Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Digital Cinema Forum   » Dolby Show Store RAID degradation (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Dolby Show Store RAID degradation
Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 07-12-2009 10:29 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Uh....not the near future...the future is HERE! The drives for it, though also 500GB are less expensive too.

Dolby DSS200

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 07-12-2009 01:25 PM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Terrence Meiczinger
Seagate Barracuda ES.2 ST3500320NS
That's an "enterprise-class" drive made for 24/7 operation in servers and such. It has a 5 year warranty and the MTBF is 1.2 million hours. I've installed bunches of them at work, in both desktops and servers. Have had numerous failures. Look up that item on newegg.com and read the user comments. That specific drive model has a history of very high failure rate. Only Seagate knows why. I switched to the Western Digital equivalent model, haven't had one fail yet that I can recall.

OEM ST3500320NS at newegg.com has a 5 year warranty through Seagate. Read those user comments though. [Eek!]

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 07-12-2009 01:50 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
I didn't realize those OEM drives had a 5 year warranty. They certainly don't anymore though, as Seagate changed their warranty policy for all OEM drives down to 3 years.

Regardless, Dolby should be using something more reliable, such as the Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 series. I've had plenty of WD failures and Maxtor drives are absolutely awful. At the end of the day, Dolby probably purchased 50 thousand of them to get some magnificent price and now have a warehouse full of them. Only Dolby knows though.

 |  IP: Logged

Jeremy Weigel
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1062
From: Edmond, OK, USA
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 07-13-2009 01:02 AM      Profile for Jeremy Weigel   Email Jeremy Weigel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If memory serves, Seagate bought Maxtor a couple of years ago, which might explain Seagate's current higher than normal failure rate given that Maxtor's drive as Brad has mentioned were/are terrible.

 |  IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 07-13-2009 10:01 AM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I dunno, not trying to start anything, but I found this Seagate Technology OEM Limited Warranty Statement

quote:
For Product sold to a Seagate OEM customer (“OEM”), the standard warranty period is three (3) years for Notebook and Desktop drives and five (5) years for Enterprise and Nearline drives.
The drive Dolby is using is definitely Enterprise/Nearline.

Of course Dolby, as the system integrator, can warrant the drives for whatever period it wants.

 |  IP: Logged

Dennis M Dow Jr
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 141
From: Bloomfield NJ USA
Registered: Oct 2003


 - posted 07-13-2009 03:34 PM      Profile for Dennis M Dow Jr   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have been using WD drives for as long as I can remember never had a problem. Did have issues with Maxtor in any computer that I had to build with it. Seagate used in my very first build way back when and it served me well for the time I had it. Just feel more comfortable with the WD Caviar drives

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 07-13-2009 07:00 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
IMHO they blew it big time by not going to RAID 6. Not only is it far more redundant but it doesn't cost all that much more over the RAID 5 cost.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 07-21-2009 06:32 PM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Heh, I had another of these drives fail today, RAID-10 array in a server, server being backed up at the time the drive croaked. [uhoh] Replaced drive with shelf spare. Costs $19.99 to get an advanced warranty replacement for the bad drive directly from Seagate, has already shipped.

 |  IP: Logged

Eric Robinson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 538
From: Santa Rosa, CA
Registered: Jan 2005


 - posted 08-28-2009 10:45 AM      Profile for Eric Robinson   Email Eric Robinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
My failed drive from a Dolby Show Store is:
Seagate ST3400620NS 400GB
When I removed the drive I heard something inside of it go "Clunk" After a little "shake test" I concluded that something inside the drive is very loose, you can hear the disks flopping around inside. Its hard to resist my natural impulse to take it apart, but I have to send it back for warranty replacement.

The show store is 2 months old.

 |  IP: Logged

Andy Bajew
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 136
From: Bellaire, Texas
Registered: Jun 2009


 - posted 08-28-2009 12:33 PM      Profile for Andy Bajew   Email Andy Bajew   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Stu Jamieson
So what's the rationale behind not rebooting RAID drives? Why does this make them more prone to failure?
When you constantly shut down any type of computer system, you are putting extreme thermal stress on all of the components from heating and cooling.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-28-2009 01:54 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
You can still re-boot most computer and servers running a RAID by doing a hot re-boot instead of a cold reboot in which the power is removed to re-boot. I always felt the Dolby RAID card is way way way too busy all the time... even at idle its alot more active than most RAID arrays I've worked with and I believe this contributes to the HD failures. Other manufacturers servers don't have nearly as active of RAID and rarely seem to loose drives. The 2 Dell 2850 servers I run at home each have 6 148 gig SCSI type drives in them that are older than Digital Cinema is! And they have never failed... they are always running though and on UPS in case of power bump.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Demetris Thoupis
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1240
From: Aradippou, Larnaca, Cyprus
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 08-29-2009 10:17 AM      Profile for Demetris Thoupis   Email Demetris Thoupis   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Aren't drives supposed to be horizontaly mounted!? When I was doing PC services I attended a seminar and someone was mentioning that the drives are supposed to be horizontal mounted and not vertical as they are prone to more failures.

 |  IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 08-29-2009 10:32 AM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
"Modern" drives are designed to be mounted in any horizontal or vertical plane, including upside down.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.