Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Large Format Forum   » Are there any Imax projectors out there? (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
Author Topic: Are there any Imax projectors out there?
Adam Martin
I'm not even gonna point out the irony.

Posts: 3686
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 06-17-2004 01:48 AM      Profile for Adam Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Adam Martin       Edit/Delete Post 
RPG can go fly a kite. Most of the prints I've received from them have had one problem or another, most of which involved me spending hours upon hours replacing every splice in any given print. Eventually, we told them to stop assembling new prints for us since I was doing the work all over again anyway.

As far as tape splices go, I've had prints run thousands of passes with no tearing or stretching. It's all in the details of making the splice properly: No bubbles or gaps, the edge of the splice falls between perfs and not on them, etc. But ultrasonic splices on 1570 do kick ass. [Smile]

 |  IP: Logged

Stewart Anderson
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 105
From: Sandy, Utah /United States of America
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 06-17-2004 01:53 AM      Profile for Stewart Anderson   Author's Homepage   Email Stewart Anderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thank you Adam! [Smile]

I think our stretching problem is coming from rewinding the films on our CDC knock offs of the MK 1. Especially since 99% of the splices that stretch seem to always be near the beginning of the film (where the most tension is present on rewind).

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Mayer
Oh get out of it Melvin, before it pulls you under!

Posts: 3836
From: Albuquerque, NM
Registered: Feb 2000


 - posted 06-17-2004 02:30 AM      Profile for Paul Mayer   Author's Homepage   Email Paul Mayer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'll second Adam on the tape splices. We ran thousands and thousands of them through the old IMAX Classic projector and reel unit at Caesars and never had a problem with them. It's true that properly made ultrasonic splices are great, but we never had any issues with "pinking shear" tape splices either.

[ 06-17-2004, 12:21 PM: Message edited by: Paul Mayer ]

 |  IP: Logged

Brian Michael Weidemann
Expert cat molester

Posts: 944
From: Costa Mesa, CA United States
Registered: Feb 2004


 - posted 06-17-2004 04:20 AM      Profile for Brian Michael Weidemann   Author's Homepage   Email Brian Michael Weidemann   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Same here. Never a problem with the zig-zag tape splice, properly done, of course. Only the one connecting the academy leader to junk stock tends to stretch slightly on the one side, but that likely comes from the projector saying threaded up over hours of no-tickets-sold no-shows; constantly taut on the same stretch of film. Not getting those with Potter, though ... not yet, anyway.

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 06-17-2004 12:00 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The MK1 design of reel unit puts a lot of stress on tape splices at the head and tail of the reels.
I always assemble my own prints and use the ultrasonic splicer for the print and tape for the trailors
The zigzag can also have issues with the grade of tape used and some places seem to use poorer quality than others

 |  IP: Logged

Stewart Anderson
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 105
From: Sandy, Utah /United States of America
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 06-17-2004 01:56 PM      Profile for Stewart Anderson   Author's Homepage   Email Stewart Anderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think I might show my bosses this thread, because even after telling them all of the problems we will have with tape splices even when I'm checking them constantly we still get used/pre-built prints that are usually tape-spliced. Then after receiving a tape-spliced/pre-built print, I'm prohibited from changing those splices (to ultrasonic). [Mad] They tell me that they are cheaper and they don't have a choice [Roll Eyes] [Mad] W T F!!!

 |  IP: Logged

Bob Brown
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 146
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Registered: Apr 2002


 - posted 06-17-2004 02:34 PM      Profile for Bob Brown   Author's Homepage   Email Bob Brown   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Just my two cents here: I am running prints that Adam made up when he was at Grand Rapids. I did check the splices and did not need to change any splice. The zig-zag tape splice is, in my opinion, a great splice that will give you a long run before any problems arise. OH, as far as RPG goes, I totally agree with Adam here, I received a print from them that had ultrasonic with Tape over the ultrasonic splice, ON BOTH SIDES!! it ran kinda hard through the SR's, had to readjust the stator clearance. Adam taught me how to splice, as with anything, it is all in the person whom is operating the equipment. The better trained the better results. [thumbsup]

 |  IP: Logged

Stewart Anderson
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 105
From: Sandy, Utah /United States of America
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 06-17-2004 03:32 PM      Profile for Stewart Anderson   Author's Homepage   Email Stewart Anderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Bob, I COMPLETELY AGREE. But I also think that there is a little more to it; I think if you rate the quality of these four things (listed below) and then average those four ratings you will have a pretty accurate rating of your theaters presentation.

1. Good Equipment
2. Good Operators
3. Good Service
4. Good Prints

For example on a 1 - 10 scale:
1. Equipment 7
2. Operators 9
3. Service 7
4. Prints 5
-------
28 / 4 = 7 (70%)
And I'm sure some of these factors should pull more weight then others, but its just a simple stupid theory of mine [Smile]

P.S. The numbers were not my theater, I was just pulling numbers out of thin air to make a point.

 |  IP: Logged

Jesse August
Film Handler

Posts: 58
From: Vancouver British Columbia
Registered: Jul 2003


 - posted 06-17-2004 03:51 PM      Profile for Jesse August   Email Jesse August   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Tape splices are good for trailers, but I would never assemble a 1570 print with a tape splicer. Ultrasonic is the only way to go.

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 06-17-2004 05:55 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
First to change a splice from tape to ultrasonic or vice versa requires the insertion of 2 frames of black to replace the lost frames of the splice and maintain sync

 |  IP: Logged

Jesse August
Film Handler

Posts: 58
From: Vancouver British Columbia
Registered: Jul 2003


 - posted 06-17-2004 06:54 PM      Profile for Jesse August   Email Jesse August   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
That is why I think tape splices are good for add and removing trailers, you don't have to worry about adding black frames because you don't loose any frames.

 |  IP: Logged

Rob Butler
Film Handler

Posts: 91
From: Westford, MA, USA
Registered: Mar 2004


 - posted 06-18-2004 10:27 AM      Profile for Rob Butler   Email Rob Butler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If the time to break down a print ever comes, you'll seriously regret using ultrasonic splices.

quote: Stewart Anderson
I'm prohibited from changing those splices (to ultrasonic). They tell me that they are cheaper and they don't have a choice
So they're saying that using up your splice tape is somehow cheaper than using a splicer that doesn't use tape to begin with?

 |  IP: Logged

Jesse August
Film Handler

Posts: 58
From: Vancouver British Columbia
Registered: Jul 2003


 - posted 06-18-2004 02:13 PM      Profile for Jesse August   Email Jesse August   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I guess I'm lucky I've never had to break down a 15/70 print.

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Mayer
Oh get out of it Melvin, before it pulls you under!

Posts: 3836
From: Albuquerque, NM
Registered: Feb 2000


 - posted 06-18-2004 04:47 PM      Profile for Paul Mayer   Author's Homepage   Email Paul Mayer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've never heard of breaking down an IMAX print. At least in my experience, once they're made, they're made for good and they get shipped that way, in big and heavy cases.

 |  IP: Logged

Jesse August
Film Handler

Posts: 58
From: Vancouver British Columbia
Registered: Jul 2003


 - posted 06-18-2004 07:06 PM      Profile for Jesse August   Email Jesse August   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Come to think of it I have broken down 15/70 prints, but only in half so they would fit into two shipping cases. For example Star Wars AOTC, Apollo 13, Matrix, but these movies are longer then the ordinary 15/70 running times of 40 to 50 minutes. Other than that reason I don't see a need to break down.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.