Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Digital Cinema Forum   » Christie CDXL-30 and -20 lamp issue, anyone else? (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Christie CDXL-30 and -20 lamp issue, anyone else?
David Zylstra
Master Film Handler

Posts: 432
From: Novi, MI, USA
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 07-04-2008 02:46 PM      Profile for David Zylstra   Email David Zylstra   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Theoretically it could - although the CDXL-20's cathode end is the same size as a CXL-30 so beyond the anode cable that is the only question on fit (maybe the -25SC is already the same size).

The warranty on the CDXL-20 is the same as CXL-20 - 1200hrs full and 2400hrs pro-rated.

Cost differential from CXL-20 to CDXL-20 is at least 50% higher, but the differential between CXL-30 and CDXL-20 is almost a wash (but then factor in the higher warranty and you come out way ahead).

Christie is touting a "CDXL lamp down program" on their website.

So far I am not completely convinced the CDXL-20 would outperform a CXL-30 in terms of light output over the life of the lamp.

Not sure on the current -25SC lamp life though since we don't use those.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 07-04-2008 05:10 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Monte,

If there is an equivalent CDXL-20 for the CXL-20SC (not the R)...it would be called the CXL-20SCH. I don't know if it in fact exists.

The CXL-20SC, CXL-25SC and CXL-30SC all use the same cathode pin and should be physically exchangable.

I would look into your exhaust and ensure you are pulling out enough. Most people try to avoid the 2500-watt lamps as they are normally too big a lamp for their package size. They are notiorus for not being the best in the long life department.

Another solution for you Monte is to use CXL-30SCs and only operate them like 2500s. The cost is pretty close (less than $100 difference) and the life expectancy is the same...just the 3K is a little bigger to dissapate the heat. That is, you are likely to get longer life out of the 3K running like a 2500.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 07-04-2008 05:31 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Steve Guttag
If there is an equivalent CDXL-20 for the CXL-20SC (not the R)...it would be called the CXL-20SCH. I don't know if it in fact exists.

There is a lamp along this line for the M projector. It obviously won't be available till the M projector is available around the end of this month.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 07-04-2008 10:18 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Christie is going to use a non "HTP" style lamp in their projector? No way.

The "H" in the name that I listed denotes the CDXL lamp (high-output) but in a more traditional package as used by NON Christie lamphouses. So, CXL-20SCH would look like a CDXL-20 in the envelope area but would look identical to the CXL-20SC at the stems.

Again, I don't know if they have a CXL-20SCH but if they do, that would be the letters they would use based on my other lamp testing.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 07-05-2008 09:34 AM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Steve,

Its a short 2kw lamp and pretty small overall, I have not seen the ends of the lamp yet. Christie has been working with a no compromise attitude with Digital projectors so nothing would surprise me. There are even a number of very valid reasons for them still using the 1.2" dmd's in the 2000 and ZX although the M will use the .98" dmd's.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.