Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Digital Cinema Forum   » 3D in a drive in (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: 3D in a drive in
Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 02-11-2013 06:57 AM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, the very definition of a drive in owner means he is a character, probably a bit of an irrational character. That being said, NOTHING is impossible if you squirt enough money at it:

multiple small screens, multiple projectors off of one server, etc. louis

 |  IP: Logged

Ken Lackner
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1907
From: Atlanta, GA, USA
Registered: Sep 2001


 - posted 02-11-2013 08:14 AM      Profile for Ken Lackner   Email Ken Lackner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If this were Facebook, I would "Like" Brad's post.

I have no idea what the rest of this thread is about. [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged

Jack Ondracek
Film God

Posts: 2348
From: Port Orchard, WA, USA
Registered: Oct 2002


 - posted 02-11-2013 11:01 AM      Profile for Jack Ondracek   Author's Homepage   Email Jack Ondracek   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
As I understand the workings of 3D, I am under the impression that any silver treatment would drastically limit the screen's effectiveness along the sides.

Many drive-ins have some pretty drastic viewing angles, and the silvering / gain issue would likely wipe out your ability to use the sides.

My understanding is also that for 3D to be effective, you need the screen to fill as much of your field of view as possible... something that's not part of the average drive-in experience. You might make this work in the near-center rows, but it probably wouldn't be something you'd want in a huge field.

Then, there's the light issue... something that's always been a challenge for drive-ins. We're just getting over some of that with the use of the new Barco projectors. Throwing a 3D system in front of it would just screw it all up again.

And finally, as Barry noted, there's no customer demand for it. I have never had someone demand 3D or they'd go elsewhere.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-11-2013 11:14 AM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Jack Ondracek
My understanding is also that for 3D to be effective, you need the screen to fill as much of your field of view as possible.
That is true, at least for me. The first few 3-Ds we had, I watched from my normal preferred viewing spot (about 2/3 back from the screen). But one night for an experiment I went and sat in the third row from the front, and was downright astounded at how much better the experience was. The picture seemed brighter and the 3-D seemed to POP way more, all because the picture was occupying almost all of my field of vision. I'm convinced that a lot of 3-D "haters" feel that way because they're trying to experience 3-D the same way they do 2-D, and might possibly change their tune by just sitting closer to the screen.

All that being said, I don't think drive-in 3-D would be very effective simply because you CAN'T get that close-up experience at most drive-ins.

In a drive-in you

 |  IP: Logged

Sam D. Chavez
Film God

Posts: 2153
From: Martinez, CA USA
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 02-11-2013 11:14 AM      Profile for Sam D. Chavez   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The Dolby 3D system can use a white screen so the viewing angles are not so much an issue, but actual light getting to the screen is another matter.

I agree 3D in a drive in is kind of questionable for all the reason Jack cites.

 |  IP: Logged

Jay Glaus
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 123
From: Pittsburgh, PA USA
Registered: Dec 2010


 - posted 02-12-2013 01:12 AM      Profile for Jay Glaus   Author's Homepage   Email Jay Glaus   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yeah I always wondered about extreme angles. I went to CinemaCon last year and tried to find the worst seat possible for the worst angle on the 3D because I was curious about that, but it was no where near the same as a drive in angle. I mean some nights when we pack the screen in the summer I swear some people are so far to the side they are camping in the woods. And like was mentioned about sitting far back, I would think you get to the back rows and nothing really pops out of the screen any more. Oh well, 3D probably isn't part of the true drive in experience anyway

 |  IP: Logged

Tammo Buhren
Film Handler

Posts: 3
From: Munich, Bavaria, Germany
Registered: Sep 2010


 - posted 02-20-2013 02:50 PM      Profile for Tammo Buhren   Author's Homepage   Email Tammo Buhren   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
No matter if it makes sense to use 3D in a drive-in.....
As far as i know all front-windows of a car have a polarized window. That will definetly cause problems with 3D-systems using polarisation. This front-window will maybe also reflect or influence infrared-signals of a emitter for shutter glasses. Thatīs why also shutter glasses might not work properly. So there is only one option left... Dolby 3D.

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 02-20-2013 03:36 PM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
No, there are two options.

1) Dolby 3D.

2) Don't bother.

I'd go with option 2.

 |  IP: Logged

Rick Cohen
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 102
From: Amherst, New York
Registered: Feb 2011


 - posted 02-22-2013 09:07 PM      Profile for Rick Cohen   Author's Homepage   Email Rick Cohen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I operate a four screen drive-in with digital projection near Buffalo, New York.

Given the choice between having all of my teeth pulled with no anesthetic, and installing 3D on one of my screens, I would choose the first option.

Rick

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 02-22-2013 10:11 PM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I couldn't agree more!

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.