Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Digital Cinema Forum   » DCP-o-Matic: Problem creating 5.1 VF (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: DCP-o-Matic: Problem creating 5.1 VF
Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 06-02-2016 12:59 PM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Many thanks - downloaded and installed 2.8.7, and it's now 14% "encoding picture and sound" through the VF render after about an hour and a half. If it keeps going at the same rate, it should take 9-10 hours total and be done when I get back from work tonight. Will update then!

I also emailed you the log from the effectively stalled 2.8.0 render.

 |  IP: Logged

Carsten Kurz
Film God

Posts: 4340
From: Cologne, NRW, Germany
Registered: Aug 2009


 - posted 06-02-2016 02:42 PM      Profile for Carsten Kurz   Email Carsten Kurz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
That still sounds too slow for me. But let it go...

- Carsten

 |  IP: Logged

Carl Hetherington
Film Handler

Posts: 93
From: York, North Yorkshire, England
Registered: Jul 2012


 - posted 06-02-2016 03:10 PM      Profile for Carl Hetherington   Author's Homepage   Email Carl Hetherington   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It is rather slow, but at least now it doesn't get any slower as it goes on.

The slow bits now, I believe, are the filters for the upmixer. I need to look at those.

 |  IP: Logged

Carsten Kurz
Film God

Posts: 4340
From: Cologne, NRW, Germany
Registered: Aug 2009


 - posted 06-02-2016 03:44 PM      Profile for Carsten Kurz   Email Carsten Kurz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Ah, yes the upmixer. Haven't used it on a full length feature yet.

- Carsten

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 06-03-2016 10:29 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Although the progress reporting is now a lot more informative, I'm afraid that the basic problem still exists. When I got home last night it was on 32%, and it's only on 33 now (seven hours later).

Something is happening whereby the rate of audio processing decreases as it gets deeper into a longer DCP. I'm pretty convinced that the same thing is actually happening as when I tried doing this with 2.8.0: it completes the first 15-20% of the process relatively quickly, and then slows to a crawl.

 |  IP: Logged

Carl Hetherington
Film Handler

Posts: 93
From: York, North Yorkshire, England
Registered: Jul 2012


 - posted 06-03-2016 10:46 AM      Profile for Carl Hetherington   Author's Homepage   Email Carl Hetherington   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hmm. Could you re-send the log from this new run?

 |  IP: Logged

Carsten Kurz
Film God

Posts: 4340
From: Cologne, NRW, Germany
Registered: Aug 2009


 - posted 06-03-2016 11:48 AM      Profile for Carsten Kurz   Email Carsten Kurz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Maybe try without the up-mixer?

Not that it really matters here - but what type of machine (CPU/Speed) is this? Could you check memory/swap usage during the conversion?

Carl - would there be special log options to activate in order to facilitate analysis?

- Carsten

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 06-03-2016 12:51 PM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
New log file emailed to Carl.

I don't think it's a hardware issue, because I've just tried the same thing on another computer running the same operating system, and once again I'm at 14% after around an hour and a half. For the record, the computer I've been using so far is an Acer Aspire V laptop with a Core i5 processor, RAM upgraded to 8GB, with the hard drive nuked, UEFI disabled and Ubuntu 14.04 LTS (64-bit) installed. The keyboard and touch pad are so sh!tty that it's useless for any interactive work, so I use it almost exclusively for long copying jobs and DCP rendering.

It's definitely an audio processing issue that occurs when:

1 - You're creating a VF that "refers to existing DCP" for the pix but not the sound. There is no problem doing this the other way round, because I've created countless scope VFs from flat OVs (e.g. hour long slide loops for walkins) without this slowing down issue.

2 - You're trying to modify the audio in some way, but I don't think it relates to the upmixer specifically and exclusively.

While I was recreating the issue on my main PC, I also started another render going on the laptop, but changing audio settings only in the VF. This time I deselected the left channel altogether and moved right to center (to simulate the correction of a 2.0 mono file to a 1.0 on center channel mono DCP, something it would be very useful to be able to do). This was on a 22-minute file. This time it got to 45% (ish) pretty quickly, and then slowed right down again. So unless I'm missing something, the problem has to be something to do with the way it's creating new audio to sync to existing video.

 |  IP: Logged

Carsten Kurz
Film God

Posts: 4340
From: Cologne, NRW, Germany
Registered: Aug 2009


 - posted 06-03-2016 02:59 PM      Profile for Carsten Kurz   Email Carsten Kurz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I didn't suspect a hardware problem, but I wanted to get an idea about the general performance of your machine and wether the slowdown could be caused by a memory leak leading to excessive swapping.

- Carsten

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 07-04-2016 12:33 PM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Very happy to report that this bug is fixed in version 2.8.16 - it created the audio VF for the 87-minute feature in 13 minutes. Very many thanks for Carl for fixing this.

 |  IP: Logged

Buck Wilson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 894
From: St. Joseph MO, USA
Registered: Sep 2010


 - posted 07-04-2016 05:22 PM      Profile for Buck Wilson   Email Buck Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
That's fantastic. What great service.

Carl, what drove you to create this great program? And why free?

Bless you!

 |  IP: Logged

Carl Hetherington
Film Handler

Posts: 93
From: York, North Yorkshire, England
Registered: Jul 2012


 - posted 07-04-2016 05:44 PM      Profile for Carl Hetherington   Author's Homepage   Email Carl Hetherington   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hey Buck,

Initially I made it because I was a projectionist and we were getting a lot of stuff on DVD/MP4/whatever that "just" needing running in the middle of a set of DCP trailers, or something. Work were never going to spring for CineAsset or whatever so I looked at OpenDCP and tried to make a one-click version of it. Initially the idea was to integrate DVD ripping so you could put your DVD in, click go and get a DCP out! The first versions were basically a set of command-line tools (opendcp and FFmpeg mainly) gaffer-taped together with a quite crappy front end.

It started being useful at work so I released it, and it's amazing what a few emails from interested folks will do for one's motivation.

I left my projectionist job when available hours started fading away (with full automation of digital shows and decreasing 35mm) but by then people were showing more interest in DCP-o-matic so I kept on with it. And here we are... It's a shame; the projectionist job is still my favourite [Smile]

DCP-o-matic is free because I think free-as-in-speech is the only sensible way to make and release software, so that's ideological I suppose. The fact that few have figured out a way to make a living out of it is an implementation detail [Wink]

Cheers, Carl

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.