Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Digital Cinema Forum   » Complaining Cinema Owners... (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Complaining Cinema Owners...
Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 07-29-2011 09:20 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Much of the stuff from Sony is released on 4K. Warners and Paramout also release it from time to time. True Grit was the last big one that comes to mind and was Dream Works. As 3-D fades out somewhat 4K 2-D will become more common as there are quite a few of these projectors going in.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Jentsch
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1061
From: New Berlin, WI, USA
Registered: Apr 2003


 - posted 08-01-2011 04:12 PM      Profile for Scott Jentsch   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Jentsch   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Resolution is just one measure of quality, so if there are other benefits to the new 4K systems over the 2K systems, such as brightness, contrast, and other aspects of picture quality, those should definitely be considered when making such an investment.

If going to 4K is an increment of cost that is justified by those other aspects, why not? And who knows, maybe the studios will catch on to 4K when they get tired of tooting the 3D horn...

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-01-2011 09:54 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
At least with NEC once you are at the NC3200 to go to the 4K 3240 is about 7 grand more give or take. So it would seem foolish for anyone buying an NC3200 not to spend the extra cash for the one that has more future possibility.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

John Gavin
Film Handler

Posts: 12
From: Machida, Tokyo, Japan
Registered: Nov 2010


 - posted 08-02-2011 02:44 AM      Profile for John Gavin   Email John Gavin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
One of the issues for 4K is the 250Mb/s bit rate. 4 times the
image size and the same max bit rate. Same compression. For a
really detailed image, the 2K image could very possibly be of
better quality.

I suspect any perceived improvement in image quality is a result
of improved projector technologies as much as the resolution
itself.

 |  IP: Logged

Carsten Kurz
Film God

Posts: 4340
From: Cologne, NRW, Germany
Registered: Aug 2009


 - posted 08-02-2011 09:19 PM      Profile for Carsten Kurz   Email Carsten Kurz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
J2k excels at higher signal frequencies, so, 4k at the same bitrate as 2k is not as bad as it may sound. Given the fact that most movies to date do not nearly max out the DCI spec, I wouldn't care about the current limits too much.
To me it seems J2k was an excellent choice. You could complain about all possible aspects of DCI projection, but visible codec artifacts?

- Carsten

 |  IP: Logged

Brian Guckian
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 594
From: Dublin, Ireland
Registered: Apr 2003


 - posted 08-03-2011 10:26 AM      Profile for Brian Guckian   Email Brian Guckian   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mark Gulbrandsen
At least with NEC once you are at the NC3200 to go to the 4K 3240 is about 7 grand more give or take. So it would seem foolish for anyone buying an NC3200 not to spend the extra cash for the one that has more future possibility.
Just wondering, Mark - what would the additional lens cost be, if one accepts that a lens with a better MTF is a good idea?

What is the price differential between say, the two Barco lens ranges that Carsten mentioned earlier, or say, higher-contrast lenses compatible with NEC projectors?

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-03-2011 12:23 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Personally, I didn't have too much to complain about with the standard lensing. The image is fantastic with it. Probably as good as one would get from a Zoom lens with more than a dozen elements in it. As to the difference in lens pricing, I honestly don't know, you'd have to call them or your local dealer and ask. I also don't know if the actual lens used in the studio series has a higher MTF then a standard one does but by simply adding an aperature in the lens it can have that effect as well as increase the apparent contrast range. Personally, I am hoping that Schneider comes out with some lensing for the 4K format and they would probably be primes. The nice thing about the NC-3200 and 3240 is the lens mount that is attached to the lens makes switching lenses very easy. Schneider have a few D-Cinema lenses now but not very many.
Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Brian Guckian
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 594
From: Dublin, Ireland
Registered: Apr 2003


 - posted 08-03-2011 03:39 PM      Profile for Brian Guckian   Email Brian Guckian   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Many thanks, some Primes would sure be nice!

Good point re. apertures; although now that I think of it I seem to recall a point made before that the gap between the DMD micromirrors is larger with 4K DLP so perhaps one needs to be careful not to bring about a re-emergence of e.g. the screen door problem through being over-zealous with resolution and contrast.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-03-2011 04:21 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The gap actually has to be much smaller as the chip is only .18" larger diagonally than the 1.2" chips are.

 |  IP: Logged

Brian Guckian
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 594
From: Dublin, Ireland
Registered: Apr 2003


 - posted 08-04-2011 07:08 AM      Profile for Brian Guckian   Email Brian Guckian   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Many thanks indeed Mark, I'll go back and see how I got that wrong.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-04-2011 02:19 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
@ Louis....

No, there have been at least a half dozen per year since Sony released their first 4K projector. A few other studios also release 4K DCP on their big titles. In addition some 70mm classics have been scanned at 8K resolution and are also available to show in 4K. 4K has kinda been put on the back burner because of 3-Dee but now that that is loosing strength and people like Jimmy Cameron are pushing higher quality we will probably see more 4K content per year in the comming years.

Of course "back in the filum days" we didn't see but an occasional 70mm title either... and just on big shows. In these digital days 4K would equate to there being a 70nmm release. Best part is you don't have to switch the gate,trap and lens to do it! Give 4K projection a chance... it's only been available in quantity since right after Cinema Con!

Mark

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.