 |
|
Home
Products
Store
Forum
Warehouse
Contact Us
|
|
|
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
|
Author
|
Topic: DVD vs The CINEMA
|
Joe Beres
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 606
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 01-03-2002 10:45 AM
I should have been more specific. Things get most confusing when you are working in different media on the sa,e project. For example, a film I was assisting on was shot on 16mm, and was intended to be released on 16mm. The picture was edited on a flatbed, but the sound was edited digitally on a computer, thus bringing timecode into the picture. The sound was edited to a beta transfer of the edited workprint. I can't remember exactly how it worked, as the different timecodes still confuse me, but I think we had to use 29.97 dropframe timecode so that the sound would sync perfectly with the 24fps print. If the film was shot at 25 fps, and we had the option of using 25fps video, everything would have been much simpler. That is one of the reasons why many producers shooting DV for film prefer to use PAL format production equipment. It simplifies a good deal of post-production logistics.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|
|
|
|