Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Digital Cinema Forum   » GDC 8.01 update (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: GDC 8.01 update
Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 11-09-2012 04:02 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It shouldn't be firmware dependent though it should be able to handle Cinelink TLS (DH is no longer an option).

The Current NC-1600 firmware is 2.14 and the current TI software is 15.1 BUT if you don't have a GORE board, then you will likely be on 14.0.

 |  IP: Logged

Steven J Hart
Master Film Handler

Posts: 282
From: WALES, ND, USA
Registered: Mar 2004


 - posted 02-26-2013 07:52 AM      Profile for Steven J Hart   Author's Homepage   Email Steven J Hart   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Steve Guttag
If you are not on a VPF program...I would STAY AWAY from 8.01 until it becomes completely stable. 7.83 is the last of the non-DCI versions and may be worth updating. I don't recall having any real issues with it. 7.8x adds things like the remote shell to it so one can go in via SSH to pull logs, reboot, update...etc. so from a support standpoint...it was a big help.
Is it time to upgrade my GDC server to 8.01 build 99? Is there any pressing reason to do this? i.e., not being able to play encrypted DCP's?

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 02-26-2013 09:16 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Actually, 8.01 is up to build 103

I maintain, if you don't have any pressing need, I would stay on 7.83.

Problems on 8.01 have dramatically stabilized, however. I had one customer with issues on 8.01build99v2...gave strange security errors on several units...updating to build 103 took care of that. Build 103 has only been out about a month so I would say the jury is out on how well things are doing but again, things have become reasonably stable for me.

If you are not on a VPF program...what does going to build 8.01 get you? Oh, and the show clock on 8.01 still isn't as accurate/update on NTP as well as it did on 7.83...which with NTP was always on the tick.

 |  IP: Logged

Steven J Hart
Master Film Handler

Posts: 282
From: WALES, ND, USA
Registered: Mar 2004


 - posted 02-26-2013 11:03 AM      Profile for Steven J Hart   Author's Homepage   Email Steven J Hart   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks, Steve, I was being led to believe I would soon not be able to play encrypted content if I didn't update.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 02-26-2013 02:54 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If that day comes...why not wait and update it then? At least you'll get the latest/greatest version rather than being part of the "experiment."

Note, that is my philosophy on all of the manufacturers too. The DCI compliant stuff has proven to be less reliable than the non-DCI complaint versions. But, as I said, it has gotten a LOT better.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 02-26-2013 07:14 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm curious who would have a motive to mislead you like that. Your tech (maybe so he can get an extra $ervice call from you)? GDC?

Regardless, listen to Steve. I couldn't agree more.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-26-2013 07:58 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
We had an incident once where an "upgrade" rendered our machine inoperable, so we went back to the previous version and all was well. It was something to do with the communication between the projector and server (I think, at least) and was fixed in the next upgrade.

 |  IP: Logged

Steven J Hart
Master Film Handler

Posts: 282
From: WALES, ND, USA
Registered: Mar 2004


 - posted 02-27-2013 03:55 PM      Profile for Steven J Hart   Author's Homepage   Email Steven J Hart   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Steve and Brad - Thank You for your advice!

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.