Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Large Format Forum   » 300 to be next DMR (Page 4)

 
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
Author Topic: 300 to be next DMR
Michael Coate
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1904
From: Los Angeles, California
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 03-20-2007 07:41 PM      Profile for Michael Coate   Email Michael Coate   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
And to think it only took 10 days to DMR the entire film. Boy has this technology really advanced!

Progress? [Roll Eyes]

In the timespan of ten days, you could blow-up a 35mm neg and strike, stripe and sound a few dozen 5-perf 70mm prints.

 |  IP: Logged

Caleb Johnstone-Cowan
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 593
From: London, UK
Registered: Mar 2006


 - posted 03-22-2007 02:52 PM      Profile for Caleb Johnstone-Cowan   Email Caleb Johnstone-Cowan   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
300 opened today here, I saw it in 35mm and the film is quite grainy. Does that look bad in IMAX? Does anyone know if this film was shot with DMR in mind. It was either on here or somewhere online that I read a guide of what shots not to do in large-format and there seemed to be an absence of these when perhaps they would have been suited to the film.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Perju
Film Handler

Posts: 90
From: Toronto, Canada
Registered: Nov 2002


 - posted 03-22-2007 04:35 PM      Profile for Mike Perju   Email Mike Perju   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hi Caleb,

The film was purposely grainy... it is based on a comic book.

In IMAX it looks great, a little too sharp though. The sharpness of the DMR takes way from the dreamy look it has on 35mm.

Camera related sharpness problems are in the last 1/2 hr, as the focus puller got a little sloppy.

 |  IP: Logged

Caleb Johnstone-Cowan
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 593
From: London, UK
Registered: Mar 2006


 - posted 03-22-2007 11:13 PM      Profile for Caleb Johnstone-Cowan   Email Caleb Johnstone-Cowan   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I would have bought the graphic novel if it wasn't around $25 here! Will wait until the paperback comes out.

Fair enough about the grain, although if you've seen any of Casshern you'll understand my reservations about grain as a visual effect. Casshern had the second most walkouts I've seen after the Aristocrats, and the latter only had idiots leaving our showings [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged

Patrick Watkinson
Film Handler

Posts: 19
From: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 03-28-2007 11:51 PM      Profile for Patrick Watkinson     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The films looks great in IMAX, however it is a shame it is scope/anamorphic. Also, the lower black band is quite large compared the top one. It is quite humorous to hear guest running out the theater saying “there’s something wrong with the picture…”
It’s even funnier to hear floor staff complain that it’s out of frame. My reply is: “Sorry, you are incorrect,: the film moves stage right to left, not top to bottom: try again…”
[Roll Eyes]

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Coate
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1904
From: Los Angeles, California
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 03-29-2007 12:53 AM      Profile for Michael Coate   Email Michael Coate   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Brian Michael Weidemann
This one was matted Scope as expected, but it's actually framed mid-screen, whereas most previous movies were matted lower in the frame.
quote: Patrick Watkinson
the lower black band is quite large compared the top one
Well, which is it?!

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Strube
Master Film Handler

Posts: 322
From: Milwaukee, WI, United States
Registered: Feb 2007


 - posted 03-29-2007 02:46 AM      Profile for Mark Strube   Author's Homepage   Email Mark Strube   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It was framed in the middle. Would've been nice if it was framed higher... a tall person's head was blocking a small area. [Wink]

 |  IP: Logged

Dick Vaughan
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1032
From: Bradford, West Yorkshire, UK
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 03-29-2007 06:35 PM      Profile for Dick Vaughan   Author's Homepage   Email Dick Vaughan   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Mmmmm?

Does the image position vary if it's a MPX or GT theatre? [Confused]

AS GT (and SR) are 1.43:1 and MPX is 1.75 (ish) :1 and they use the same print could it be the be the top / bottom margins are different depending on how the MPX is set up.??

Something I should have considered before .

 |  IP: Logged

Patrick Watkinson
Film Handler

Posts: 19
From: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 03-29-2007 09:36 PM      Profile for Patrick Watkinson     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It is the print itself. If you look at the actual frames on the print you will see the top band is not as large as the bottom. Now perhaps the mpx screen set up amplifies this? Regardless, when compared to the flat IMAX logo trailer and the flat Spiderman 3 trailer, the format is quite noticeable

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Coate
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1904
From: Los Angeles, California
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 04-02-2007 02:53 AM      Profile for Michael Coate   Email Michael Coate   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Boxofficemojo's take on the weekend's figures

quote:

'Blades' Takes Gold, 'Robinsons' Merits Silver
by Brandon Gray
April 1, 2007

Two broad comedies, Blades of Glory and Meet the Robinsons, skated to the top of the box office as last weekend's releases slipped. After four up weekends in a row, overall business was down eleven percent from the same time last year when Ice Age: The Meltdown opened to a spectacular $68 million.

Taking a comparable tack as Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby but with figure-skating instead of car racing, Blades of Glory landed an estimated $33 million on around 4,400 screens at 3,372 venues. In the vicinity of DodgeBall: A True Underdog Story's debut, the over $60 million picture starring Will Ferrell and Jon Heder scored the fourth highest-grossing start ever for a sports comedy and was the second-highest for Ferrell behind Talladega. Paramount Pictures distributed the DreamWorks and MTV Films co-production, which was also produced by Ben Stiller's Red Hour Films (Dodgeball).

In Blades of Glory, Ferrell reprised the over-the-top, boorish, wittily dim-witted type of character that served him well in Talladega Nights and Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy, his only post-Elf successes. Though Heder (Napoleon Dynamite) was promoted as the co-lead early in Blades' marketing campaign, television ads, posters and billboards leading up to the picture's release pushed Ferrell and excluded Heder. "You lead with your strongest hitter," said DreamWorks spokesman Marvin Levy, though he did not cede the Ferrell focus late in the game. Levy added that the audience was 53 percent under 25 years old and slightly female, according to the studio's preliminary exit polling, while moviegoer pollster CinemaScore's grade was "A-."

Meet the Robinsons launched at $25.1 million on 4,400 screens at 3,413 theaters, which included digital 3-D presentations on 587 screens at 484 locations. Though distributor Buena Vista didn't have a precise breakout, the 3-D presentations grossed twice as much on average as the regular version. The computer-animated comedy's debut was solid by the recently lowered standards of the genre, but it was significantly less than Chicken Little and Robots among similar movies.

"It's right on the expectation level [of $25 to $28 million]," said Chuck Viane, Buena Vista's president of distribution. "And of course we're playing into the Easter holiday which begins Monday and by Friday 80 percent of kids will be out of school." Buena Vista's polling indicated that the audience was 78 percent families and 53 percent female, while the CinemaScore was "A-."

Meet the Robinsons's manic ads sold the comedy, centering on gags involving a Tyrannosaurus Rex, singing frogs and a hyper lady with caffeine patches, but not the story, which could only be gleamed from the trailer.

Among holdovers, 300 was still in the fight, falling 44 percent to an estimated $11.2 million for $179.7 million in 24 days. Its IMAX runs accounted for $1.5 million of the weekend, down 29 percent, and $15 million of the total. March's other breakout hit, Wild Hogs, had its steepest drop yet, 39 percent, but nonetheless grossed an estimated $8.4 million. With $135.4 million in 31 days, it surpassed Bringing Down the House, which distributor Buena Vista had used as a model for its release.

Aside from Shooter, last weekend's slew of new releases plummeted in their second weekend. After being heralded as a franchise revival upon its No. 1 debut, TMNT devolved 62 percent to an estimated $9.2 million for $38.4 million in 10 days and, at its current trajectory, will likely be the least-attended of the four Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles movies.

Particularly alarming was The Last Mimzy, the New Line Cinema family picture that was depending on word-of-mouth for long-term playability. It slid 60 percent to an estimated $4 million for a mere $16.2 million in 10 days. The Hills Have Eyes 2 dove 59 percent to an estimated $3.9 million, when its predecessor was down 49 percent in its second weekend with twice the gross. Two dramas, Reign Over Me and Pride, evaporated as well.

Shooter had a typical drop of 45 percent to an estimated $8 million. The $60 million-plus action picture's 10-day total stands at a flabby $27.2 million.

The weekend saw a marketing experiment from Universal Pictures. The studio re-issued Peaceful Warrior, a drama that made a meager $1.1 million last summer under Lionsgate's tutelage. To build word-of-mouth, Universal offered $15 million worth of tickets through retailer Best Buy that people could redeem for free at 615 theaters on this weekend only, and another $2 million was spent on prints and advertising. According to Universal, about 250,000 tickets were redeemed and the movie generated the equivalent of $2.1 million, 11 percent of which came from paying moviegoers. The unconventional release means the picture will not be listed on the box office charts, though it will continue for paying audiences through the week.

Also opening, The Lookout limped to an estimated $2 million at 955 sites, which ranks near the bottom among heist pictures.

Who's good at math?

Question #1: "15" (the gross of the IMAX engagements) is what percentage of "180" (the film's total gross)?

Question #2: "62" (the number of IMAX engagements) is what percentage of "3280" (total number of engagements at widest point of release)?

In order to believe that the IMAX presentations were preferred by moviegoers, then the answer to question #1 should be a higher percentage than the answer to question #2. (This assumes, of course, that I've properly set up the questions.)

 |  IP: Logged

Dustin Mitchell
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1865
From: Mondovi, WI, USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 04-02-2007 03:07 AM      Profile for Dustin Mitchell   Email Dustin Mitchell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The Imax presentations grossed 8.33% of the total gross.

The Imax playdates accounted for 1.89% of the total playdates at widest release.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.