|
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
|
Author
|
Topic: What happens to old DCP's
|
|
|
|
|
Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 02-19-2013 01:58 AM
quote: Marcel Birgelen Or maybe we have working quantum computers by then that can brute-force 128-bit AES in a matter of seconds.
Believe it or not, there is at least one national, taxpayer-funded film archive in Europe which is collecting encrypted DCPs, without the keys, on the assumption that brute-forcing the encryption will one day be possible and that once the copyright term in the content has expired, this will enable it to provide access to this material as public records. Needless to say, the decision of its director to pursue this policy has proven controversial in film archiving circles, to put it mildly.
I suspect that we'll see studios and public sector archives take markedly different approaches with 'born digital' and 'born analogue content'. In terms of the latter, the cost of scanning and basic post-scanning image restoration is plummeting (scanners that will do 2K in real time are already available for around the $150k mark). Given that large film archives have for half a century now been investing in a passive conservation approach to film preservation (i.e. building and maintaining cool, dry vault facilities), I suspect that many will regard DCDMs and DCPs derived from film originals as essentially disposable items, because they can just scan the film again.
The preservation of born digital content is a different issue. The bottom line is that there is no known offline storage medium that can match the proven reliability of the long term storage of film in an atmospherically controlled vault. Unlike with content originated on film, you don't have a film to go back to if you lose your digital asset, and at the moment the only known way to ensure its survival is either a program of regular copying from legacy data storage media to current ones, or an always on solution such as a RAID or MAID. Presumably for master storage the studios and archives will regard the DCDM as the preservation master and the DCP as being of secondary importance (given that the latter can be recreated from the former at any time), but realistically they are looking at spending more per hour of footage per day looking after it than they would have been with film.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|