|
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Would you invest in 35mm today?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 10-03-2005 10:29 AM
quote: It's lonely sometimes trying to separate the good from the B.S. in the projection TV debate.
Not really Lou....just remember, anytime you hear someone say that the "rollout" is going to happen in a "big way" or that digital will replace film in the next 2 to 5 years, just stamp ASSHOLE on their foreheads and walk away. OK, if you find that socially unacceptable, then just ask them "And that statement is based on WHAT, fool? What FACTS that you know that no one else is privy to?" I am so sick of hearing this crap being thrown around as if it has come from some industry study that takes into account ALL the variables, of which there are many, some that have not even surfaced as yet.
These same people were saying that the "big rollout" was just around the corner almost a decade ago. Well, if less that 100 screens in 8 years is a "big rollout," then yea, maybe they were right. But given the nearly 25 years it took for that "rollout" of the $700 red readers, I think you can bet that exhibitors will not swallow hype when they take a look at the bill for the change to digital -- the REAL bill, not just the cost of installation, but of maintenance and energy consumption. They will be looking at the hype with the skepticism of a guy having to actually open his wallet for this change. Even if some sort of a co-op deal is arranged, it still all comes down to a change that is, at its heart, so studios can save print costs. Then to rub salt in the wound, it passes the extra, substantial energy costs on to the exhibitor who gets NOTHING in return for it on a day in and day out operation. I think it is safe to say that if anything is certain, it is that the exhibitor is not wanton with his money. He is savvy enough to want to completely understand the long-term financial impact of running digital as opposed to film before he plunks down one red cent. He's not going to increase his operation overhead just so patrons see a steadier picture (you think he would ever give a refund because a patron came out and said, "I want my money back because that image in Cinema 3 has an unsteady picture" or "I saw some scratches in the image, I couldn't enjoy it?" If he gave a damn about that, he would be spending more money in the booth NOW.
Past a certain point, and it isn't much past -- is there a picture on the screen? is there sound in the theatre? -- he isn't too terribly concerned about more nuances than that. So what makes any rational person think all of a sudden he's going to say, "Oh sure, I will gladly take on the on-going, substantial economic burden of running digital, just so the studio can save the cost of prints and I can get a rock steady image on the screen? I just don't see exhibitors gleefully switching to ANY technology without first making sure it is going to benefit their bottom line. Studios may have power to dictate lots of things, but they can't make an exhibitor incur an expenditure that gives him no return on his dollar. Picture steadiness, pristine even after the 1000th screening, environmental issues -- they all can be damned if it's going to cost him more money to operate. It changes nothing for him -- he gets the same number of seats sold -- with everything for the studio. Yah, he just can't WAIT to buy into that!
And if he somehow comes down with dementia and DOES replace all his 35mm equipment for video projectors, woe is the movie goer. How many screens will have dull, underlite images because he has always looked for ways to scrip on anything booth related; he'll be hot to offset the additional electrical cost by "saving" on electricity when he finds bills 30% higher in an economy where energy prices continue to rise. How many screens will have blemishes all over them because of the thousands of little nano-mirrors that have died, yet Mr. Exhibitor sees no reason to replace the DLP module, mostly because it COSTS GOBS OF MONEY.
Some tell me how this is good for the exhibitor. As for the studios trying to force this down the exhibitor's throat....it won't be the first time an exhibitor will shut a theatre down rather than run it at a loss. Studios are not going to make that coveted 50 million in opening weekend if all they've got are a few hundred digital screens to play it on.
Then again, the way around this for the studios would be to just buy their own theatres and install whatever the hell they want in them. When they see the price tag for digital that THEY have to pay for, their bean counters may be screaming at them to look for nice, refurbished 35mm projectors instead!
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted 10-05-2005 08:19 AM
FWIW, sales volumes of 35mm and 70mm print film continue to GROW. Worldwide, well over 10 BILLION feet are used annually, on over 100,000 theatre screens showing FILM. Answering the topic question "Would you invest in 35mm today?", Kodak continues to invest millions of dollars in motion picture film R&D, including print film.
Whether it's film or digital, Kodak provides the best of both worlds:
http://www.kodak.com/go/dcinema
quote: Kodak Digital Cinema: NETWORK-BASED SOLUTION BUILT ON LINUX PLATFORM WITH ALL SYSTEMS AND SERVICES: Fully compliant with today's and will be compliant with tomorrow's evolving interoperability standards of DCI and SMPTE. Supporting a choice of projectors up to 2K resolution today, with upgrade to 4K tomorrow. Driven by unique KODAK Software and supported by KODAK Service worldwide
http://www.laserpacific.com/our_company.html
quote: Kodak LaserPacific now plays an integral part in the motion picture process from the beginning of photography in dailies digital preview, digital intermediate, all the way to the home video delivery elements, as well as through delivery directly to cinemas in collaboration with Kodak Digital Cinema. LaserPacific has gathered the technology, expert staff and operational acumen to change the landscape once again. Utilizing a deep understanding of the post production process and drawing upon Kodaks unparalleled expertise in image science, LaserPacific continues to enable the creative community with powerful new digital tools to help tell the stories the whole world watches.
[ 10-05-2005, 09:44 AM: Message edited by: John Pytlak ]
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|