Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » The Afterlife   » 2001, A SPACE ODDYSSEY (1968) on BD is great but------ (Page 3)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: 2001, A SPACE ODDYSSEY (1968) on BD is great but------
John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 08-17-2009 08:45 PM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Days Of Heaven was indeed shot in 35mm.

 |  IP: Logged

Martin Brooks
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 900
From: Forest Hills, NY, USA
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 09-18-2009 10:41 PM      Profile for Martin Brooks   Author's Homepage   Email Martin Brooks   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
One curious thing about 2001 is that my recollection of seeing it in 1968 at the Boston Cinerama is that when the ape-like creature throws the bone into the air and it became the spaceship, the angle of the bone and the spaceship at the cut was exactly the same - so much so that the audience gasped at the edit.

But when I've watched it on DVD or the new BluRay, it's not quite right. Is my memory faulty or is it that the deeply curved Cinerama screen made it work and seeing it on a flat screen destroys the illusion?

And yes, 2001 is a slower moving film than the hyperactive trash that gets released today. That's because Kramer had far more respect for the intelligence of the audience than directors do today. The film was not designed with the intention to attract horny 14-year-old boys who consume tons of sugar and think a literary exercise is being a criminal in a videgame (or those same boys now supposedly "grown up").

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Slycord
Film God

Posts: 2986
From: 청주시, 경북도, South Korea
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 09-19-2009 02:03 AM      Profile for Chris Slycord   Email Chris Slycord   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Martin Brooks
And yes, 2001 is a slower moving film than the hyperactive trash that gets released today. That's because Kramer had far more respect for the intelligence of the audience than directors do today.
Kramer showed his respect for intelligence by not directing this movie?

Stanley Kramer != Stanley Kubrick

Courtesy of google and this hyperactive "youngster" (I do have ADHD) [Razz]

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 09-19-2009 02:41 AM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
At the VILLA in SLC in October of 1968: Massive 120ft screen with that huge curve all covered up in a great curtain.

Then, the lights go down curtains opens up to the side and ...

.........a modern drawn MGM trademark..... [Eek!] hits the screen.

...no classic "Leo the Lion" trademark....!

Such disappointment at the beginning...

Excellent presentation! Century "JJ"s with Ashcraft Super Corelites doing the honors of an excellent 70mm presentation.
(booth originally was a Cinerama booth with its respective wing booths for the other panels..)

My first 70mm viewing experience. Sadly, never got the chance to run that film gauge - even with IMAX..

..oh well - good movie anywhos. I have it on Laserdisk in widescreen in the CAV format.

-Monte

 |  IP: Logged

Damien Taylor
Master Film Handler

Posts: 493
From: Perth, Western Australia
Registered: Apr 2007


 - posted 09-19-2009 05:59 AM      Profile for Damien Taylor   Email Damien Taylor   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I always thought the gold stylized lion on the blue background were period correct? Is this the one you mean Monte?

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 09-19-2009 07:56 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
That is the CORRECT MGM logo for 2001...despite it not being a classy as the live Leo....sorry.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.