Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Digital Cinema Forum   » 'Hateful Eight' - not 70 mm. (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: 'Hateful Eight' - not 70 mm.
Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 01-22-2016 03:56 AM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
On an unmasked screen, seeing the 2.76 in a 2.39 container is like seeing three images at once and it's horrible.

You got the unlit open screen, the dark grey hue of the 2.39 container, and then the image in the middle of this container.

Feature definitely needs to be masked for a proper presentation.

 |  IP: Logged

Allan Riddelll
Film Handler

Posts: 33
From: msida , malta, europe
Registered: Jan 2009


 - posted 01-22-2016 08:07 AM      Profile for Allan Riddelll   Email Allan Riddelll   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
We have side masking. Other than the slight black bars top and
bottom, image is perfectly satisfactory.

 |  IP: Logged

Jim Cassedy
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1661
From: San Francisco, CA
Registered: Dec 2006


 - posted 01-25-2016 10:53 AM      Profile for Jim Cassedy   Email Jim Cassedy   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Stephen Furley
Do the digital and 35 mm versions preserve the full Ultra Panavision aspect ratio or are they reduced to 2.39? If the original a.r what format are they in; is the image letterboxed within a 2.39 DCP or 35 mm anamorphic film frame?
HATEFUL 8 is playing in 35mm at a theater here in San Francisco.
A friend who had seen it swore that it was not "letterboxed' to fit the screen.

I got a chance to actually examine a 35mm print of HF-8 last night and I can
confirm that they did letterbox the SuperUltraPanavision (or whatever) image
inside of the the standard 35mm scope frame. You can clearly see thick black
frame-lines on the print. I did a little more probing and found out that the
theater he saw it has movable top & bottom maskings, which they apparently
adjusted to hide (or 'mask' [Wink] ) the fact that the vertical size had been reduced.

(Wasn't sure exactly where to post this, but it's "not 70mm" so I puttit here.)

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.