Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Digital Cinema Forum   » NEC 900 Firmware (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: NEC 900 Firmware
Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-08-2016 02:03 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Marco, I get no complaints fomr any theater owners about it at all. And when I am on site the pictures are all looking great. I don't know what else to tell you... I certainly acknowledge the drives are way to coarse though.

If there WERE problems with focus or image size drift I would certainly be hearing about it and seeing it for myself. I have 34 NC-900's installed.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Marco Giustini
Film God

Posts: 2713
From: Reading, UK
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 05-08-2016 02:19 PM      Profile for Marco Giustini   Email Marco Giustini   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
then go tell NEC that they are mistaken and that the lens in the NC900 is working great because the pictures look good.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 05-08-2016 04:26 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Oh stop Mark...stop trying to defend the indefensible. It isn't even subject to interpretation. For the same reason that the shift adjustments are course is why it can't hit its mark. It's a fact. It does better (or is less noticeable) on zoom and focus but on H/V position, it is abysmal.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-09-2016 01:18 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I agree and I mentioned above the motors were way too coarse. I just have not had any zoom or focus drift issues at all.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Marco Giustini
Film God

Posts: 2713
From: Reading, UK
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 05-09-2016 05:01 PM      Profile for Marco Giustini   Email Marco Giustini   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
So you had "zero lens problems with the 900" and "zero complaints and no focus or zoom drift" and also "the pictures are all looking great" - but the 'pictures' are a foot off the screen as the H/V shift is just rubbish.

Sounds like a great technical analysis to me.

 |  IP: Logged

Carsten Kurz
Film God

Posts: 4340
From: Cologne, NRW, Germany
Registered: Aug 2009


 - posted 05-09-2016 06:05 PM      Profile for Carsten Kurz   Email Carsten Kurz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have an NC900 in a distant location which I only visit once a year. They may not do the most advanced lens movement possible there, it's a constant height screen. But I never have to adjust the lens when I'm there. So, it may be coarse, it may be off a bit from time to time, but it seems there is no absolute drift.
I'm okay with that. It's a low cost machine, what do you expect?
From the customers point of view, it's performing flaw-less.

- Carsten

 |  IP: Logged

Ian Freer
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 135
From: Wellington, New Zealand
Registered: Oct 2003


 - posted 05-09-2016 07:27 PM      Profile for Ian Freer   Email Ian Freer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I generally agree with Carsten.
The lens shift for me does not hit the same spot twice, but it does not drift more and more over time either.
It's never 'perfect', but in general the image is just fine and not causing anyone any grief.

Whether that's acceptable because it's 'low cost', I am not sure. It's low cost compared to a bigger machine, but still a significant investment, especially for a smaller theatre... Personally I find it frustrating.

I have changed my approach to screen files when installing these projectors; rather than try and be pixel-perfect, I now leave a little over-spill on to the masking (that's almost, sorta, kinda (yeah I'm trying to justify this to myself) what it was there for in the first place with 35mm) so hopefully between each lens format change, the over-spill may shift a little to the top and next time a little to the bottom or whatever, but generally end up with the image always filling the screen.

 |  IP: Logged

Marco Giustini
Film God

Posts: 2713
From: Reading, UK
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 05-10-2016 03:29 AM      Profile for Marco Giustini   Email Marco Giustini   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I confirm the lens does not drift, it simply doesn't hit the same spot twice.

It's still a 5-zero worth machine, I reckon it should be possible to engineer a better solution for lens positioning.

Most of our customers won't complain unless the picture is upside down AND with wrong colours. If a customer does not complain about something, that doesn't mean anything to me. If we evaluated equipment based on customer satisfaction, everything would be top notch.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 05-10-2016 05:19 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yes, it does not drift so much as the lens shift system does not have the "resolution" to land on the same place twice. Low cost or no, it was ill designed. You can get home theatre projectors that cost 1/10 that have better accuracy. My brief experience with Barco's S2K machines was better in terms of lens accuracy too.

Now, if you have constant width screens, THEN you could effectively never move the lens so the problem wouldn't show itself (shift the image, if necessary on the imager).

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-10-2016 09:54 AM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
My case is the latter one where we are only using the zoom. I agree there are more accurate home projectors and why NEC used such coarse Hall drive motors is beyond me.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.