|
|
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1 2 3 4 5
|
|
Author
|
Topic: NEC filter price
|
|
|
Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 05-18-2015 11:38 AM
quote: Brad Miller In dealing with theaters all over the US, I can absolutely vouch for the booth environment dictating if rewashable filters should even be an option.
Absolutely - how much crud is in the air determines how much crud gets caught in an air filter, and thus how often that filter needs replacing or cleaning.
Shortly after moving from England to the US, my wife asked me to investigate why our home HVAC system wasn't working properly - the air flow through the ceiling ducts was very weak. Home air cooling systems are simply unknown in Britain (climate too cold to need them!), and so I had to start by reading up online about the basics of how these things work. "HVAC 101" took me to the panel air filter in the furnace unit. It was totally and utterly black - filter replaced, strong blasts of cold air restored.
When I asked the guy at Home Depot how often one is supposed to replace these things normally, his reply was that it depends almost entirely on the air quality where you live. At the bottom of the Inland Empire valley, where the smog settles = every 4 to 6 weeks. Up in the San Bernardino mountains (e.g. Arrowhead or Big Bear) = every year to 18 months. Drive up there and look down, and you can see the smog hanging over San Bernardino - a lovely brew of desert sand, dust, exhaust fumes and the output of the various industrial facilities in the area, Ontario Airport, etc (SB has been found by one study to have the lowest air quality/worst pollution of any metro in the US). It's all being sucked into everyone's HVAC filters, hence why you need to replace them so frequently.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 08-28-2016 09:55 AM
Having worked with the filters from the manufacturer and the OEMs...they seem to continually evolve. I've seen them with cardboard frames, plastic frames, white edges, black edges, with more pletes, less pletes, dividers between pletes. They all work and fail to varing degrees.
The current MIT knockoff filter set to the NC900 is a dead ringer to the factory installed filters. The MERV rating on the knockoffs are supposed to be the same as the factory (I have not nor have the facilities to test this).
I've seen VERY dirty projectors using the factory filters so they are not a guarantee of success.
The original Strong knock offs were not too good. They were restrictive of air flow, fit too loose (so dirt could go around the filter) but they have evolved their filters a couple of times now and while have thin white edges, plete wise, are pretty much the same as the original. NEC claimes that their edge has a metallic strip on it so that it will do a better job of stopping dirt electrstatically. I have not seen it work dramatically well.
I'd rather see ALL of the projector companies and those that are making aftermarket filters go to what Christie used on their CP2000S/SB series...a filter with a tight-fitting rubber seal around the filter that seals it up better. I dislike the metal mesh filters immensely. They don't filter sufficiently and they expect the end user to clean them regularly. I've found that getting people to change a dirty filter is going to be MUCH easier than getting people to regularly clean the metal mesh well without damaging it.
I think a lot of the filtration problems could be improved by going with a cheap "air register" type filter on the OUTSIDE of the projector and servers (yes servers and anything else with a fan such in crud too). It will stop the popcorn oils from getting in. In a sense, Christie is already doing this with their LAD filter that is really just sitting behind the main filter.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1 2 3 4 5
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|