Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » The Afterlife   » "Dunkirk" - BD has been panned and scanned! (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: "Dunkirk" - BD has been panned and scanned!
Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 01-10-2019 07:36 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
We are in an age where most disc releases have multiple copies inside...why not release it the IMAX form and the 5/70 form and be done with it. Those that want the full composition...have at it and those that one a steady state 2.2 have at it?

As for aspect ratio changes during a movie that work: "Brainstorm." Too bad the brainstorm sequences weren't ShowScan too.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-10-2019 08:58 AM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Agreed with the idea of just making two versions. Could this be done with a menu selection? I don't know much about Blu-Ray authoring, but maybe someone else here does. Or is there such a thing as a double-sided Blu-Ray? I have some DVDs like that, with the 4x3 version on one side and the wide screen version of the same movie on the other side. A two-disk version is fine, too, but I suspect that it would just give the manufacturer a reason to justify a price increase.

The changing-aspect-ratios thing would be annoying enough on a television set, but would be truly maddening for anyone who went to the trouble of installing a projection system and masking at home.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Jentsch
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1061
From: New Berlin, WI, USA
Registered: Apr 2003


 - posted 01-10-2019 10:14 AM      Profile for Scott Jentsch   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Jentsch   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Blu-rays have the ability to feature seamless branching, which allows for different scenes to be played, based on a setting that can be chosen in advance.

It hasn't been used in a lot of titles, but it is a feature that could be used exactly how you mention.

I'm not sure if 4K Ultra HD Blu-rays have that feature.

My guess is that it would be much simpler to provide another disc, but the most likely scenario is that the status quo will be maintained. The lazy attitude of catering to the lowest common denominator is very prevalent, so streaming services are going to show things in full screen on the device on which it is playing and/or what is easiest/cheapest to provide.

I hate forced IMAX aspect ratio changes, because I have a constant image height setup. If it's part of the movie, like Cape Fear or The Horse Whisperer or The Right Stuff, that's not a problem, but so many are the "ooo, let's go to full screen so that someone can see more image filling his 65" flat screen in his living room, connected to that $100 sound bar he bought at Bed Bath and Beyond."

One day, when I'm able to upgrade my projector, I'll be able to have it mask off those changes and be done with them.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 01-11-2019 01:00 PM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It is theoretically possible to make a double-sided BD, though I've never seen any. I do have a few DVD/BD combos (DVD on one side, BD on the other).

The issue is the data capacity. There is a hard limit of 50GB for a regular BD (dual layer), or 100 for a UHD (2160p) BD. You're not going to get two copies of a two-hour movie onto a single disc, therefore, unless you use a pretty low bitrate. As the cost of disc pressing is negligible for a mass-production release, I see no reason not to use multiple discs. This is what umpteen "special edition" versions do, anyway.

As I mentioned above, I do have some examples of different technical versions on a multiple disc set, Oklahoma! (Todd-AO 2.20 and CinemaScope 2.55) and The Big Trail (70mm Fox Grandeur 2.0:1 and 35mm Movietone 1.19:1), so there is a precedent for going this route.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.