|
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
|
Author
|
Topic: VHS, 30, dies of loneliness
|
|
|
Hillary Charles
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 748
From: York, PA, USA
Registered: Feb 2001
|
posted 12-11-2006 08:25 AM
My Quasar "Great Time Machine" has one tape, but I've never been curious enough about what's on the tape to try to resurrect it. It's pretty funky lookin.'
We gave away a couple of top-loading U-matic 3/4" decks two years ago. They probably worked, but needed belts.
But those RCA Selectavision Videodisc clips are very cool! We still have two early-generation players (1 RCA and 1 Zenith version) plus, I had gotten a stereo version when the prices dropped WAY down. I also have about 75 movies on CED disc.
Those clips were very accurate in showing what the picture looked like (allowing for the compression used on the site). The occasional horizontal lines, the part when it started to skip; good times, good times. When they first came out, the picture appeared sharper than VHS, which seamed "smeared" to me, and at the time, pre-recorded VHS tapes were ~$90 while the CED discs were usually $20.
The big problem was that the more you played them, the more chance for dirt to accumulate on the disc, then you get more lines, skipping, or a total picture meltdown. If you've used these, you probably know what I mean. Hopefully, removing and reinserting the disc would clear it up, but sometimes not.
The artwork on the disc caddies were often nice, though. ![[Wink]](wink.gif) [ 12-11-2006, 02:18 PM: Message edited by: Hillary Charles ]
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen Furley
Film God

Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002
|
posted 02-06-2009 06:06 PM
I haven't touched a U-Matic machine for getting on for a decade now, but while clearing out the upper floors of the building for the builders to move in last year I came across three tapes of unknown material. There's a machine still in storage in the College which hasn't been used for several years, but I fished it out today to see what was on the tapes. It's nothing terribly interesting, but for tapes recorded in 1987, on a format going back to about 1971, the quality really isn't at all bad. Ok, it's not exactly Quad, or 'C' format, and it will always have the limitations of being a composite format, but within those limitations, it really is pretty good. It also shows up just how bloody awful VHS really is. To my eye, even these old, low-band, U-matic tapes look not only much better than VHS, but also better than later S-VHS ones.
I've got some off-air recordings stored away on U-Matic somewhere, some low-band and some high. I'll have to get them out and have a look at.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|