Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » The Afterlife   » QSC or JBL Pro for home theater? (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: QSC or JBL Pro for home theater?
Haris Ellahi
Film Handler

Posts: 23
From: Dubai, UAE
Registered: Mar 2017


 - posted 04-10-2017 12:34 PM      Profile for Haris Ellahi     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks for the replies.

Honestly speaking, a full Seaton Sound setup is my first choice at the moment. I was just exploring the possibilities of using "real" cinema speakers in case it might offer a better movie experience. However, based on everything I've read, Seaton Sound has an excellent reputation as some of the best home theater speakers you can get. They are basically a mix-breed of pro audio and "audiophilish" speakers. I actually own one SubMersive right now and love it.

Looks like some may know Seaton Sound on this forum such as Daniel.

 |  IP: Logged

Marcel Birgelen
Film God

Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012


 - posted 04-12-2017 03:52 AM      Profile for Marcel Birgelen   Email Marcel Birgelen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I do know Seaton Sound, although I don't have any real experience with it.

For small-scale setups, there certainly are lots of alternatives that will most likely better fit the needs of your room. Triad, for example, builds speakers that are specifically targeted at the more professional home theater builds.

Still, most of the more esoteric stuff is more expensive than the professional equipment that goes into your average theater. In the case the budget is there, I'd just go for the professional gear any given moment, because that's the stuff I know. And that way, you're at least spending your money on stuff that matters and not some wonky design or stuff like astronomically priced speaker cables that you need to believe in, to make it sound better. [Wink]

 |  IP: Logged

Haris Ellahi
Film Handler

Posts: 23
From: Dubai, UAE
Registered: Mar 2017


 - posted 04-14-2017 08:50 AM      Profile for Haris Ellahi     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Any opinions/comments on Klipsch Pro speakers?

 |  IP: Logged

Alan Gouger
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 501
From: Bradenton, FL, USA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 04-14-2017 09:49 AM      Profile for Alan Gouger   Author's Homepage   Email Alan Gouger   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Haris if going with pro cinema gear for audio what are you considering for the projector.

Regards.

 |  IP: Logged

Haris Ellahi
Film Handler

Posts: 23
From: Dubai, UAE
Registered: Mar 2017


 - posted 04-14-2017 10:27 AM      Profile for Haris Ellahi     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Due to my relatively small room and short viewing distance, I am considering the Stewart Filmscreen StudioTek 100 screen (16:9 100" diagonal) in solid form (not micro-perf). For the projector, I am not sure at the moment but probably something from JVC or Sony.

Right now I am strongly leaning towards a full Seaton Sound setup for speakers/subwoofers.

 |  IP: Logged

Haris Ellahi
Film Handler

Posts: 23
From: Dubai, UAE
Registered: Mar 2017


 - posted 04-15-2017 04:10 PM      Profile for Haris Ellahi     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Any comments/opinions on the following setup?

Processor: Arcam AV860 or Acurus ACT 4
Amplifiers: 2 x JBL Synthesis SDA 4600 + 1 x JBL Synthesis SDA 8300
Mains: 2 x JBL Pro M2
Center: 1 x JBL Pro M2
Side surrounds: 2 x JBL Pro 9300 or 8320
Back surrounds: 2 x JBL Pro 9300 or 8320
Ceiling speakers: 4 x JBL Pro SCS 8
Subwoofers: 2 x Seaton Sound SubMersive HPi+ + 2 x Seaton Sound SubMersive HP-Slave

I've heard pretty amazing stuff about the M2s.

 |  IP: Logged

Haris Ellahi
Film Handler

Posts: 23
From: Dubai, UAE
Registered: Mar 2017


 - posted 04-19-2017 12:46 PM      Profile for Haris Ellahi     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Slightly off-topic...

Can a woven AT screen work with a viewing distance of roughly 7 ft? Or will visual artifacts be too visible from this viewing distance? I've heard good things about the DreamScreen V6 UltraWeave AT Screen which is known to have a very tight weave.

https://dreamscreen.no/collections/projection-screens/products/dreamscreen-acoustic-ultrahd-v6-screen-fabric-2x4-5m-79-x-177-fit-all-system

 |  IP: Logged

Marcel Birgelen
Film God

Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012


 - posted 04-24-2017 09:55 AM      Profile for Marcel Birgelen   Email Marcel Birgelen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
For very short viewing distances, I prefer a woven screen v.s. a perforated screen, even mico-perf can still be visible or create moire in small rooms.

I have no real experience with DreamScreen, if you're looking for an audio transparent screen for close viewing distances, you should really try to get a look at it yourself and check if the structure of the fabric is still visible at your viewing distances.

 |  IP: Logged

Haris Ellahi
Film Handler

Posts: 23
From: Dubai, UAE
Registered: Mar 2017


 - posted 04-24-2017 03:01 PM      Profile for Haris Ellahi     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks.

Any comments/opinions on the DT Screens AT Ref? Their website states "Surface structure indistinguishable from approximately 0.5m." Only disadvantage of the DT Screens AT Ref is the maximum height of the screen can only be up to 1.9 meters (which is fine by me as I only need a screen that is around 100" diagonal 16:9).

I'll try to get samples of the V6 UltraWeave AT Screen and the AT Ref. How large should the samples be in order to accurately sample the image of the screen?

 |  IP: Logged

Haris Ellahi
Film Handler

Posts: 23
From: Dubai, UAE
Registered: Mar 2017


 - posted 05-05-2017 06:12 PM      Profile for Haris Ellahi     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Any comments/opinions on a JBL M2 based setup vs. a Meyer Sound Acheron based setup? I've heard amazing things on the M2 and actually currently own the LSR305 monitors with the LSR310S subwoofer for my desktop computer setup. They have amazing imaging and overall sound quality but do realize the M2 is in a different universe even though they both might share some similar traits. I've also heard some great things about the Meyer Sound Acheron speakers. However, I read a thread on another forum where members compared the Meyer Sound HD-1 or Amie to the new JBL 7 Series monitors. Nearly everyone noted the much larger sound stage and great imaging on the JBLs vs. the Meyer Sound speakers (even though they also sounded great it sounded as if the sound was coming from the speakers vs. "from space"). Quite a few people preferred the JBLs. Any feedback is welcome.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.