|
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Incredible shrinking shipping cases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 01-06-2016 11:22 AM
One issue with the flash drives may be write speed. If a lab (or whoever does this) needs to make thousands of copies of a DCP, this is probably a major sticking point, especially since the infrastructure to deal with cloning large numbers of hard disks already exists.
Also, paradoxically, the small size of flash drives can be a problem, especially for "film" festivals, where it is necessary to keep track of many items that may need to move from venue to venue over the course of the event. As odd as it may seem, the larger form factor of a hard disk in a CRU carrier is actually more convenient, as it is less likely to become lost. On the other hand, hard disks rarely survive being dropped....
If I were a "film" distributor, I would want to send out my distribution copies in the most common format, since that is least likely to cause confusion at theatres. For now, that would be a hard disk in a CRU carrier. I wouldn't send out flash drives for the same reason why I wouldn't ship out 35mm prints on cores to theatres in the US--any "odd" format is likely to cause confusion and possibly lost shows.
I do question the hardiness of the cardboard boxes that Deluxe is using to ship out CRU disks, but they are most likely far cheaper than Pelican cases. No doubt, they wouldn't be using the cheaper packing material if damage to the disks were a major problem.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carsten Kurz
Film God
Posts: 4340
From: Cologne, NRW, Germany
Registered: Aug 2009
|
posted 01-07-2016 10:18 AM
We receive features on DCmini drives regularly. They are used by the largest european distributor for around 2 years now. We had some minor issues at first, but now they seem to perform flawlessly. Ocassionally we had connection problems through either the SATA or USB connection, but switching to the respective other connection always allowed a proper ingest.
Some very few systems with USB2.0 only ports have trouble with DCmini+drive combinations eating more then 500mA. As these cartridges were built for smaller shipping boxes, it is probably not possible to ship a small USB-Wall-Plug with them, but I would advise to include a dedicated USB-Y Power cable to take care of the current consumption issue. Or at least send one out with the CRU-converter.
Note, these cartridges have full dual USB3.0 and SATA capablities, it is not a converter between one of the two. So there are no compatibility issues using either interface.
I attached a thin loop of gaffer tape to the bottom of the CRU-conversion slot, so it's easier to pull it out without having to grip into the slot. Some people are reluctant to put their fingers into machines...
BTW - we never close the locks on the converter, just pop in and out the drive. We also usually leave the CRU converter stuck in the server CRU slot, as it seals the CRU slot against air and dirt passthrough.
- Carsten
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|