Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Large Format Forum   » Titanic - the IMAX 3D experience - April 2012 (Page 5)

 
This topic comprises 6 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6 
 
Author Topic: Titanic - the IMAX 3D experience - April 2012
Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 04-01-2012 10:17 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Pablo O'Hana
Cheers guys, nice welcoming to the forum from you all.
Welcome to the forum! If you have hung around here at all, you should know that this place will give you plenty of constructive criticism, if you deserve it. For example, your site has this sentence:
quote:
The screen is a stretched vinyl painted silver to stop any reflection from the projector.
That's completely false. The only reason you can even SEE the picture is due to its reflection. If it didn't reflect you'd just be looking at a black hole.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 04-02-2012 02:16 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Tim Asten
The four disc Special Edition dvd of Titanic has the film spread over two discs. The intermission can be seen here.
Geez, you think they could have had enough classly showmanship to put up an "Intermission" frame instead of that inane "Insert Disc 2." What do they think, that everyone will sit there in the living room thinking the film was over, or that they will just sit there hitting the remote to get the player to skip to the next "chapter"?

 |  IP: Logged

Manny Knowles
"What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???"

Posts: 4247
From: Bloomington, IN, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 04-03-2012 08:11 AM      Profile for Manny Knowles   Email Manny Knowles   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If that's a website for an IMAX theatre, I'm surprised IMAX will allow that website to include the use of the term "LieMAX" and the other digital-bashing commentary.

 |  IP: Logged

Jonathan Goeldner
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1360
From: Washington, District of Columbia
Registered: Jun 2008


 - posted 04-05-2012 05:24 PM      Profile for Jonathan Goeldner   Email Jonathan Goeldner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
the IMAX-Digital presentation I saw at Tysons Corner featured it almost full frame, but with black borders on the sides of the image - is this 1.66 then??

are the REAL-D presentations in it's OAR of 2.35?

oh and the post-conversion 3D job - top notch! one word: amazing

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 04-05-2012 06:09 PM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yeppers .. all in nice 2.39:1 presentations.

If one can catch the XtraBrite (6fL) version, it's worth it.

 |  IP: Logged

Jonathan Goeldner
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1360
From: Washington, District of Columbia
Registered: Jun 2008


 - posted 04-05-2012 08:59 PM      Profile for Jonathan Goeldner   Email Jonathan Goeldner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
^ that's what I'm worried about, my neighborhood theater offers side masking (which is ideal for 2.39 films, but the light output of the Sony DP is set way too low for my taste ('How To Train Your Dragon' opening sequence was so dark it rendered the 3D let alone the visual coherence of the scene totally lacking)

 |  IP: Logged

Jonathan Goeldner
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1360
From: Washington, District of Columbia
Registered: Jun 2008


 - posted 04-07-2012 10:11 PM      Profile for Jonathan Goeldner   Email Jonathan Goeldner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
come on, a penny for someone's thoughts

 |  IP: Logged

Blaine Young
Master Film Handler

Posts: 477
From: Kirkland, WA, USA
Registered: Sep 2006


 - posted 04-17-2012 05:04 PM      Profile for Blaine Young   Email Blaine Young   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Pacific Science Center in Seattle is running it in Digital. They were told that the 15/70 prints were 94 reels. They simply didn't want to bother with it.

 |  IP: Logged

Kurt Zupin
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 989
From: Maricopa, Arizona
Registered: Oct 2004


 - posted 04-18-2012 02:45 AM      Profile for Kurt Zupin   Email Kurt Zupin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The Pacific had no choice, if they wanted to run it they were going to have to run it in Digital. They didn't get to choose if it was 15/70 or Digital. IMAX only struck 5 prints of Titanic in 15/70 and those went to LA, NY, Detroit, London and Sydney.

 |  IP: Logged

Joseph L. Kleiman
Master Film Handler

Posts: 380
From: Sacramento, CA
Registered: Apr 2005


 - posted 04-18-2012 03:06 PM      Profile for Joseph L. Kleiman   Email Joseph L. Kleiman   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I wish it was showing in 15/70 in Detroit. I really do. Unfortunately, that IMAX theater was mothballed last September.

But it is showing in Dearborn at the Henry Ford, one of the highest grossing IMAX theaters in the country and one of the locations where the Titanic artifact exhibition is currently showing. I have a feeling that Ron, being the Titanic fanatic he is, threatened to close down the theater if he didn't get the film. [Wink]

I'm sure there will be a long shelf life for the film prints in second-run status on the museum circuit.

 |  IP: Logged

Victor Liorentas
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 800
From: london ontario canada
Registered: May 2009


 - posted 04-18-2012 03:09 PM      Profile for Victor Liorentas   Email Victor Liorentas   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I plan to go to Dearborn this Saturday! They are also showing Titanica!

 |  IP: Logged

Jonathan Goeldner
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1360
From: Washington, District of Columbia
Registered: Jun 2008


 - posted 04-19-2012 04:15 PM      Profile for Jonathan Goeldner   Email Jonathan Goeldner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Kurt Zupin
The Pacific had no choice, if they wanted to run it they were going to have to run it in Digital. They didn't get to choose if it was 15/70 or Digital. IMAX only struck 5 prints of Titanic in 15/70 and those went to LA, NY, Detroit, London and Sydney.
where in NY is this playing in 15/70?

Detroit? how odd.

 |  IP: Logged

Edward Havens
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 614
From: Los Angeles, CA
Registered: Mar 2008


 - posted 04-19-2012 04:22 PM      Profile for Edward Havens   Email Edward Havens   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I found it odd that our IMAX digital print of Titanic has small black bars on the left and right sides of the screen, even though it does not appear they are using floating windows. But it's pretty clear how versatile Super 35 was for Cameron in 1997 that he do both traditional widescreen and IMAX fifteen years later from the same negative.

 |  IP: Logged

Jim Henk
Master Film Handler

Posts: 364
From: San Diego, CA
Registered: Feb 2006


 - posted 04-20-2012 01:24 AM      Profile for Jim Henk   Email Jim Henk   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
And where in LA? Thanks!

 |  IP: Logged

Allan Young
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 125
From: EGHAM, Surrey UK
Registered: Jun 2011


 - posted 04-20-2012 02:15 AM      Profile for Allan Young   Email Allan Young   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
NY - AMC Lincoln Square
LA - Universal Citywalk

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 6 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.