Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Digital Cinema Forum   » HD projection: What say the pro's about the Barco DP30 (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: HD projection: What say the pro's about the Barco DP30
Tom Sauter
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 163
From: Buffalo, NY, USA
Registered: Sep 2000


 - posted 05-06-2003 11:13 AM      Profile for Tom Sauter   Author's Homepage   Email Tom Sauter   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Geoffrey,

Its not just a matter of storing the information and sending it to the projector as data. In order to download from Boeing there are hardware security features as well as software ones (not to mention the hardware and software security features for projection) The ICE system is not entirely "off the shelf" components.

The ACSAR restriction I mentioned may be limited to those theatres whose DP's are still owned by Boeing/Barco on a trial basis.

 |  IP: Logged

Geoffrey Gilbert
Film Handler

Posts: 9
From: Austin, TX, USA
Registered: May 2003


 - posted 05-06-2003 11:41 AM      Profile for Geoffrey Gilbert   Email Geoffrey Gilbert   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I know. I traded emails with Cuban and some of his folks at HDNet, and that's how I got directed to Boeing. I would get accounts/license agreements from these guys, and permissions to receive and transmit. I know I am simplifying here, but isn't the process that a 2 terabyte film digitized through a telecine in LA, can be stored uncompressed, encrypted, and sent through large packet transmission over Boeing satellites, received and unencrpted from Boeing again to ensure security and then have a finite broadcast capability...like say 40 viewings before it expires, and you reformat the drive and do it all over again.

I know I am only slightly dangerous, but I'll read anything you all put in front of me. I need that satellite infrastructure to go with my digital dailies project, so that sunk cost is part of the business plan...it just generates revenue from more than one enterprise...which is good IMO.

thanks for the discourse

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 05-06-2003 11:51 AM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Has anyone actually made money with an HD / Digital Cinema projector? Perhaps some production or post-production centers but I would like to hear of anyone involved in theatrical exhibition who has actually made money on it. For theatres I would define that as an increase in profit (net boxoffice after film rentals) over what they would have likely gotten with film exhibition less the lease on the HD projector or depreciation over the period involved. Those who were lent a projector would have to estimate how much it would have cost under normal circumstances. I don't doubt that some have done increased business with Episode 2 or other films but enough to pay for these (which will all be obsolete as soon as the 2K units hit the market)? I rather doubt it.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 05-06-2003 02:55 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
At the presentation of the Kodak Digital Cinema System prototype at ShoWest 2002, Kodak noted the average distribution cost to provide a new 35mm print to a theatre was about $350 US per week. Shown five times per day, that's only about $10 per show for the "software" that runs through a film projector.

Mastering and delivering large data files (be it by satellite, fiber, or optical media) is NOT free, and the amortization and maintenance of the hardware (receiver, server, network, projector) must be added onto that.

 |  IP: Logged

Jack Ondracek
Film God

Posts: 2348
From: Port Orchard, WA, USA
Registered: Oct 2002


 - posted 05-06-2003 04:46 PM      Profile for Jack Ondracek   Author's Homepage   Email Jack Ondracek   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Has anyone actually made money with an HD / Digital Cinema projector?
Maybe the Seattle people who frequent the Cinerama could comment. My (relatively uninformed) impression is that their digital system hasn't seen a lot of use since Star Wars.

 |  IP: Logged

David Kilderry
Master Film Handler

Posts: 355
From: Melbourne Australia
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 05-06-2003 08:42 PM      Profile for David Kilderry   Author's Homepage   Email David Kilderry   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Gilbert, Jack is on the money with his comments. Most of us live in market economies, where the market drives the demand for a product or service - there is no demand from the average moviegoer in 2003 for digital projection. It is not better, it is not cheaper, it is not more convenient.

No cinema owner worth his salt will swap reliable, cost effective, high performance film projection technology for digital in 2003. They certainly won't give a % of the ticket away.

David Kilderry

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 05-06-2003 08:46 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Having installed 3 Barco DP50s on an outright purchase...I can tell you that with the ACSAR you can run whatever you choose...as to anyone not letting you use the ACSAR that may be more of who owns the projector.

Be forwarned...the video world is not a nice and safe place...Much like we have different film formats, so does video and much like we have our different aspect ratios, so does video.

But it isn't that easy...1.85:1 isn't 1.85:1 for everybody.

You have your 4:3 families and with 4:3 you have those that were formated 16:9 within 4:3 and those with 1.85 within 4:3 and 2.39 within 4:3 and depending on the amount of over/under scan the guy at the transfer house did, you will or won't have to tweek your projector on a title-by-title basis.

Then you have your 16:9 families...and 4:3 within 16:9 and 1.85 within 16:9 and 2.39 within 16:9 and the same rules apply as above.

Think you are done? Guess again... most of these DMD panels are 5:4 actually which is great for power point shows (and you will want to handle them) but it must be interpolated for all of the others so you really 4:3 within a 5:4 and then all of the various permutations listed above...likewise for the 16:9 stuff.

Think your done? nope. So you don't want to letterbox your shows so there will be some scaling going on ...on a format by format basis. But does your theatre use top only masking? Is your projector off-center? Guess what you have yet more tweeking that will need to be done on a title-by-title basis.

If I make it sound like it isn't easy...it ISN'T. You can get wonderful results but it isn't a set and forget unless you limit yourself to just a couple potential formats...easy to do with DCinema...there are only something like 4 permutations now...but with professional video (and consumer cuz face it you know a DVD player will be too good to pass up) you will dozens of formats to contend with.

The ACSAR is nothing more than a switcher/scaler that will take what you send it and make it so it will play on the projector. That is, if you have a 4:3 component video source, with the approripate input module you can select that module, tell the ACSAR that it is a 4:3 signal and it will duitifully scale it up to SXGA resolution and hand it off to the projector. It is the projector that must take that signal and "massage" it so it looks finished on the screen.

Now if you don't care about dressing out the image the way you would with film then it is easier since you wouldn't have to worry about masking it properly and hiding the keystone. Then again...it will just look like a TV show then.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 05-09-2003 09:47 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
So much for those D-Cinema evangelists who dangle the carrot of the "projectionist-less booth" in front of exhibitors. It leads one to ponder how the popcorn popper/projectionists, who can barely thread in frame, are going to deal with 15 different video format possibilities.

I, for one, look forward to going to the "movies" for a first run opening night, only to sit back and watch an uncorrected anamorphic film with squished actors -- or visa-versa. [evil]

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.