Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Large Format Forum   » "STAR WARS:EPISODE 2" in IMAX opens on Friday (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: "STAR WARS:EPISODE 2" in IMAX opens on Friday
Tim Reed
Better Projection Pays

Posts: 5246
From: Northampton, PA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 11-02-2002 08:56 PM      Profile for Tim Reed   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
for now at least, filling an 80-foot IMAX screen = toasted DLP.

I think you are very right, John.

------------------
Better Projection Pays!


 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 11-03-2002 01:31 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
OK it's out now. So how does it look?

 |  IP: Logged

Adam Martin
I'm not even gonna point out the irony.

Posts: 3686
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 11-03-2002 02:25 AM      Profile for Adam Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Adam Martin       Edit/Delete Post 
The CGI looks spectacular, as expected. The live action looks acceptable to a regular movie-goer. But most of it is CGI, so what does it matter?

But to the projectionist ... everyone has a video "halo" around them and you can also notice funky stuff where they used blue screens. Some large areas like sky occasionally get jpeggy during the rare instances when the camera isn't moving. You can see the occasional jaggy edge, too. In some dark scenes, it is noticably grainier than the rest of the film. (I should note that I was specifically looking for this stuff and had to point some of it out to other projectionists.)

And, boy, does that Anakin kid wear a lot of makeup! And that tight white shirt that Padme wears? Oh, my. It must have been cold on the set.

The sound kicks much ass.

As far as the 28 minutes that were cut out, I'm told that it makes the movie better with it gone. This version moves along at a good pace and rarely slows but for a moment here and there.


 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 11-03-2002 04:20 PM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'd be curious about what rez the CGI (and the whole picture) was rerendered at.

 |  IP: Logged

Manny Knowles
"What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???"

Posts: 4247
From: Bloomington, IN, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 11-03-2002 04:27 PM      Profile for Manny Knowles   Email Manny Knowles   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It will be interesting to see if the box office take for the IMAX versions of APOLLO 13 and SWEP2 are reported separately. They ought to be, since they are -- technically -- not the same movie (err, umm....I mean "experience").

Claude wrote:

quote:
I am very pleased you had enjoyed the IMAX version of "EPISODE 11"....By the way, forgive me for being technical but the large film format is registered and known as IMAX and not I-Max.

And forgive me too, but when did they make Episodes 7 thru 10?


 |  IP: Logged

James B. Openshaw
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 106
From: Mt. Pleasant, SC, USA
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 11-03-2002 04:48 PM      Profile for James B. Openshaw   Author's Homepage   Email James B. Openshaw   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I screened this on Wed., Oct. 30.

First, the picture was decent. The CGI was very sharply displayed on the screen. The live action still looked soft however; but credit for that can go to Georgie Boy's use of the HDCAM.

As for the sound, Sonics (now offically "IMAX Digital Media") did a very impressive job on their 6-track Digital Sound, even though our DTAC hard drive is full.

In conclusion, IMAX did a very commendable job with their DMR process. I look forward to the next IMAX DMR converted movie.

BTW, for what it's worth, IMAX as I-max is still IMAX.

 |  IP: Logged

Claude S. Ayakawa
Film God

Posts: 2738
From: Waipahu, Hawaii, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 11-03-2002 06:09 PM      Profile for Claude S. Ayakawa   Author's Homepage   Email Claude S. Ayakawa   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hi Manny,

Sorry! When I typed "EPISODE 11", The '11' was suppose to be the Roman numeral '2' and not the modern number ELEVEN.

-Claude


 |  IP: Logged

Adam Martin
I'm not even gonna point out the irony.

Posts: 3686
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 11-03-2002 06:16 PM      Profile for Adam Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Adam Martin       Edit/Delete Post 
The IMAX DMR process scans the original material at a resolution of 6K, so I would assume that the CGI was re-rendered at that resolution also.

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Gabel
Film God

Posts: 3873
From: Technicolor / Postworks NY, USA
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 11-04-2002 10:01 AM      Profile for Bill Gabel   Email Bill Gabel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Just got "Star Wars: Episode 2" on DVD last Friday. It looks and sounds fantastic. So I guess I will miss the IMAX presentation.

 |  IP: Logged

Thomas Procyk
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1842
From: Royal Palm Beach, FL, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 11-04-2002 10:09 AM      Profile for Thomas Procyk   Email Thomas Procyk   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
They should re-release some old films with the IMAX DMR process that actually fit into the IMAX aspect ratio. Imagine "Gone With The Wind" having a dye-transfer made into an IMAX print. With the original intermission intact, it would certainly be possible to run that length of a movie. (or not?)

=TMP=

 |  IP: Logged

Claude S. Ayakawa
Film God

Posts: 2738
From: Waipahu, Hawaii, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 11-04-2002 11:18 AM      Profile for Claude S. Ayakawa   Author's Homepage   Email Claude S. Ayakawa   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thomas,

I would also love to see "GONE WITH THE WIND" in IMAX. I recall seeing this film for the very first time during it's many theatrical re release in Santa Barbara in the early sixties when I was a very young man studying photography and was very impressed with the sweeping visuals and wonderful story. The print I saw was a dye transfer and it was very beautiful. I think it would look great in IMAX. If a two hour film like "EPISODE 11" can be shown in IMAX, I am sure they can do it with "GWTW". Gee, the film and I are the same age. I was only three months old when it was world premiered in Atlanta that very cold December evening in 1939. Like me, great things never age

-Claude

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 11-04-2002 11:25 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
So does the movie take up the whole screen (cropped) or is it letterboxed?

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Gabel
Film God

Posts: 3873
From: Technicolor / Postworks NY, USA
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 11-04-2002 01:22 PM      Profile for Bill Gabel   Email Bill Gabel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Claude,

"Gone with the Wind" had it's second sneak preview screening at the Granada Theatre in Santa Barbara. The first was at the Fox Riverside Theatre. GWTW runs 233 minutes.

 |  IP: Logged

Adam Martin
I'm not even gonna point out the irony.

Posts: 3686
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 11-04-2002 03:02 PM      Profile for Adam Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Adam Martin       Edit/Delete Post 
Star Wars: Attack of the Clones was reformatted to about 1.66:1 with a letterbox at the top of the screen and the sides cropped off a bit.

 |  IP: Logged

Claude S. Ayakawa
Film God

Posts: 2738
From: Waipahu, Hawaii, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 11-27-2002 04:20 AM      Profile for Claude S. Ayakawa   Author's Homepage   Email Claude S. Ayakawa   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
"EPISODE TWO" ended it's Honolulu run today at the Waikiki IMAX to make room for "THREASURE PLANET" tomorrow and I had to take the atenoon off in order to see it before it left. First of all, I was very impressed with the general impact of the presentation but the picture quality was very poor with a very pale look to it and it was rather soft. Because the original was digital, the IMAX film presentation had almost the same look as the 35mm film presentation I saw earlier and did not like. THe sound however was superb! I was amazed how they shortened the credits by stacking all of the names together. As far as the film itself is concerned, the DVD is the best way to see the movie because the image quality is outstanding. I was among only ten people who saw the 2:00 PM showing today and if this trend continues, the Waikiki IMAX might eventually join the other Waikiki theatres that has all closed due to lack of business. It just pisses me off when people start bitching about the Waikiki theatres closing in our daiy newspapers "Letters to the Editor" when most of them has never supported the theatres when they needed the business. I predict that the majority of the parents with little children will take them to the nearest mall theatre to see "TREASURE PLANET" in a standard 35mm presentation instead of the IMAX showing in Waikiki. That is sad indeed! As far as I am concerned, I cannot wait to see the movie in IMAX.

-Claude

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.