Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » The Afterlife   » Screw HDTV, I want my UHDTV! (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Screw HDTV, I want my UHDTV!
Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Film God

Posts: 3977
From: Midland Ontario Canada (where Panavision & IMAX lenses come from)
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 09-10-2005 11:53 PM      Profile for Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Author's Homepage   Email Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Phil Hill or as Mr. Kodak, from building 69, would say, "Coot"
tell those dedicated Kodak 70mm (oh and 35mm) Film Workers their days are numbered... I'm SURE Kodak has a great early retirement package for them...
There's a lot of them here in the GTA spending their severance cheques on college tuition.

 |  IP: Logged

Brian Michael Weidemann
Expert cat molester

Posts: 944
From: Costa Mesa, CA United States
Registered: Feb 2004


 - posted 09-12-2005 04:39 AM      Profile for Brian Michael Weidemann   Author's Homepage   Email Brian Michael Weidemann   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Joe Redifer
Did I mention that the 15/70 aspect ratio is unacceptable? It needs to be 35/70 or 40/70 to be worthy.
I sure hope I just missed your sarcasm or something! Forty sprocket holes to a frame would require a heck of an intermittent or rolling-loop rotor! [Wink]

Although, now that I think about it ... who's to say you couldn't do full frame 15/70 with anamorphic lenses? That would be pretty sharp! You can HAVE your 2.35:1 after all.

And, by the way, what's this "television" thing y'all are talkin' 'bout?

Speaker channels above, at, AND below ear level? To me, this sounds ridiculous, at least as long as it's meant to accompany a FLAT SCREEN for the visual. Once we get wraparound screens above and below and behind, THEN an audio system like this would make sense to me. Anything more complicated than 5.1 is a novelty like lace on a bowling ball. And for home television even that's pushing it, as far as I'm concerned.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 09-12-2005 11:02 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Even though the "4K" (or "7K") TV thing from NHK is largely vaporware I'm not at all surprised to see that electronics folks are already at work on stuff to replace current HDTV standards. Welcome to the wonderful world of digital technology where anything you buy (like a computer) becomes obsolete at an ever faster pace.

 |  IP: Logged

Andy Summers
Master Film Handler

Posts: 397
From: Bournemouth Dorset United kingdom
Registered: Jun 2005


 - posted 09-19-2005 03:47 PM      Profile for Andy Summers         Edit/Delete Post 
So what is (UHDTV) “Ultra High Definition Television” what is wrong with (HDTV) then as we Brits have been reading slowly up on this and feeling depressed, so getting the image as film like, but it’s still digital, and since I haven’t seen an A&B testing side by side of (35mm) VS (DVD) or (HDTV) and this (UHDTV) like “Richard Edlund” said-

-The closer you get to (DLP) the blacks become easier to see, and the pixels really stand out, and unlike 35mm with it’s soft grain and golf balls, your really trading one artefact from the other, man I have seen some chronic digital TV broadcasts around a friends and the greens, like the football pitch was hurting my eyes, WOW can I see the pixels BIG TIME, unlike DVD very few have I seen with lots of errors per second or milliseconds, British digital TV is only fit for peasants.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 09-19-2005 09:01 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Nobody cares about England or anything over there. Why has this been mentioned?

 |  IP: Logged

Andy Summers
Master Film Handler

Posts: 397
From: Bournemouth Dorset United kingdom
Registered: Jun 2005


 - posted 09-20-2005 12:41 PM      Profile for Andy Summers         Edit/Delete Post 
Joe’

I think under that cynical shell of yours you a deep hearted sentimentalist……

[puke]

[ 09-20-2005, 05:34 PM: Message edited by: Andy Summers ]

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.