Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Large Format Forum   » IMAX Signs contracts for up to 20 new screens (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: IMAX Signs contracts for up to 20 new screens
Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 10-13-2004 07:46 PM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If there is a market for this (MPX houses running primarily DMR blowups) then does that not prove there would be a market for 5/70 films, especially real (shot in 65mm) ones?

 |  IP: Logged

Dick Vaughan
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1032
From: Bradford, West Yorkshire, UK
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 10-20-2004 02:51 PM      Profile for Dick Vaughan   Author's Homepage   Email Dick Vaughan   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
From Larry Wiliams on 1570.com
quote:
The Buckland Hills Showcase IMAX screen, which I wrote about Sept. 3 (see posting above), will be 21 feet 4 inches high, 47 feet 9 inches wide. An aspect ratio of 2.24 to 1. Less than half as tall as the MPX screen in Lansing, Mich. I'll be attending the unveiling for the press Nov. 3. As of now, it's hard to believe it will look like IMAX, but I'm prepared to be amazed.
2.24 very close to 2.2:1 70mm 5 perf eh! [thumbsdown]

 |  IP: Logged

Darren Briggs
Master Film Handler

Posts: 371
From: York, UK
Registered: Dec 2001


 - posted 11-02-2004 12:26 PM      Profile for Darren Briggs   Author's Homepage   Email Darren Briggs   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Imax DMR seems a great way of current IMAX theatres getting some cash in, but as films like Spiderman and Matirx are Scope films, the area used on the IMAX print is very much like 2.2:1 5/70 format, and with the MPX ratio to be 2.24:1, as Dick says is very close to 5 perf 70mm.

So lets see both IMAX DMR and 5/70 releases for the hundreds of theatres with 70mmm projectors sitting used for 35mm only.

Love IMAX and love 5/70, but why make IMAX under perform and act like 5/70.

Film Distributors should have a think about there IMAX DMR releases vs 5/70 dts prints.
Do IMAX co-fund the DMR process to get more IMAX releases?

Darren

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 11-02-2004 06:32 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I really don't understand the DMR thing. It doesn't make sense to use 3 times the amount of 70mm needed to show a large format, digital uprezzing of a feature film. Many DMR movies have been in 2.39:1 aspect ratio, which makes it perfectly okay to use 5/70. You're not gaining much, if anything at all, doing 15/70 with that.

How much more expensive is it to make a 2 hour IMAX print versus a 2 hour 5/70 print? Many IMAX theaters already have 35mm projectors in the booth for showing feature films. How hard would it be to change out that projector in favor of a 35/70 capable unit?

It sounds like some major cost savings could be had through a 5/70 effort. With IMAX trying to dabble in digital stuff it doesn't sound to me like they are totally bent on everything being 15/70. Can't they just do some creative marketing to pump up the value of 5/70 shows?

 |  IP: Logged

Brian Michael Weidemann
Expert cat molester

Posts: 944
From: Costa Mesa, CA United States
Registered: Feb 2004


 - posted 11-03-2004 04:03 AM      Profile for Brian Michael Weidemann   Author's Homepage   Email Brian Michael Weidemann   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, IMAX doesn't do 5/70 (to my knowledge) and it's IMAX who wants to make the money here.

I haven't been able to make any direct 5/70 versus DMR 15/70 comparisons, though, and I'm sure a 5/70 presentation is quite remarkable! And I'm sure any exhibitor wouldn't necessarily be crazy if they picked the traditional 70mm over IMAX, especially when considering cost effectiveness.

But from IMAX's perspective, they'll have to downplay presentation to increase popularity of their product and name brand, increasing awareness. Only then, after they have awed many a non-believer, can they unleash their Master Plan upon the world! [Razz]

DMR isn't a revolution in motion picture technology so much as a tool for bigger and better things: revenue. Although, compared to 35mm, the presentation is [thumbsup] so I won't complain.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.