Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » The Afterlife   » explain curved TV sets to me (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: explain curved TV sets to me
Jesse Skeen
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1517
From: Sacramento, CA
Registered: Aug 2000


 - posted 10-14-2015 02:44 AM      Profile for Jesse Skeen   Email Jesse Skeen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Louis Bornwasser
The bigger problem is that the over-the-air TV stations are changing digital formats in a couple of years. Yes, you will need a new set.
Big whoop- 99% of TV is an unwatchable mess (presentation-wise), and the current digital format uses far too much compression- even on stations that don't have sub-channels. I didn't get an HD TV til about a year after the analog stations went off and it was very nice not having that crap coming into my living room at all!

Curved TVs are dumb- for decades we put up with imperfect geometry on CRTs, now they can actually make the damn screen perfectly flat as it should be and someone decides to mess that up.

 |  IP: Logged

Lyle Romer
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1400
From: Davie, FL, USA
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 10-14-2015 08:22 AM      Profile for Lyle Romer   Email Lyle Romer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think that curved TVs fall into the category of "just because you can, doesn't mean you should."

It's nothing more than a sales gimmick. Since 3D didn't cause people to replace TVs and 4k doesn't have nearly enough content yet to cause people to replace TVs, they had to come up with something different.

 |  IP: Logged

Daniel Schulz
Master Film Handler

Posts: 387
From: Los Angeles, CA USA
Registered: Sep 2003


 - posted 10-14-2015 09:58 AM      Profile for Daniel Schulz   Author's Homepage   Email Daniel Schulz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Jesse Skeen
Big whoop- 99% of TV is an unwatchable mess (presentation-wise), and the current digital format uses far too much compression- even on stations that don't have sub-channels.
I really beg to differ. Program quality is hit-or-miss, as it's always been, but there's great TV on air right now. As far as picture quality, on my plasma TV, over an antenna, on the prime time shows that the networks really care about I am getting stunning picture quality.

 |  IP: Logged

Jack Ondracek
Film God

Posts: 2348
From: Port Orchard, WA, USA
Registered: Oct 2002


 - posted 10-14-2015 02:32 PM      Profile for Jack Ondracek   Author's Homepage   Email Jack Ondracek   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Daniel Schulz
Back to the OP, I'm in the anti-curve camp, I just don't get it. Added reflections, image distortion, reducing the number of "sweet spots" for viewing...makes no sense to me.
I looked at one of those at Costco, and my impression was they went way overboard, looking for demo images with lots of well-defined, sharp edges... just like you see everywhere in real life ( [Roll Eyes] ). Then, just to make sure you noticed, they found a 70's vintage comb filter and ran everything through it.

Yes... they can draw a line so sharp you might feel just looking at it could cut your eyeballs. What makes something like that a "must have" for nearly $4kBucks?

Then, there's the issue of content. Is it true that none of the current live distribution schemes can take full advantage of what these things can display? Are you then left to build a Blu-Ray library?

 |  IP: Logged

Martin McCaffery
Film God

Posts: 2481
From: Montgomery, AL
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-14-2015 02:41 PM      Profile for Martin McCaffery   Author's Homepage   Email Martin McCaffery   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Do people still watch TV in groups? I don't have a TV or family, so I really don't know. If everyone watches on their own, theoretically having various sweet spots won't matter. Assuming those single people watching are fixed in the sweet spot and not wandering around doing dishes or chatting on the phone, etc.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 10-14-2015 04:35 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I agree applying a curve to a TV screen is a gimmick. It's meant to imitate a curved movie theater screen, but without actually delivering any real viewing benefit over a normal flat TV screen.

I would be suspicious of curved computer monitors. Unless the unit is a high quality monitor its color uniformity and accuracy might stink at any viewing angle. It might be kind of cool to have three curved monitors in a wrap-around configuration for some kinds of gaming.

I think LG had a curved smart phone. Not sure if that thing is selling at all.

They're even doing this curved screen stuff with some LED jumbotron signs. The Cleveland Cavaliers have a huge new scoreboard hanging over the court featuring four curved LED displays. Two are 56¾' X 31½' in size, flanked by 33' X 30' boards on the ends. The builder, ANC Sports, says the new scoreboard will give the highest paying customers near courtside the best views. Meanwhile everyone else will get a more shitty view.

I think the novelty of those curved screens will wear off soon.

Some OLED TVs are starting to come down in price. LG has a 55" model that has come down to $3000, which is a bargain compared to what big OLED TV sets normally cost. I wonder if this means electronics companies are finally overcoming the production challenges to making large OLED panels in quantity.

I think OLED, in combination with things like REC 2020 color space, HDR, Dolby Vision, etc. will sell a lot of TV sets -at least a lot more than those curved models. But then again, the price has to be right. It's a lot easier to pull the trigger on a TV purchase when the price is under $2000. When it's over $3000 it's easier to wait.

quote: Daniel Schulz
I really beg to differ. Program quality is hit-or-miss, as it's always been, but there's great TV on air right now. As far as picture quality, on my plasma TV, over an antenna, on the prime time shows that the networks really care about I am getting stunning picture quality.
The image quality I get from my outdoor antenna easily blows away the re-broadcast version coming from Dish. There just isn't any contest.

It seems pretty logical for ATSC 3.0 to leave behind MPEG-2, jump over MPEG-4 and go with HEVC. I'm a little concerned about the variable bit rate nature in the new standard. It's probably a given TV stations will keep on multi-casting multiple channels in their frequency space. But the efficiency of HEVC could give some bean counter the idea of dividing the TV station's spectrum into a bunch more channels rather than have a nice 4K channel.

 |  IP: Logged

Jesse Skeen
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1517
From: Sacramento, CA
Registered: Aug 2000


 - posted 10-16-2015 05:38 PM      Profile for Jesse Skeen   Email Jesse Skeen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Daniel Schulz
As far as picture quality, on my plasma TV, over an antenna, on the prime time shows that the networks really care about I am getting stunning picture quality.
So stunning that you get to stare at a constant network logo, in the 4x3-safe area no less. NBC even puts up full-time text promos for other shows next to it now, and I see that ABC now puts the word "FUNNY" onscreen during all of its comedy shows, I guess so you don't forget to laugh. And even on shows without these annoyances, I've NEVER seen a broadcast here that didn't have noticeable compression artifacts. The CW (Can't Watch!) station here runs all of its non-network shows bug-free in 1080i and has NO subchannels taking away bandwidth, yet whenever I turn that on and a show has a dark scene, there's dancing pixels. If it were something I actually wanted to watch, I'd be pretty upset.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-16-2015 08:33 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I had "The Price is Right" on yesterday morning and they had a "countdown to Thursday Night Football" thing in the bottom 1/4 of the screen. And the networks why they're losing audience share.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.