Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Digital Cinema Forum   » Is digital IMAX 2K – or a bit more? (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Is digital IMAX 2K – or a bit more?
Carsten Kurz
Film God

Posts: 4340
From: Cologne, NRW, Germany
Registered: Aug 2009


 - posted 12-09-2012 02:18 PM      Profile for Carsten Kurz   Email Carsten Kurz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Two 2k images overlapping will not give 4k resolution. The pixelshape and size will still be 2k, even with more or less overlapping. So, yes, on a large screen, I consider it perfectly normal to see jaggies from a center position.

When IMAX laid this out, 4k DLP was not available. I heard IMAX was recently throwing out the original Christie CP2000 machines to be subsequently replaced by BARCOs. However, I have not seen any indication wether they now use 4k Barcos. Of course, 4k for digital IMAX should be a no brainer, but who knows...

- Carsten

 |  IP: Logged

Marco Giustini
Film God

Posts: 2713
From: Reading, UK
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 12-09-2012 02:20 PM      Profile for Marco Giustini   Email Marco Giustini   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I am so disappointed, the picture was "digital", NO detail was visible, only bunches of pixels. I really don't get how someone at IMAX looked at the first setup and said "Yes, this is amazing, it looks as good as the 15/70, let's go for it".
Mine was a proper IMAX screen, with the 70mm projector still sitting there.

 |  IP: Logged

Jonathan Goeldner
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1360
From: Washington, District of Columbia
Registered: Jun 2008


 - posted 12-09-2012 09:11 PM      Profile for Jonathan Goeldner   Email Jonathan Goeldner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
@ Carsten: I though the Barco changeover WAS for the reason of the laser projection upgrade.

 |  IP: Logged

Andrew Thomas
Master Film Handler

Posts: 273
From: Pearland, TX, USA
Registered: Jun 2012


 - posted 12-09-2012 10:54 PM      Profile for Andrew Thomas   Email Andrew Thomas   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Other than the screen size being so large, I've never been impressed by 15/70 IMAX. I would rather have that resolution on a much smaller screen. Digital IMAX screens I've seen are about the right size, but the 2K resolution is far too low.

 |  IP: Logged

Marco Giustini
Film God

Posts: 2713
From: Reading, UK
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 12-10-2012 04:09 AM      Profile for Marco Giustini   Email Marco Giustini   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Then they simply cannot charge customers to see a pixellated image, that's it.

The only 15/70 Imax I've seen was waaay better.

I give up with Imax. The sound was ok and loud, but it's absolutely not worth £17, which are $27!

 |  IP: Logged

Carsten Kurz
Film God

Posts: 4340
From: Cologne, NRW, Germany
Registered: Aug 2009


 - posted 12-10-2012 05:56 AM      Profile for Carsten Kurz   Email Carsten Kurz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
@ Carsten: I though the Barco changeover WAS for the reason of the laser projection upgrade.
I don't know if they have signed anything regarding laser retrofit systems. To my knowledge, the laser retrofit systems are only intended to equip the remaining 15/70 sites with very large screens.

Barco has only demonstrated that retrofit system, as all other manufacturers incl. Sony have.

Why they decided to go with Barco instead of Christie, I don't know. Maybe it's just because Barco has the brightest xenon DLP projector confirmed. And maybe Barco could promise the earliest availability for their laser retrofit engine.

- Carsten

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Strube
Master Film Handler

Posts: 322
From: Milwaukee, WI, United States
Registered: Feb 2007


 - posted 12-10-2012 08:23 PM      Profile for Mark Strube   Author's Homepage   Email Mark Strube   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Carsten Kurz
Why they decided to go with Barco instead of Christie, I don't know.
Price.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.