. Have also seen NOS SONY,FUJI,TDK,3M, etc., VHS Tapes at these same places for a quarter. I remember new VHS Tapes costing over 20 dollars in the late 70's. I remember when they got to be around 11 dollars, thinking that was a great bargain... [beer]

 |  IP: Logged

Jacob Delaney
Film Handler

Posts: 23
From: Rancho Cucamonga, California, USA
Registered: Dec 2014


 - posted 11-11-2015 11:55 AM      Profile for Jacob Delaney   Email Jacob Delaney   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Are those Betamax tapes really just BetaCAM tapes? I'm pretty sure Betacam(SP) tapes will work in Betamax VCRs, it's just a higher density tape with (I think) same cassettes.

Does this mean Sony will stop making Betacam SP tapes too? I still use those every once in a while.

 |  IP: Logged

Sean Weitzel
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 619
From: Vacaville, CA (1790 miles west of Rockwall)
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 11-11-2015 01:50 PM      Profile for Sean Weitzel   Email Sean Weitzel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
No. Betacam SP tapes are metal formulated vs conventional consumer Betamax tapes which are ferric oxide formulated. Putting a Betacam SP tape in a Betamax player will ruin the heads.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 11-11-2015 02:49 PM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I used used Betacam and Beta SP tapes in a Betamax VCR throughout most of the 1990s without any problem, with the heads or anything else. I strongly suspect, therefore, that the Betamax tapes on sale until around now were actually cassettes containing a broadcast formulation of tape stock, and that the only difference was in the packaging. Sales have presumably declined to the point at which it's no longer viable to produce the separate packaging and absorb the inventory and distribution costs of a separate product line.

 |  IP: Logged

Jacob Delaney
Film Handler

Posts: 23
From: Rancho Cucamonga, California, USA
Registered: Dec 2014


 - posted 11-11-2015 02:50 PM      Profile for Jacob Delaney   Email Jacob Delaney   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
How about standard Betacam? I think those are oxide. I don't know when they stopped making those though.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.