|
|
This topic comprises 6 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Sony to Stop Paying for 3D Glasses in May 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carsten Kurz
Film God
Posts: 4340
From: Cologne, NRW, Germany
Registered: Aug 2009
|
posted 11-02-2011 08:43 AM
There are already high quality third-party re-usable glases on the market - loads of them. Cinemas just need to start selling them - which will only start after they or the patrons have to pay for the cheap RealD glasses multiple times.
E.g. the polaroid RealD compatible glasses are excellent and offer a noticably better 3D experience.
We probably won't see third-party Dolby 3D compatible glasses, since there's a patent from Infitec on the technology, and they are also quite expensive to make, at least in higher qualities like the original Dolby ones, left alone large viewing angles.
There's no patent on circular polarization, so these are much cheaper to produce, both regarding license as well as technological reasons. Too bad RealD is the worst performing 3D system, at least the Z-Screen and XL.
Talking about Sony and 3D glasses - Sony is just about to release the Panavision 3D system with their split-lens as an alternative to RealD XLS. This will not need silver screens. It will have reusable glasses similiar to the Dolby/Infitec approach.
Maybe these two different 3D systems is part of the reason why Sony wants to stop subsidizing 3D glasses. Sure it's unfair to support only the cheap disposable glasses, but not the reusable ones.
- Carsten
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!
Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 05-25-2012 10:28 PM
Well it looks like Sony backed down (this time).
http://the3d.co/2012/05/25/sony-backs-down-over-3d-glasses-for-men-in-black-3d/
quote:
Sony Pictures agrees to pay for “Men in Black 3″ 3-D glasses
Sony Pictures Entertainment has backed down from its refusal to pay for the 3-D glasses on this weekend’s science fiction sequel “Men in Black 3.” But the studio still doesn’t see eye to eye with exhibitors on the issue.
Sony sent a letter to exhibitors last fall informing them that as of May 1, 2012, it would not longer pay 3-D technology companies such as RealD the average cost of about 45 cents per ticket for 3-D glasses used by moviegoers. Sony contends that theaters, not studios, should cover the cost of supplying the glasses, which can add up to $10 million for very popular films.
In Europe, theaters cover the cost of glasses and sell them to patrons. In the U.S., moviegoers can use the glasses free of charge.
Leading theater chains have balked at changing the model in North America, noting that they already pay a license fee for 3-D equipment in their theaters. Executives of Regal and Cinemark recently reiterated to investors that they had no intention of paying for the 3-D glasses.
That prompted Sony to back down, at least for “Men in Black 3,” said two industry executives familiar with the matter who asked not to be identified. That’s not surprising given that tracking is good on the movie. The last thing Sony wants is to give people a reason not see the movie, which will be widely distributed in 3-D and 2-D.
Steve Elzer, a spokesman for Sony Pictures Entertainment, declined to comment on the studio’s decision but said: “Without affecting consumer access to our upcoming 3D pictures, we continue discussing this matter with the exhibition community while working towards a longterm solution that addresses our concerns about embracing a more sustainable eyewear model. Our position has not changed: it is not our intent to indefinitely subsidize 3D eyewear.”
The battle over who would pay for 3-D glasses first flared up in 2009, when 20th Century Foxattempted to stop paying for glasses and then relented when no other studios supported the decision.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 6 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|
Home
Printer-friendly view of this topic