Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » The Afterlife   » DTS announces DTS:X Object-Based Codec (Page 3)

 
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
Author Topic: DTS announces DTS:X Object-Based Codec
Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 05-26-2015 09:46 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Daniel Schulz
As I understand it, we will not see movies releasing with something called DTS:X audio, as there will just be the SMPTE-standardized, immersive soundtrack (I'm actually quite curious to see how Dolby tries to maintain the Atmos brand for soundtracks that are an interoperable bitstream).
The problem is with as much money as it costs to install a properly equipped & configured immersive sound system the theater will need some way to brand it. After spending all that money they need a simple way to tell the public, "this isn't plain surround sound; this is something a whole lot better."

Dolby Atmos at least has that kind of branding. The Atmos logo is finally showing up on end credits of Atmos-mixed movies on a consistent basis, it has a home theater tie-in, at least some movie theaters are advertising they have Atmos. Finally it is a component of Dolby Cinema, which could give IMAX some challenges at least in some higher end markets.

If the technology is going to be handled in a generic manner the movie theater operator will have little if any reason to install something other than conventional 5.1 or 7.1. There is even a lot of premium priced theaters, like the aforementioned Carmike Big D houses, that are just plain 7.1. Out of nearly 30 Big D houses Carmike has only 1 Atmos equipped Big D house and only 1 with Auro.

 |  IP: Logged

Jonathan Goeldner
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1360
From: Washington, District of Columbia
Registered: Jun 2008


 - posted 05-26-2015 10:31 PM      Profile for Jonathan Goeldner   Email Jonathan Goeldner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
^ Starplex Luxury Cinemas 11 in Ashburn Virginia, did the same with their speciality "IDX" screen it's just 7.1 surround sound

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 05-27-2015 12:20 AM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Most of Regal's RPX theaters have only 5.1 or 7.1 surround. Only about a dozen (or it is 20?) of those theaters have Atmos. Just a few are equipped with Auro.

Cinemark built over 100 XD screens initially equipped with 7.1 surround. Then they put in Auro, which kind of gets rid of the 7.1 component. But all those XD screens might as well be just 5.1 or 7.1 considering the dire lack of Auro-mixed titles.

 |  IP: Logged

Jonathan Goeldner
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1360
From: Washington, District of Columbia
Registered: Jun 2008


 - posted 05-27-2015 12:28 AM      Profile for Jonathan Goeldner   Email Jonathan Goeldner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Most of Regal's RPX theaters have only 5.1 or 7.1 surround. Only about a dozen (or it is 20?) of those theaters have Atmos. Just a few are equipped with Auro.

Cinemark built over 100 XD screens initially equipped with 7.1 surround. Then they put in Auro, which kind of gets rid of the 7.1 component. But all those XD screens might as well be just 5.1 or 7.1 considering the dire lack of Auro-mixed titles.

[face palm]

 |  IP: Logged

Daniel Schulz
Master Film Handler

Posts: 387
From: Los Angeles, CA USA
Registered: Sep 2003


 - posted 05-27-2015 02:44 AM      Profile for Daniel Schulz   Author's Homepage   Email Daniel Schulz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Bobby Henderson
Cinemark built over 100 XD screens initially equipped with 7.1 surround. Then they put in Auro, which kind of gets rid of the 7.1 component. But all those XD screens might as well be just 5.1 or 7.1 considering the dire lack of Auro-mixed titles.
I don't think they're doing too badly on titles releasing with Auro-3D soundtracks. Recent and upcoming titles: Unbroken, American Sniper, Jupiter Ascending, Insurgent, Home, The Age of Adaline, Minions, Pixels.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 05-27-2015 04:07 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
That's not too bad of a list, but Auro is missing a lot of huge titles Atmos is getting all to itself, like the Avengers sequel, Mad Max: Fury road, Inside Out and a bunch of other summer titles.

On top of that Auro has little if any exclusive releases. All the movies you mentioned above had Atmos mixes alongside Auro.

Auro and its Auromax format would stand to benefit the most by a SMPTE move to have a single "generic" immersive audio track on DCPs. But, just like I've criticized Atmos installations for possibly being all over the map from minimal to maximum configurations, how is any movie theater customer going to be able to tell if a Cinemark XD theater is only wired for basic Auro or wired up for Auromax?

These days there's way too much pomp and circumstance with how premium movie theater auditoriums are branded and not anywhere near enough specifics to let customers know how much value or how little value they're getting for that premium ticket price.

 |  IP: Logged

Jonathan Goeldner
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1360
From: Washington, District of Columbia
Registered: Jun 2008


 - posted 12-08-2015 02:01 PM      Profile for Jonathan Goeldner   Email Jonathan Goeldner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
big new news that another major studio's home theater division has jumped on the DTS-X bandwagon - Unversal and their upcoming release of 'Crimson Peak' (they should have remixed 'Jurassic World' and 'Furious 7' as such, two major tent pole franchise's that should have object based mixes created in the first place and released theatrically as such).

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 12-08-2015 08:38 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Crimson Peak had a conventional sound mix for its theatrical release. DTS:X is getting off to a quick start being used more in home theater than on the theatrical end of things. Not to be left out, studios like Sony, are re-releasing older catalog titles like Bram Stokers Dracula and Leon: The Professional on Blu-ray with Dolby Atmos mixes.

It's shades of the whole Dolby Surround•EX and DTS-ES thing all over again: used more in home theater than in movie theaters. Hell, the object based mixes might actually be more involving in some cases (which is a reminder about the Atmos mix of some movies seeming to be Atmos in name only).
[Roll Eyes]

 |  IP: Logged

Matt Russell
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 142
From: Aurora, USA
Registered: Aug 2015


 - posted 12-09-2015 12:20 AM      Profile for Matt Russell     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I never understood why Universal wouldn't give their big-budget tentpoles an Atmos mix, like Jurassic World and Furious 7 as said but instead give smaller (in terms of budget and genre) films like Minions and Crimson Peak the full package. At least they should give the Blu-Rays an Atmos mix...but if they are jumping on the DTS:X boat, they should really expand the option to both types of films (big and small).

 |  IP: Logged

Daniel Schulz
Master Film Handler

Posts: 387
From: Los Angeles, CA USA
Registered: Sep 2003


 - posted 12-09-2015 02:03 AM      Profile for Daniel Schulz   Author's Homepage   Email Daniel Schulz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Bobby Henderson
DTS:X is getting off to a quick start being used more in home theater than on the theatrical end of things.
I dunno if I'd call 4 titles (Ex Machina, American Ultra, The Last Witch Hunter and now Crimson Peak) a quick start, especially since there is still no hardware available that can decode these soundtracks (firmware updates for Denon and Marantz AVRs to enable DTS:X decoding is supposed to be released starting in January). Dolby has a serious lead on them at this point, with home Atmos hardware available for more than year, and around 30 movies plus the first two seasons of Game of Thrones on Blu Ray with Atmos soundtracks.

 |  IP: Logged

Jonathan Goeldner
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1360
From: Washington, District of Columbia
Registered: Jun 2008


 - posted 12-09-2015 08:28 AM      Profile for Jonathan Goeldner   Email Jonathan Goeldner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
the problem was that DTS-X was rushed to the home theater market with buggy technology that hasn't even really been resolved.

I can't speak for Universal or the filmmakers themselves, but at one point 'Jurassic World' WAS going to be released in Atmos (according to Dolby's website) but that got jettisoned at the last minute.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 12-09-2015 09:36 AM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Matt Russell
I never understood why Universal wouldn't give their big-budget tentpoles an Atmos mix, like Jurassic World and Furious 7 as said but instead give smaller (in terms of budget and genre) films like Minions and Crimson Peak the full package.
I agree it's pretty screwy Universal released high profile titles like Furious 7 and Jurassic World only with "plain" 5.1/7.1 audio. No Atmos, Auro, etc. But they could always come back and do double dip releases with an updated DTS:X and/or Dolby Atmos track for home theater.

Crimson Peak didn't have an immersive audio mix in its theatrical release. In the case of Minions, Dreamworks Animation has lately been creating Atmos and Auro mixes for all their releases.

quote: Daniel Schulz
I dunno if I'd call 4 titles (Ex Machina, American Ultra, The Last Witch Hunter and now Crimson Peak) a quick start, especially since there is still no hardware available that can decode these soundtracks (firmware updates for Denon and Marantz AVRs to enable DTS:X decoding is supposed to be released starting in January).
Nevertheless, DTS:X is appearing to do more in home theater than it is doing in commercial cinemas. Right off the bat Ex Machina was a home theater only release for DTS:X. That movie only had conventional audio in its theatrical release. DTS:X compatible hardware may be lagging behind the release of Blu-ray discs with DTS:X, but the receivers will be coming. Unlike the very murky situation of just what DTS:X could be in a commercial movie theater there at least appears to be some level of suggested speaker configuration standard in a home theater setup (and it looks a bit like an Auro 3D setup to me).

Dolby Atmos in home theater is a mixed bag. A lot of movies that had Atmos mixes in theatrical release have had Blu-ray discs with DTS-HD Master Audio instead, even after Atmos for home theater became available. I wonder if the lack of Windows-compatible Atmos encoding software has anything to do with that. All commercial Blu-ray discs are authored on PCs running Windows-based software. Dolby's audio encoding software is Mac-only. DTS' audio encoding software supports Mac & Windows platforms.

The Gunman is the only recent American movie release I can think of that didn't appear to have an Atmos mix in theatrical release, but it has an Atmos track on Blu-ray. Lately Sony has been reissuing older movies on Blu-ray with new Atmos mixes. It's pretty unusual for HBO Home Video to re-release Game of Thrones on Blu-ray with new Atmos mixes. That could be a game changer and put more attention on the home theater side of things, especially with how painfully slow Atmos adoption in commercial theaters is going. The lack of Atmos-equipped screens makes it pretty difficult, if not impossible, for many people to watch a movie presented in Atmos in a commercial theater. So in a lot of cases the only way people are going to see some movies in Atmos is by doing so with a home theater setup.

 |  IP: Logged

Connor Wilson
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 190
From: Sterling, VA, USA
Registered: Jan 2011


 - posted 12-26-2015 12:40 PM      Profile for Connor Wilson   Email Connor Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I don't know if this is relevant or can stand on its own in a different topic but I'd like to report that the DTS:X mix on the Ex Machina Blu-ray is mainly one of the examples of when people here talk negatively about near-field mixes. I don't have a DTS:X setup, but I have a 7.1 + Back Surround Sub-Bass system at home to listen with. Thankfully, the theatrical 5.1 mix of the film is also available on the same disc, albeit 768 kbps lossy DTS, so I was able to compare the two.

A couple of examples. In the beginning of the movie, when Domhnall Gleeson approaches the entrance of the research facility, the outdoor ambiance has sort of a treble cut in the DTS:X mix whereas in the theatrical it's more flat. I had my THX Re-EQ and Cinema filters on for both tracks (as well as my manual EQ settings) and the DTS:X is stereotypically near-field in that respect. Also later in the film, when Gleeson and Isaac discuss Ava's sexuality, the ambiance is much louder in the DTS:X, leveling with the dialogue, whereas the ambiance is quieter in the theatrical. Overall, the DTS:X mix feels hollow, and ironically, the theatrical DTS has more channel separation.

When I saw Ex Machina in the theaters twice, I took notice of the incredibly dynamic 5.1 mix and its deep low-end crawling all the way to the surrounds. It's mostly a very quiet movie, and usually the loudest moments are musical cues and the helicopter fly-by in the very beginning. I was hoping those aspects of the theatrical mix would be retained in the DTS:X remix, but I wasn't surprised they'd eventually dumb it down. A lossless version of the theatrical mix should be on the UK Blu-ray.

Now this raises my anxieties of Sicario's inevitable DTS:X mix on the upcoming Blu-ray. I should have less anxieties as Sicario did feature a DTS:X mix theatrically, as well as a Dolby Atmos mix, but the standard 5.1 in theaters was still incredible, and perhaps one of the best-sounding movies of its year.

 |  IP: Logged

Jonathan Goeldner
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1360
From: Washington, District of Columbia
Registered: Jun 2008


 - posted 12-27-2015 10:03 PM      Profile for Jonathan Goeldner   Email Jonathan Goeldner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
'Sicario' was supposed to be DTS-X for it's bluray release but it got changed over Dolby Atmos for some reason. 'The Last Witch Hunter' (from Lionsgate) is also coming out with DTS-X.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 12-27-2015 10:25 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Why couldn't the Blu-ray disc for Sicario support both DTS-X and Dolby Atmos mixes? Both formats reside within DTS-HD and Dolby TrueHD cores. It's not unheard of for a Blu-ray disc to have both DTS-HD and Dolby TrueHD audio on the same disc.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.