Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » The Afterlife   » Stereophonic re-mixes of mono soundtracks (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Stereophonic re-mixes of mono soundtracks
Christian Appelt
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 505
From: Frankfurt, Germany
Registered: Dec 2001


 - posted 12-05-2005 06:01 PM      Profile for Christian Appelt   Email Christian Appelt   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The only Perspecta-to-Dolby-SVA remix I ever saw was in a 35mm studio print of LUST FOR LIFE (1954), and it sounded quite accurate. As for DVDs, I wish they would always include the original mono track - I hate those "reprocessed" mono tracks. FLIGHT OF THE PHOENIX was definitely spoiled for me by the tinny, hollow pseudo-stereo remix. AS long as they can put "5.1 Dolby Digital" on the box... [Frown]

BTW, some studios never care to find stereo versions of foreign language dubs. In Germany, nearly every 70mm spectacle has been issued on DVD with the English version in 5.1 multichannel and the dubbed version in plain mono from optical sound, although these versions exist in perfectly usable archival and collector's prints. MY FAIR LADY, AROUND THE WORLD IN 80 DAYS, EL CID and many CinemaScope 4-track productions come to my mind.

 |  IP: Logged

John Koutsoumis
Master Film Handler

Posts: 261
From: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 12-05-2005 07:09 PM      Profile for John Koutsoumis   Email John Koutsoumis   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The "White Christmas" DVD has the restored mono track as well as the 5.1. "High Society" was a great multi' channel mix. All the Musical numbers were possibly 3 channel stereo originally. For the most part the effects and dialogue are center channel and the rest kick in with the musical numbers which I think is a nice touch, especially if you have a great sound system.

But I agree in most cases in they should also have restored mono tracks. On the other hand although I haven't heard it in full 5.1 "A Clockwork Orange" sounds better in stereo than the mono track I experienced when I saw it in 35mm 2 years ago.

 |  IP: Logged

William Hooper
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1879
From: Mobile, AL USA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 12-06-2005 12:36 AM      Profile for William Hooper   Author's Homepage   Email William Hooper   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If Chace or someone has created fake stereo for the track from mono, beware of ugly flangy mushy artifacts & sound if it's played back in mono.

 |  IP: Logged

John Koutsoumis
Master Film Handler

Posts: 261
From: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 12-06-2005 07:09 AM      Profile for John Koutsoumis   Email John Koutsoumis   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Any titles in particalur that are done by Chace or other baddies?? Would they have been invloved in the stereo mix of "North by Northwest" that is heard on the deluxe special edition Laserdisc? Don't know of the foley effects were re-done but on the stereo track they are very loud!

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 12-17-2005 10:16 PM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
William, that's a good rule of thumb when playing back any pseudo-stereo mix -- NEVER sum the channels back to mono. One of the main tricks that almost every pseudo-stereo generator employs is adding delay in varing amounts to various slices of the audio spectrum. It's usually added at specific frequences with different time values. Mixing this stuff back to mono usuall makes it sound like the track it's playing from a speaker under water, what with all the flanging going on.

 |  IP: Logged

Claude S. Ayakawa
Film God

Posts: 2738
From: Waipahu, Hawaii, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 12-24-2005 03:26 AM      Profile for Claude S. Ayakawa   Author's Homepage   Email Claude S. Ayakawa   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Regarding Mark's comment about the Chase stereo remix for "THE HIGH & THE MIGHTY". I do agree with him about how unimpressed he was with sound. Yes, the film was released in four track mag stereo and I did see it presented it that way in 1954 when it was first released. The theatrical stereo mix was awesome and featured discrete sound in the front sound field with awesome mono surround. I was hoping the original stereo mix was preserved but I think I read about Jack L. Warner ordering all stereo recordings at Warner Brothers erased so the tapes could be reused. The sound on the DVD was ok but no way as great as the original theatrical presentaion.

-Claude

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Linfesty
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1383
From: Bakersfield, CA, USA
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 12-24-2005 12:23 PM      Profile for Paul Linfesty   Email Paul Linfesty   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
HOwever, in the case of THE HIGH AND THE MIGHTY, they did have the original mixes (although in bad condition). They changed it anyway.

 |  IP: Logged

Ron Lacheur
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 650
From: British Columbia, Canada
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 01-08-2006 06:56 PM      Profile for Ron Lacheur   Email Ron Lacheur   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Paul Linfesty
AFAIK, the DVD features the correct 4-track mix, albeit with a clipped high end (to get rid of that "hiss" that Fox loves to do.
Rolling off the higher frequencies is not an acceptable method of eliminating hiss. If they had the budget to do a correct audio restoration, I'm sure they would have ran it through a Cedar NR unit.

It's questionable as to how many of these " remixes " are actual remixes. There is a plugin available for the TC 6000 called " Unwrap " which will pull a stereo source and create a 5.1 enviroment.

 |  IP: Logged

Robert Harris
Film Handler

Posts: 95
From: Bedford Hills, NY, USA
Registered: May 2003


 - posted 01-17-2006 09:26 AM      Profile for Robert Harris   Email Robert Harris   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
A few thoughts re: stereo re-mixes...

Our ability to derive quality audio is based solely upon the survival of prime elements, and the intent of the studio at the time of the production.

Many films which were released as monaural or Perspecta had stereo music stems in either 3 or 4 track. Some of the studio productions from the 1940s were recorded with multiple mikes, which allow for the creation of stereo, although that may not have been the original intent.

North by Northwest is a good example of a film for which the original stems had survived.

As to some specifics...

Lawrence was recorded as a 4 track, however the master would not run in '87 and the audio was derived from the print master (the mag used to sound hundreds of mag prints), in addition to newly recorded dialogue and older bits and pieces.

Some of the original 6 track masters for Spartacus had survived from either preview or roadshow cuts, with superb audio.

My Fair Lady, which was a 4 track original, was missing several units of 4 track, which necessitated the use of the 6 track print master, which had been overused and was missing high end. Intercutting the two sounded wrong from a quality position.

"Vertigo" was an interesting case, as no original mixed audio survived, and no magnetic dialogue or effects. The best quality was found on used 35mm prints. We did, however, locate the original music floor recordings, some of which were mono and some 3 track stereo. The sound was and is incredibly clean and superb. While a proper restored soundtrack using the stereo music was researched and planned, the studio desired a more "modern" sound, hence the added effects tracks, of which no one one the restoration team is terribly fond, but the studio pays the bills and makes those decisions. We were simply "out-voted." The tracks can still be re-done properly and to Hich's specs. Birds in the dead forest was not in Hitchcock's notes.

Please also note that many DVDs use the term 5.1 not as a reference to the reality of the tracks, but rather, to the holding technology available, and into which the tracks have been placed. Occasionally, we'll see this correctly stated as 3.0 or 4.0.

Hope this is helpful.

RAH

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.